The ‘she'll be right' attitude thought to be behind thousands of costly building gaffes is being run out of town from Thursday.
That's the date from when any structural work on houses will have to be done by ‘Licenced Building Practitioners'.
It's a government change that ratepayers and the public will end up paying for, says Tauranga City Council building services manager Rob Wickman in his report to the council's projects and monitoring committee meeting on Monday.
'There's going to be quite a lot of extra paperwork and administration for us,” says Rob. 'Nobody really saw that – but it's coming.”
House repairs or alterations that are structural, or affect a building's weather tightness may from March 1 be required to be undertaken by a Licensed Building Practitioner.
It means an LBP must design or carry out the work.
The council will be checking the licences of the designers, and builders and associated trades.
As well as checking the people involved are licensed, the council is also tasked with checking the design is by a licensed practitioner and assigning the design a licence number.
Rob's got all available staff working of the last minute flood of building certificate applications under the existing legislation. Anything received after Thursday will be under the new rules.
The change affects anything not under schedule one of the Building Act, says Rob, which means there is still room for some DIY work about the house. The new rules also don't apply to anything over 10 metres tall.
'Commercial or industrial buildings don't have to have a licence,” says Rob.
'I will let you think about that.”
The changes, which are designed to remove ‘cowboy' operators from the building industry, are part of a raft of changes endeavouring to remedy some of the features of the building industry that resulted in the leaky homes phenomenon.
Poorly designed and built buildings leaked, drawing the agencies that approved them and people who built them into costly legal actions.
One of the ironies of the new regime is that the professionals; the designers, registered architects and professional engineers are either fast tracked into LBP status, or receive it automatically.
The builders themselves have to first pass an apprenticeship and then five years' time in the industry before they can be registered as an LBP.
Complaints about shoddy work can result in fines and or people being barred from the industry.



7 comments
Bureacrats know best wink wink
Posted on 28-02-2012 08:08 | By wreck1080
Last time the bureaucrats changed the rules we ended up with 20 billion dollars of leaking housing. Don't assume standards will improve just because the bureaucrats are trying to justify their jobs. All these people will be long retired when problems start to bite.
Its what they want
Posted on 28-02-2012 09:26 | By Jack the Lad
rule changes only suit the bueracrats, so Rob all extra paper work is only what you want to keep yourselves in work, I have served an apprenticeship and have had the years required in the building industry during the 70s, and can read plans and specifications, so besides an inspector passing my work, why is there a need for more paper shuffling, and why cannot you accept my papers, rather than asking me to give you more money for another card, which tells you the same thing.I do not practice my trade anymore, but I would like to be able to if required do a few alterations around my property without having you telling me what to do!!!!
Selfserving bureaucracy
Posted on 28-02-2012 10:38 | By SpeakUp
There are century-old buildings constructed with genuine craftsmanship (learned through apprenticeships) and without paper shufflers imposing their smokescreen of regulations that only feed the administrative apparatus but do little for sound structure. Only direct accountability and liability of builders will uphold proper craftsmanship. This country is being ruined by too many penpushers.
?
Posted on 28-02-2012 10:45 | By tonyb1
How will this effect applicators of texture, if that is not done correctly the rest is just a load of bull.... ?
What???
Posted on 28-02-2012 14:25 | By penguin
Does this mean that buildings over 10 metres high will leak less than low ones, and are therefore exempt from the new rationale???
to many pens
Posted on 29-02-2012 07:55 | By Capt_Kaveman
the builders at evens rd or Te Akau ki school knew of the problem it was going to have and were told to build it anyway so i think more rules towards the pen pushers
penguin
Posted on 05-03-2012 13:52 | By penguin
Here's a thought. All the leaky buidings in Tauranga (including add-ons to existing structures) were planned, permitted and built by people with "knowledge" and "qualifications!" It's a bit rich suggesting that the 'laymen' need to be controlled to avoid such disaters...
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.