The Mount base track re-opens today with Tauranga City Council staff taking the opportunity to reveal how the $650,000 repair job was paid for.
Tauranga City Councillor Larry Baldock and council staff tour Mauao's base track ahead of its full reopening to the public today.
A memorandum presented by city parks manager Marie Gordon and released to the public details not only the costs of the repairs, but how the estimated $650,000 required was obtained.

Mauao park ranger team leader Warren Aitken and council development engineering team leader Steve Hurley examine a water out pipe.
'The savings available to council to enable the repairs to Mauao to be undertaken without exceeding the approved budget have come about through a proactive approach to managing costs,” says Marie.

Falling rocks remain a risk for walkers and joggers on Mauao's base track, but overall the mountain is deemed safe for public use.
Examples of city parks costs savings to generate the surplus funds now spent on repairing Mauao include:
- Cutting turf from Bayfair Reserve to repair grass areas in other parks – saving the cost of buying in turf from a nursery.
- Reusing retired playground under surfacing bark as a garden mulch.
- Separating green waste from rubbish when gardening to reduce the weight of refuse being dumped.
- Changing the type of turf to reduce mowing requirements.
'Total savings made this way are still being calculated and the examples are not the full list, but even these simple changes initiated during the first half of the year have resulted in an estimated saving of $50,000 in one contract, which had otherwise been planned to be spent this year,” says Marie.

An Evergreen Land Care contractor sprays grass seeds onto a slip – a process used to stabilise the land.
'There are other areas already identified as having similar opportunities, which will be implemented progressively and will be reflected in the year end reporting.”
Normally, the savings achieved are banked and not used to take up other opportunities.
Marie says additional effort has been made to reduce spending further as a result of the rain in January to accommodate the cost of repairing Mauao within the approved budget.
This includes a delay in re-levelling a sports field at Grenada Park, reducing the extent of the planned planting in the Gordon Carmichael Reserve, reduced spending in the Kopurererua Valley, employing PD workers to do some of the maintenance work normally done by contractors, reducing the normally proactive response to customer requests to address only essentials.
This has affected weeding and minor park improvements.
They have also been getting some sharp prices on contracts, says Marie.
'Just this week we had quotes come in for some work on Coronation Park that ranged from $8000 to $24,000,” says Marie.
By the end of December 2010 there was an overall under spend across the maintenance budget of $635,000.
The figure is a mix of true savings where the money would not be required because we had done the work for less and budget unspent where the work is still to be undertaken or not carried out as planned.
'In March, the expected costs associated with repairing Mauao access was $650,000.
'After all the work that has been done so far and with a lot better information now available to us, that estimate stands,” says Marie.
'It also includes cleaning up after all the minor slips that have occurred since January which have added to the expense.”
A final actual cost may be available by the time the parks department does its end of year reporting, but that is subject to the remaining repairs being completed by then.
Slip repairs on Mauao are expected to continue to be an annual expense as they have been for decades.
'The thing that is unpredictable and has the biggest impact financially is the scale and extent of the damage each time.”
Mauao track repair costs as at 9 June 2011
Total Specialist consultant services: $87,642. (Expected to end up at $110,000)
Total Security: $50,000. Includes security guards, fencing, signs, installation etc.
Total Construction: $260,000. (Expected to end up at $490,000.)
|
|
To Date |
Expected |
Comments |
|
Specialist |
$87,642.00 |
$110,000.00 |
This includes |
|
Security |
$50,000.00 |
$50,000.00 |
This includes |
|
Construction |
$259,886.00 |
$490,000.00 |
This includes |
|
Total |
$397,528.00 |
$650,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
Slip 3 |
|
|
Debris removal carried out as a part of stone wall repair |
|
Slip 4 |
$3,374.00 |
|
Construction only |
|
Slip 5 |
$7,643.00 |
$10,000.00 |
Allowance made for hydroseeding and pipe sock |
|
Slip 6 |
$6,359.00 |
$10,000.00 |
Allowance made for hydroseeding and extra track material |
|
Stone Wall |
$28,459.00 |
|
Construction only |
|
Debris clearance |
$45,041.00 |
|
Construction only |
|
Debris clearance |
$38,353.00 |
|
Construction only |
|
General Labour |
$29,557.00 |
$50,000.00 |
Allowance made for May and June hours |
|
Oruahine Track |
$101,100.00 |
$300,000.00 |
Allows for second crib wall and track restoration |



22 comments
Consultants Again
Posted on 17-06-2011 12:47 | By Jitter
Surely TCC with a staff of around 500, which includes qualified engineers, the employment of external consultants for a clean up task like this is totally unneccessary. TCC have done similar cleanups on and around Mauao in the past so surely consultants are not required every time. $110,000 to date could therefore have been saved on this job. If TCC must use consultants for every job then they should get rid of the engineers on their staff as they appear to be redundant anyway. This would reduce the TCC annual salary bill considerably. Employing five consultant firms for this one job is absolutely ridiculous. What input did TCC engineers have, or did they call the consultants in ? From the tone of this report TCC staff are very proud that this job ONLY cost to date $650,000. I agree the $50,000 for security should not have been required as notices advising the public that there was no access and of the danger should have been sufficient. However and unfortunately there are a number of absolute idiots living among us who were very reluctant to even listen to the security personnel let alone take any notice of danger warnings. I am afraid my feeling is that anyone who ignores warning notices or security personnel and continue into an obviously dangerous area become totally responsible for their own actions and safety.
