The Sydenham Park botanical gardens will continue to be maintained by the Tauranga City Council.
In an effort to save $30,000, a council proposal to end its maintenance of the park, which boasts a world class collection of kauri trees, resulted in a community outcry and a deluge of submissions in support of council retaining upkeep.
Kauri trees at Sydenham Park.
In its annual plan deliberations, the council has decided to continue its involvement and to set up a new Tauranga Botanic Gardens Trust that will do the day-to-day management of the three hectare park.
'That was approved in terms of allowing a new trust to be set up to facilitate that project,” says Mayor Stuart Crosby of the decision made on Monday.
'The previous trust did a project to come up with a concept plan, and then they disbanded, so hopefully the new trust can pick up components of that if they wish.”
The decision means the land will be managed in accordance with the city's reserves management plan, similar to the other city parks.
The main benefit for the council in setting up a new trust is that future development of the park will become the responsibility of the trust.
The land was left to the citizens of Tauranga by the late Frank Sydenham for the purpose of providing a botanical park.
The land remains the property of the Guardian Trust.
There is currently $30,000 in the annual plan for the maintenance of the property.
That has been reduced to $20,000 for the coming financial year, says Stuart.
Under the trust deed the council is required to provide a botanical park, keep it in good order and condition and pay attention to developing sub tropical plants.
The council received 86 submissions about the park with 75 supporting council retaining the park, two were opposed and nine did not state a position.
One submission was a petition with 1247 signatures in favour of the council retaining its involvement.



17 comments
Location?
Posted on 31-05-2011 12:27 | By ironwoman
and where is this Sydenham Park?
Good result
Posted on 31-05-2011 12:37 | By morepork
Many local residents were seriously concerned about this. Personally, I think we need to hang on to places like this, for 2 reasons: 1. Mr. Sydenham generously donated it and the Council accepted. (A deal is a deal...) 2. As pressure for more housing space increases, beautiful spaces like this come under ever more threat. "Man does not live by bread alone".
@ironwoman
Posted on 31-05-2011 13:56 | By bringa
its pretty much on the corner of Millers and Bellevue Roads but the entrance is on Millers road next to brookfield primary school. This was one of the issues - the lack of signage and the lack of a profile for the park and therefore lack of public awareness.
YoYo Council
Posted on 31-05-2011 14:08 | By Openknee8ted
Strikes again
Credit were it's due
Posted on 31-05-2011 18:11 | By Nigel Barker
and that is to TCC. Great stuff!! Have a question,why is the amount reduced now that some one else is going to manage it? Why not give them $30k this year and tell them they get the same next year and then $20k/pa from there on. At least that gives then a real good chance to set up for the future to the point of being self sufficient. Just as a privately company owned would be. I for one can see a heap of golden opportunities where this green land would be self funding. Again ~ 'Great Decision' & thanks on behalf of many. "Citizens Monitoring Council"
Great
Posted on 31-05-2011 18:39 | By Jenny Argante
Now it has to be, Use it or lose it, so the first priority for a trust after fundraising for development is how to fulfil the educational purposes Mr Sydenham wanted for this. And we need a trust that will be true to its purposes and work together as a team. I would like to be a Friend of Sydenham Park - I know some excellent people who have expressed a desire to serve on the trust. Green spaces are a city's lungs; they do us good physically, emotionally and mentally.
Where is the Sydenham land
Posted on 31-05-2011 19:04 | By Murray.Guy
The Sydenham land is 700 meters further up Millers Road from the awesome, but under-resourced, 150 acre Gordon Carmichael Reserve. Gordon Carmichael Reserve features native plantings and is home to a variety of birds, making it a pleasant spot for walking, cycling, and all manner of family recreational pursuits. The 60 hectare reserve has been developed into an oasis of native plants and wetlands located between the Mayfield subdivision in Bethlehem and the suburb of Brookfield. Features include a playground and an outdoor classroom area which is used for Learning Through Discovery programmes. More than two kilometres of walkways wind through this reserve including 230 metres of boardwalk lined with native plants. These walkways provide excellent walking and cycling links between Bethlehem, Brookfield and Bellevue.
