Tauranga City Councillors have knocked back a $3million proposal to develop the marine precinct in the Mirrielees Road area.
In making the decision based on a staff report the council acknowledged it would be a long term investment with no financial return in the short term.
Marine precinct concept plan.
Lease holders of sheds in the development are being offered relatively short leases of only five plus five years, making them difficult to achieve a return on investment on.
The staff report heard by councillors presented the recommendation of an agreement in principle for a ‘basic' development of a hard stand area and 300 tonne travel lift.
It also sought an approach be made to the Bay of Plenty Regional Council for the remaining $3-5million.
The city council and economic development agency Priority One have for several years been trying to float the marine precinct concept for council waterfront land in Mirrielees Road.
It has failed to attract any backers.
The issue is understood to be tenure; council will not sell, but has so far failed to offer a sufficiently long term lease that will allow a private investor to make a return on an investment of several million dollars.
The council staff report recognises that while the travel lift and hard stand will create an immediate income, a full financial return on the investment is not expected in the early years.
Councillor Bill Faulkner says the investment is needed to replace the former 600 tonne slip that was removed to make way for the second harbour bridge.
'Since the slip closed there's been a significant lessening of the industry in Tauranga to the point where if we don't do something now, we are going to lose all of those little trades that keep boats going,” says Bill.
The travel lifts at the marinas handle the pleasure boats of up to 35 tonnes.
The bigger boats that would use the 300 tonne travel lift are instead departing for Nelson, Auckland and Whangarei.
'If we can get this thing off the ground we can restructure the marine industry in Tauranga.”
He favours the airport runway analogy used in the report.
'Nobody in their right mind invests in a runway on its own, it's the ancillary benefits,” says Bill.
'This precinct will offer the same incentives to the marine industry.”
The proposal to pay for the precinct from the sale of Glasgow Street properties and the Placemakers site was opposed by Wayne Moultrie.
Those sales were announced as a way of reducing council debt to instead invest that in a project that at face value does not seem to generate a return will be misleading ratepayers, says Wayne.
The motion to support the precinct in principle was lost on the vote.
Mayor Stuart Crosby and Councillor Terry Molloy were absent.



9 comments
Council is the skipper
Posted on 21-02-2012 18:00 | By Darth_Vader
of the Titanic it seems, not having a professional report available to make such a decision is comical to say the least ... yet the council decided to waste rate payers money putting in a path along the water front on the strand which will return ZERO income, yet they dismiss the opportunity of investors to provide a commercial asset and whom would be prepared to invest millions, which in turn would benefit the local economy greatly ... lucky this council isn't skippering any of the cruise ships that visit the port
True to form
Posted on 21-02-2012 18:09 | By Tony
But we will spenda Millon on a staue of a couple of Dogs....
Good on you for trying
Posted on 21-02-2012 18:19 | By Jack the Lad
Bill, at least you have the Tauranga marine and boating industry at heart, and its a pity the council could not give the TECT crowd only 4 million instead of 5, and give another sector of the community a chance, but there you go, maybe at one of your meetings you could mention to Wayne that its a little hypocritical to say reducing debt by selling a commercial site, and then give 5 million away, to appease another agenda, go figure!!!!!
Misleading ..
Posted on 21-02-2012 22:00 | By Murray.Guy
Likely all elected members support in principle the marine development proposal. Unlike Bill F and a few of his like minded Councillors, some of us do not regard the ratepayers assets, pockets and credit cards as the first 'port of call', to provide a gift of millions to assist a business case to stack up! The Priority One led initiative largely failed due to Council not including sale of the land options. Mayor Crosby, myself and others acknowledge that investors require security of tenure and a return on their investment, just as ratepayers rightfully expect - this being the case the TCC CEO is to discuss with Priority One sale options. Potentially a win / win. Ratepayers reduce debt and an excellent investment opportunity for commercial interests with freehold titles attached and no busy body councillor control freaks (basis of lease land option).
600 tons
Posted on 22-02-2012 08:19 | By hapukafin
replacment of the 600 ton with something larger is the only road to progress,why go smaller
Murray Guy, what about Baypark's $5 million?
Posted on 22-02-2012 08:58 | By Gee Really
Why not apply the same concern for ratepayers pockets to the $5 million you councillors loaned to Baypark, not to mention the unknown ratepayer dollars Council purchased a Speedway business with?
Staff
Posted on 22-02-2012 10:40 | By CC8
The problem is the staff idiots they "rely" on for their information. If they cannot find a way to cover their asses they make non committal, poorly researched and often completely wrong decisions. What is wrong with these councillors? They approve millions of dollars for non productive museums and art galleries and buy up ( and tie up) the land essential to create a proper marine park ( read JOBS and tourism, off shore income etc) ....and then expect private enterprise to build, promote and operate to recover costs and make a profit inside of a five year lease.........dreamers. Stupid civil servants meddling in private enterprise once again.
Opportunity Missed
Posted on 22-02-2012 13:26 | By scottmss
The marine industry in Tauranga is almost gone. We watch as businesses close one after another. They have no draw card. Not only did we take the 600 Tonne Slipway we built a low bridge stopping road access. We couldn't have done a better job of shutting them down. So the point is we as a community cut them off to tread water. The least we can now do is help pick them back up.
Gee Really
Posted on 07-03-2012 21:13 | By YOGI
Baypark was $5m is that all, what about the initial $12m to buy the disaster in teh first place, what about Councils ow figures that show millions more will be needed in every year from here on. Lets be up front about Baypark, the $5m is just the first installment of what will be $5m each and every 2-3 years, it has to be as it looses money and the longer it continues the more it will be.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.