Good job!
Posted on 17-06-2011 13:01 | By morepork
A welcome relief to see openness and some very good management. The base track is dear to many hearts (mine included) and to see it being attended to and repaired in a cost effective way is a real pleasure. Congratulations ot all concerned.
THE GLIMMER OF HOPE AT TCC V HOW DID THEY DO THAT !!!! WHEN WANT TO
Posted on 17-06-2011 14:42 | By WARTS N ALL
GLIMMER - Amazing when want to that savings can be made to then have a spend up on 'other' things, but what it shows is that there is wonton overspending rife and top to bottom. HOW DID THEY DO THAT - Apply teh idea tothe whole of TCC and perhaps with a little effort the bills will be half and the rates maybe will be 65% less, but of course that would mean no one needs about 300 odd POINTY HEADS also, we can but dream ...
What does this actually mean?
Posted on 17-06-2011 15:43 | By al pillocksworth
'The savings available to council to enable the repairs to Mauao to be undertaken without exceeding the approved budget have come about through a proactive approach to managing costs,” says Marie. Why weren't the savings being made now, and rightly put to fixing the Mount, made anyway regardless of the unexpected Mount costs? Wouldn't a proactive approach to managing costs be expected anyway? What was the alternative, a reckless approach perhaps? As good as the savings may be, they don't give confidence of tight budget management.
Lets cut to the chase on this propaganda
Posted on 17-06-2011 17:16 | By Nigel Barker
The facts are that it has cost the Ratepayers $650k. It was always going to cost the Ratepayers. Some one mentioned honesty ... Really?? Where?? No doubt TCC will correct me if I am wrong but the turf cutting at Bayfair, the green waste recycling, are savings from over a couple of years...Correct? So why was it just sitting there and not disclosed? And lets me very clear, that these sort of antics and gobble de gook would not be viewed very well in the private sector. Savings of the size reported show that openness has not been forth coming in the past and day to day management has been lees than satisfactory. The stuff Marie is talking about is what one would expect all day every day from a well paid intelligent employee. Not a one off big deal to try and brush over the real issues. Again try these antics in private enterprise. I very much support and agree with the previous posters comments and questions. Mr Mayor Sir "what other under spends are there ??" Please tell us now and do not use as election point scoring. - Citizens Monitoring Council -
What a Crock
Posted on 18-06-2011 00:10 | By CC8
Ever since the "learned ones" decided that government in all forms was a cash cow , to be administered by them and milked for all it is worth , rates and expenses for everything has climbed without restriction. What a crock that they suddenly made some savings, the biggest savings we could make would be to get rid of Marie Gordon , and employ someone practical, who can walk up to a problem, assess it for what it is and decide quickly what is needed to fix the problem.... Go back to the office make a couple of lists delegate the jobs and get it done... No consultants, not waste of time waiting ( and paying for security guards) no profit margins for every layer of ass covering ... It's how it is done every day by those of us who work in the priuvate sector.... we make decisions and get it done...call for some quotes to make sure we get the very best prices and pay the bloody bill and move on. The people doing the job do it for the best price because they know that they will be scrutinised and there will be checks and balances and NO PADDING. AND we don't have fancy opening ceremonies every time we fix the bloody footpath, or wash the car...and we don't make announcements in the paper trying to cover our asses.
HAMMER AND THE ROSE !
Posted on 18-06-2011 08:25 | By WOMBLE
HAMMER: How can so much spare dosh just be casually spread around from past years and "no one knows ..." then Oh we need this oh we need that ... the old question is that "how deep is this rabbit hole go?" ROSE: Let you know when I find one to give ! PS $110,000 of Geotech, WOW, like the report says "There was a slip, the dirt is now at the bottom of the hill ... hmmm plant grass and trees ok ?" Like we knew that already.