Sydenham Park botanical gardens
Posted on 31-05-2011 20:39 | By Glen Clova
Thank you Brookfield deserves this.
Thanks Murray
Posted on 31-05-2011 20:56 | By Nigel Barker
Something I was not aware of and will sure as make use of the area. Now sir ~ could you answer my previous question please? Over recent times I have noticed your input into these forums and have appreciated that. Not always agree with you but appreciated none the less. Shame on "The Boss" fella 'Stuart' for his lack of fronting up. Guess we will see more of him as the election gets closer. "Citizens Monitoring Council"
Ratepayers action does work!
Posted on 31-05-2011 22:58 | By SpeakUp
Thanks to all who care for this park. As we witnessed, the Council has cut 50% of the allowance. It is obvious that they couldn't care less about our park but still have the power to decide. If only the Council would cut down its own machine to a lean 2/3, there would be more funds for community orientated itineraries. Well, all the best to the new trust. May integrity and wisdom guide its deeds. -SpeakUp- "Citizens Monitoring Council"
Half baked TCC solutions
Posted on 01-06-2011 07:38 | By KAMIKAZE
As usual Council have come up with a nothingness proposal in an effort to please everyone and it is still going to cost $20k pa.Should have tried to get the upkeep over to a Community Trust and then butted out.In the end it will become a bureaucratic nightmare and a wasteful exercise in futility.Nigel Barker stop being so laudatory wait for the results first B4 going off the deep end.
PLEASING !
Posted on 01-06-2011 07:51 | By MISS ADVENTURE
To see that the 'annual budget" diversion plan has ended where the funds spent of $10,000pa are topped up potentially to $20,000 pa a small price ot pay.
A Green and Mean machiine
Posted on 02-06-2011 09:02 | By EYESPY
Well said Jenny Argante.Yes it is a case of use it and fund it or lose it.Look forward to seeing you Jenny down there at the weekend working bees and at the regular fundraising events.It will inspire you in your writings and be an inspiration to the rest of us.Good luck with your project.
Not Mr Sydenhams vision
Posted on 02-06-2011 14:06 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Mr Sydenham wanted an educational institution built here according to the info given out. To fund it, make student accommodation around the perimeter, use the funds to build the learning centre, and keep the botanic kauri part as is. Very simple and doesn't take an army of trusts and bureaucrats to do. My prediction is that the 20 or 30k a year is just the beginning crack at rates funding. I predict that within a few years a so-called community trust will be lobbying council for far more than 30k a year to fulfil its own purposes.
for Morepork
Posted on 02-06-2011 16:18 | By al pillocksworth
Just wondered how come a deal's a deal over this park, but when it comes to assurances given by Art Gallery supporters that a one-off one million dollars would be the ratepayer contribution to the gallery, that deal can be changed to another deal costing almost a million a year? Also I thought Mr S didn't ever donate the park to council.
ART PROMISES
Posted on 03-06-2011 13:56 | By Silence of the Lambs
Pillocks to the whole deal, they obviously forgot to note that the $1 million odd is every year? Silly me "one off" means each year right, I think they should have to fund it themselves. The million would be far better used on: decent sirens for the Tsunami's, Kauri Trees, walkways (built by Murray) and much more with something then to show for it.
@Pillocksworth
Posted on 06-06-2011 14:08 | By morepork
My statement was not selective. A deal IS a deal. BUT, it can be changed by AGREEMENT, NOT UNILATERALLY. I tried to explain this at length under the Art Gallery posts where I wrote that "an agreement is an agreement as long as people agree to it." If it needs to be changed (and sometimes there can be no progress WITHOUT change), then it must be changed by AGREEMENT of all concerned. It would be way off topic (something I try to avoid) to rake all this up again in this thread. I believe the original Art Gallery deal was changed by agreement of the parties to it, so that is OK in my book. I understand you don't see it that way, but I see no point in arguing what is a fait accompli. Hope this clarifies my statement.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.