Chamber supports reforms

Tauranga Chamber of Commerce CEO Max Mason believes there are many positives to the local government reforms announced by Nick Smith.

'The four well-beings responsibilities imposed on local government in 2002, created an unrealistic expectation that councils could be all things to all people.


Max Mason.

'Yesterday's announcement focuses local government on core functions which mean the community will need to make some tough choices on what services are retained and what are discarded.

'This could result in more public engagement in local democracy, and more local charitable and community organisations being established to resource and manage the activities they are passionate about.”

The new emphasis is for local government to provide ‘Good quality local infrastructure, public services and regulatory functions at the least possible cost to households and business.' Max says some clarity still needs to emerge about what constituted ‘public services', but he understands economic development fortunately fits into that definition.

Strengthening mayoral powers was viewed as positive by Max.

'In Tauranga we have a mayor who is popular with the electorate, but has been hamstrung by only being one voice on the council.

'Now he will have more of an opportunity to drive the city in the direction he wants.”

An expert advisory group will be established to report on ways to better manage the costs of local government infrastructure, and Max says: 'I just hope they have people from this region on that group because of the huge experience gained here in infrastructure development.”

Another reform which is likely to appeal to Tauranga developers is a proposed review around development contributions and how they are used by councils.

Questions need to be answered over whether they are adversely impacting on business and job growth as well as adding to the problems of housing affordability.

Max also feels the process to streamline possible reorganisation of councils would be received well by the business community, particularly because of the emphasis on simplifying planning processes and efficiency improvements.

Establishing a local government efficiency taskforce would appeal to many people because of the onerous planning, consultation and reporting requirements of the Local Government Act 2002, says Max: 'and it's positive that the terms of reference will be developed in consultation with Local Government New Zealand.”

A more consistent approach to regulatory roles between local and central government will be developed by the Productivity Commission.

6 comments

I wish

Posted on 20-03-2012 11:42 | By bigted

To quote "The community will need to make some tough choices on what services are retained and what are discarded." Since when have the community had a real say? Even when something was put to a referendum the majority were overridden in our "best interest". Has council's amalgamation in Auckland helped anything? Regettably, I am lost for answers.


Hard to understand

Posted on 20-03-2012 12:46 | By Persephone

why Stuart Crosby is popular with the electorate, given his penchant for wasting ratepayers money on frivolity. TCC is, apparently, the third most indebted council in NZ. Hardly a high point on anyone's CV.


Why Bother?

Posted on 20-03-2012 14:10 | By The Sage

Why bother to ask the opinion of the Chamber on any of these matters? Just take the words consisitent, regulatory,consultation,infrastructure, economic development, impacting, reorganisation, affordability, then hang them together with some joining words and you will have the Chamber's views on everything.


...have a mayor who is popular...

Posted on 20-03-2012 14:12 | By SpeakUp

I'm on the floor laughing. A bunch of cronies and a herd of sheeple is no measurement of popularity. The only answer is to cut down the multiple layers of administration (what do we need several tiers of Council for?), cut their obscene salaries (Last TCC CEO 'earned' 500 000.- a year!) and that will have as side effect less delusional projects of grandeur. And Nick Smith is only worried that there is enough extortion money left for Central Government.


Reform from Nick Smith??

Posted on 21-03-2012 09:53 | By Gee Really

Come on, hasn't the man has just admitted writing a letter on ministerial letterhead as a reference for an old friend involved in an ACC claim? Not the sort of person I want overseeing reform of our councils.


What a Clown

Posted on 21-03-2012 15:07 | By Jitter

"The Sage" is 100% correct with his description of how the Chamber of Coomerce describes everything. They should all (The Chamber, Priority One, Smart Growth, BOP Tourism) all be given the same nickname. NATO - No action, talk only.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.