From invisible gem to national treasure, Sydenham Park's future was talked up by about 200 people crammed into the Brookfield School hall on Wednesday night.
The future of the three hectare property off Millers Road is in doubt after the Tauranga City Council said it will no longer budget $30,000 a year to manage the park.
An array of Kauri at the park.
Frank Sydenham left the property to the city in perpetuity, as long as it is maintained as a botanical park.
The park is the home of the country's foremost kauri collection.
Ecologist and tree advocate Graeme Platt says the collection is world class, worth about $180,000 and is going to become a tourist attraction in its own right.
The public meeting was called by former botanic gardens trust chairman Richard Hart to educate the community about the trust deed, and encourage people to make submissions to the council's annual plan about the park decision.
'I'm absolutely chuffed that amount of people turned up,” says Richard.
'We really wanted the meeting last night to inform the community.
'It's the submissions that council will read.
'They might or might not take any notice of this public meeting – at the end of the day it's the submissions and the council hearings that determine the budget.”
A range of speakers talked about Frank, the park, the kauri collection and its future.
The meeting was chaired by councillor Larry Baldock who took a bit of flak on the chin about the council decision, says Richard.
'It's part of being a councillor really,” says Larry.
'I think it was pretty good and pretty positive in the main.
'Most people want to see the legacy left by Frank Sydenham kept for the good of the city.
'I think they got the message that it's no good throwing rocks at the council, they need to come up with positive ways forward, and I think there are quite a few good options.”
He was pleased a Guardian Trust representative was there to explain the trust deed, and that whatever the council does, the park is not going to be sold off to the highest bidder.
'Whatever the trust does with it, it has to be in the spirit of the original trust deed and that is important I think.
'It was always set up for the purposes of a facility for the community to benefit from.
'I think what the council wanted to see was just how much community interest there was.
'Think that was pretty clear last night.”
Neighbours of the park have collected 500 signatures on a petition to council to continue managing the park.
Regional councillor Paula Thompson's presence at the meeting is a reminder that people making submissions to Tauranga City Council should also be making them to the regional council, says Larry.
'There could be a broader partnership in how we fund the ongoing costs and the development of it.
'There's no doubt it is a great gift to the community.
'We just need to find a way forward that doesn't make it too much of a burden on Tauranga ratepayers.”



13 comments
Could we be told the full truth here?
Posted on 31-03-2011 16:35 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
There's possibly a lot of half truths going on in this. Cr Murray Guy gave some of the history in an earlier Sunlive post which was very interesting to read. What happened to the previous running of the park that I believe involved Mr Hart? Was the park really left to the city? I thought it was still privately owned land that was meant to go to a tertiary institution? Why didn't that happen? Why were there signs on Millers Rd saying "Save or sell" when it's not the council's park to sell? That said, pay to maintain this private property as long as us mug ratepayers are prepared to pay more rates for it. Can't see the cost just staying at $30k a year. It'll end up costing heaps and that's fine as long as we understand that clearly.
COUNCILLORS DON'T UNDERSTAND
Posted on 31-03-2011 17:18 | By WIDOWMAKER
It is a lovely park and more money should be spent to increase the green areas, it is hard to see why Councillors even thought about cutting the budget on anything, the city interests are best decided by staff should just decide, Councillors would be best to spend there time completing pathways and other similar tasks that fit the ability of each.
@ WM WRONG PILLS TODAY
Posted on 31-03-2011 21:23 | By TERMITE
'STAFF SHOULD JUST DECIDE' COMON MATE LOOK PAST THE PILE OF PAPER ON YA DESK AND ADD UP THE DEBT, IT IS ACTUALLY HIGHER THAN THE PAPER PILE, DO YOU SEE IT? THAT IS THE RESULT OF TEH FORMER CEO HAVING BOTH HANDS ON THE THROTTLE INSTEAD OF ONE, THE OTHER SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE RUDDER.
Carbon Credits 4 Sale
Posted on 01-04-2011 08:32 | By cinik
Surely the lovely Kauri trees could produce an income by selling the carbon credits.
Park?
Posted on 01-04-2011 10:37 | By Mr bay
Park what park no one knows its there so no one will miss it.