WOULDN
Posted on 18-06-2011 08:31 | By Hebegeebies
For the first time in living memory after considerable pressure was applied we see an itemised account for the work done. TCC must have been afraid of something to do that.The figures provided do not prove the repairs have been handled in a cost effective way nor justify any particular spending.Lets digest the figures, analyse them, make further enquiries and then perhaps informed comment will be justified.What we have now is at least a starting point.
PICNIC BASKETS
Posted on 18-06-2011 09:33 | By YOGI
The Mount is a nice place to wander, I guess that there was a need for a few to many picnic/snack baskets around the place. PROVEN LEADERSHIP ...
If thats an itermized account ...
Posted on 18-06-2011 11:34 | By Tony
Then we know where the problem now lies. How many hours of consultants did we pay for? Saying we spend 110k on Geo tech is not producing an itemised account, surely the people can see this for what it is.... Arse covering at its best while trying to fool the peasants.
OPEN YESTERDAY CLOSED TOMORROW ?
Posted on 18-06-2011 11:55 | By MISS ADVENTURE
TCC good planning department "NOT", all the money spent to now and just in time for the latest heavy rain forecast, likely all washed away again by tomorrow, where is all the FLOWERS gone ? Guess that means Wayne M will not comeup smelling of roses ... and will have to "Rustle up some spare dosh from another seceet "CACHE" corner for round 2 on Monday. PS Is Tania's brain still on holiday ? ?
saving
Posted on 18-06-2011 13:24 | By Rik
If the council reduced costs to help save money in the repair of Mount Maunganui why don't they do it for the entire council services recycling and reusing where ever possible. That saved money then can pay back any debt or put to services that are needed
A Glimmer of Hope
Posted on 18-06-2011 16:42 | By Fonzie
We are starting to see a little bit of info coming out now, thats a good start TCC has not kept ratepayers informed in the past and Sunlive can take a lot of the credit for this beginning of more transparency
THE FEEBLE GLIMMER
Posted on 18-06-2011 19:40 | By Vomit
I would look at it as something similar to the eclipse the other night, a bit like this ... "great expectations, but when it came to it all that happened was that it wll "went red, completely all into the red!"
Thanks & Apologies Cr Rick
Posted on 18-06-2011 22:07 | By Murray.Guy
Thanks for the thoughtful posts. Councillor Rick Curach, a couple of weeks ago, sought the support of elected members to have a target for the incoming new CEO, Ken Patersen, to reduce operational expenditure by $3 million. Some ridiculed Rick (read Faulkner's Corner), but the majority (including myself) did not support the resolution. The revelation that staff can reallocate (at their sole discretion) $650,000 plus, clearly suggests to me that Cr Rick's $3 target to identify areas of saving, re-prioritization was likely achievable over all departments. Cr. Rick, I apologise, ratepayers I apologise! I will endeavour to have a similar 'target' as a component of the new CEO's 'At Risk' key performance indicators (KPI's).
cynic ?
Posted on 19-06-2011 02:18 | By CC8
Murray, You are becoming ever so slightly cynical mate.... you should book yourself in for a few of the tea and bikkys junkets..... perhaps you could drive the bus??
FACTS FIGURES & FLIPPANCY
Posted on 19-06-2011 13:49 | By KAMIKAZE
Cr. Guy you are straying and not on the topic. What you need to do is take the Moultrie? figures break them down further and report back to us with the results.That would be meaningful am sure we can deal to it from there.
@ MURRAY
Posted on 19-06-2011 15:29 | By WARTS N ALL
You are right Murray but as the door is a fraction ajar on this Mount spendup for nowhere how about you kick the door wide open and show the full detailed report, we will then take them to the cleaner on it with pleasure, thanks Murray.
mount man
Posted on 19-06-2011 17:42 | By pwsimpson@kinect.co.nz
Good to see some Councillors showning concerns on the Cost. In my view they have been excessive and it all took far too long. It is a matter of finding the best practical solution and that is not done by paying big consultancy fees. The high fees just reflect that people are not using their initiative but focussing on covering their backsides at any cost - that applies to Council staff and the consultants. Under the constraints the worker to a great job.
Transparency
Posted on 20-06-2011 08:53 | By SpeakUp
Why don't I see even once the word 'tendering' mentioned? -Citizens Monitoring Council-
YES WHAT TENDERING ... ?
Posted on 20-06-2011 15:19 | By WARTS N ALL
Dunno how or where the $$ came from and of course a little trouble even seeing where it all went ...
@ MURRAY
Posted on 21-06-2011 00:59 | By TERMITE
We needed you on this job Murray, like the walkway, these POINTY HEAD boffins are a law unto themselves and while that continues rates will rise relentlessly for all ...
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.