Council assures Maori of input

A glimpse into looming constitutional changes in local government was presented at a recent Tauranga City Council open forum this week.

Puhirake Ihaka, representing Tauranga Moana iwi, spoke briefly to the council's policy and strategy committee on its coastal reserves management policy, requesting iwi he represents be kept in the loop about the progress of any review of the policy.


Mount Maunganui.

The reason is the treaty issues for local iwi are up for settlement, and part of the changes in the wind are a greater recognition of local iwi status as treaty partners in governance and environmental issues.

Tangata whenua are already involved in discussion with and attended council workshops on the reworking of the coastal reserves policy.

The tangata whenua representatives want that process to continue, and that was the nature of Puhirake's request.

He says for example, there is particular Maori interest in Liesure Island's future.

A former railway quarry and dolpinarium, Moturiki is also an historic pre-european double pa site.

'It has much significance to us in terms of the future use of that area,” says Puhirake.

'There are things that relate to some of those reserves that are very topical in Tauranga today and also in some of the other things tangata whenua are pursing through the treaty process.

'I'm not saying there is necessarily a link.

'Basically we wish to remain in the loop and keep that dialogue going between us and the council so we do have some way of inputting into the plans whenever they are made.

'We feel that by remaining in the loop in terms of dealing with council, the relationship with council will probably advantage us when its gets closer to the end in terms of deciding things.”

Because of the economics as well as the politics, the councillors were intending to separate Mauao out from the coastal plan and put the rest aside for 18 months and resume the discussion while making allowance for any changed of status.

Councillors gave Purirake their personal assurances he will be kept in the loop.

'I think the point he is making, which I think is valid, is that they may be wanting to avoid the situation where if things are going to change, they don't appear to have changed subsequent to the treaty settlement, that they want to work together now,” says Councillor Larry Baldock.

'If there are issues they want to see changed in the future, they want to do it now through a partnership with us, rather than be seen to be, ‘Oh, they've got their settlement and now they want to make changes' – which may ruffle more feathers in the community.

'I don't know if that's personally enough reasons to go ahead now, but I think it's worth considering because we do want to avoid ruffling feathers when we can.

'When we get into co-management and co-governance of natural resources which is the harbour, these are the issue which iwi may bring to the table.”

There could be a desire to demonstrate to the Office of Treaty Settlements that there is a good relationship between Tauranga Moana tangata whenua and the council, says Mayor Stuart Crosby.

'But in saying that, the rational thing is to wait for six months time and see what arrangements have been made,” says Stuart.

The current plan was adopted in 1997 and covers coastal regions from mussel rock to the TCC boundary at Papamoa East.

It is overdue for a review process which will involve public consultation.

The revised plan is also intended to include Pilot Bay, Mount Maunganui Main Beach, Moturiki and Hopukiore (Mount Drury).

They are currently included in the Mount Reserves Management plan 1998 along with Mauao.

Mauao will in future have its own individual plan to reflect the different level of management requirements and issues.

The council deferred taking the plant to public consultation he plan, but will check the lie of the political landscape every six months or so.

5 comments

this

Posted on 21-03-2012 00:53 | By Capt_Kaveman

is why this country gets no where


Its not enough

Posted on 21-03-2012 09:06 | By Rangi

The Treaty & any constitutional review would have this as a minimum. Actually, wouldn't the treaty allow Maori 50% influence & the other 50% made up of however the Crown wished?


Ridiculous

Posted on 21-03-2012 15:12 | By Jitter

Rangi wants 15% of the population to be given 50% of the say/influence ! Amazing ! They want a big say but don't want to pay anything towards any maintenance.


@Jitter

Posted on 23-03-2012 19:10 | By Rangi

If you look closely at our "respectable democracy" you'll see that less than 10% of the population has 90% of the wealth. So what is your point? My point is, why draft a contract or treaty, which costs you nothing but the other party everything, & not honour it? Nobody disagrees with paying reasonable maintenance costs. Our council's debt recovery problem can not be described as such. Failure would be more accurate. Have Maori been given the opportunity? Nope! Why not? Dunno! I'm all for the Maori renaissance. The status quo is simply not working for Maori or Pakeha.


Jitter on Maori input

Posted on 05-04-2012 08:18 | By marama

How would Jitter like it if we took back what was taken off us unconstitutionally and illegally and not let anyone else have access to our property? Thats the alternative to his 50% moans. Off course if it was pakeha land that was taken, they would be compensated 100% the value, not the miserable 2% being offered to Maori. Hei aha whats new in Aotearoa?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.