Allergic to ranters
Posted on 01-04-2011 11:49 | By Jenny Argante
I am getting so sick and tired of mindless ranters who think that merely writing down their thoughts - and where they keep their brains could be anyone's guess - somehow makes them valid. Green spaces have been shown to benefit city environments enormously, and the people who live in those cities. And there is also the ethical question of accepting a gift that comes with conditions, as the council did, and as they ratified on three further occasions, and then ignoring fulfilment of those conditions. Frank Sydenham died in 1972. Why has it taken nearly 40 years to even get a sign up saying it's a public space? Why accept generous donations of kauri trees, etc., if you're not prepared to look after them? Were the plants already there sold? In which case, who got that money? Or were they simply destroyed, as some locals aver is what happened to hundreds of native plants and thousands of bulbs. Until we have public servants who understand what is meant by integrity, probity and ethics, we will have problems. And, by the waya, a Model Plan for the park was created after much hard work by the local community, and could easily generate income enough to keep itself going. $30K per annum from the council would fulfil all their obligations nicely, I should say.
Jenny Argante
Posted on 01-04-2011 13:06 | By Mr bay
Careful Jenny sounds like you are ranting..
allergic to truth?
Posted on 01-04-2011 14:20 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Doesn't Jenny Argante know that this so called park was a commercial nursery for years. It's never ever been given to the city as far as my inquiries have found. In fact I hear that Mr Sydenham wanted a tertiary institute to have it. Maybe a good site for a university. Or maybe Frank's Trust should use it as a great place for affordable housing. There's not enough affordable housing in this city and this space would be great as there's the fabulous Carmichael reserve just down the road.
$10,000 MOWING FOR A YEAR
Posted on 02-04-2011 16:50 | By TERMITE
That is $200 a week to mow lawns ... that looks rather high love to know what the other $20,000 is for?
Widowmaker is a looter
Posted on 03-04-2011 12:28 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
@Widowmaker: I suggest you put your hands in your OWN pocket if you think the park should have more money spent on it, instead of shoving them into other peoples pockets. You are a looter and you dont even realise it.
G Gillickers, this is for you
Posted on 04-04-2011 00:55 | By Jenny Argante
I quote from the document handed out at the meeting and not refuted by any of the councillors present [my comments in square brackets]: "The 3ha of land at 6 Millers Road Otumoetai [actually Brookfield] was left, by the late Frank Sydenham after his death in 1972, [ie 40 years ago, hello] to the citizens of Tauranga for the purposes of providing a botanical park. The original intention of the trust deed was that the land would be used for [horticultural] education. Both Otumoetai College and Tauranga Boys College used the property but as of 2003 the land was not being used for educational purposes. Accordingly the next option in the will was for the gardens to become 'a botanical park for the enjoyment and benefit of the citizens of Tauranga and the public generally, such park to be administered by the Tauranga City Council and kept and maintained in good order and condition by the said council.' In April 2003, Council accepted the offer to administer the Sydenham property as specified in the will of Frank Sydenham as a botanical park." Is that clear enough for you?
Education Mr Sydenham's intention
Posted on 04-04-2011 09:59 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Jenny providing us readers with quotes from the meeting handout actually supports my idea. The land should be used for university or other educational purposes. "The original intention of the trust deed was that the land would be used for education." You can't get any clearer than that. Given that the owners original intention was for educational purposes it seems that the botanic park idea has come later. Mr Sydenham's educational intent should be honoured and valued.
Brillaux, name yourself
Posted on 08-04-2011 12:06 | By Jenny Argante
If you're going to fling aspersions around, do it under your own name. Don't hide behind an alias so you can get away with slagging off others whose opinions you don't agree with. I plan my individual budget so it covers necessities and allows some income for 'leisure and pleasure'. Feed the body, feed the soul. I think the council should do the same. We can all survive on bare necessities, but it isn't necessarily a full life. Individually, we decide what we mean by 'leisure and pleasure'. For the council, it's more difficult - they've got to meet, in some small way, every ratepayer's definition of what is allowable in that sphere of daily living. Keep the term 'looter' to yourself, and don't be such a small-minded Scrooge.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.