Ownership of TECT Arena at Baypark has been transferred from the Tauranga City Council to its council controlled organisation Tauranga City Venues Limited.
The arena opened for business in September 2011, and is operated by Tauranga City Venues Ltd. The arena was built using funding from TCC loans, development contributions and a TECT grant of $6 million.
Tauranga City Venues Limited now has ownership of TECT Arena.
The ownership transfer is in line with an earlier agreement between TECT, the council and TCVL that the $6 million grant was contingent on the arena being transferred to TCVL on completion. That way the full $6 million is applied to the purchase price.
The asset transfer does not include the site, which is on land leased by TCVL from TCC, granted when the stadium assets were transferred to TCVL in 2007.
The $41million arena is paid for by a $24 million loan and $11 million loan obtained by the city council, plus the TECT $6 million.
Described by councillor Catherine Stewart as 'smoke and mirrors accounting”, the capital and funding structure is to be a money-go-round. TCVL will issue $11 million of ordinary unpaid shares to Tauranga City Investments Ltd, and, in turn, TCIL will issue $11 million in shares to the TCC. The subscription price will be paid on the day of issue.
TCVL will issue $16 million of uncalled ordinary shares to TCIL which will in turn issue $16 million in shares to TCC. The subscription price is to be unpaid until a call is made by the shareholder for payment.
The city council acting chief executive will also initiate a two way loan under which TCC agrees to advance TCVL a sum to fund the balance of the purchase, about $24 million.
The settlement date is August 12 to coincide with the expiry of the defects liability period under the construction contract. Risk will pass to TCVL on the settlement date.
The move answers some of the challenges put to the council by accountant Ian Stevenson about the recipient of the TECT cheque.
In the ten year plan submission process, he asked for clarity over whether the TECT cheque to TCC was actually banked by the CCO, which would obtain tax credits unable to be claimed by the council itself. A related decision to give the CCO an additional uncalled capacity of $2 million may be in answer to Ian's accusation that TCVL has been trading while insolvent.
'What's happened since we originally set up CCOs is we have learned a bit more about how to properly set up these companies,” says Dean. 'That's not to say they are improperly set up organisations, but if we were to set them up from scratch there are things we would do to make provision for the uncalled capacity to be part of the funding of CCOs.”
In an earlier email to city councillors, Ian says the plan saddles TCVL with $24 million of new debt, requiring it to pay the council about $1.6 million a year in interest.
That will be in addition to operational losses, says Ian. He says only 20 per cent of the arena's operational costs are planned to be recovered from users.
Councillor Catherine Stewart says because of the amount involved she would have preferred to see in writing the legal and tax advice Dean Riley says he obtained.
When she asked why it wouldn't be left until the expected CCO review is completed, Mayor Stuart Crosby said the council would be breaching its agreement with TECT to transfer ownership to the CCO.



8 comments
BUSTED
Posted on 28-06-2012 17:56 | By TERMITE
Looks like a rather high level of panic has set in to make all look better than it really is and in so doing cover up the trails of mischief created to date at Baypark. End result though is a complete RORT of ratepayers with a continued failure of TCC and Councilors to create transparency for ratepayers on the purpose of the $18.0 million of free share money made available to TCVL from "Bank of Ratepayers" debt account, what exactly the legal and tax advise was that does not really seem to exist.
That same old feeling
Posted on 28-06-2012 21:34 | By penguin
And here we go again!
No adverse impacts
Posted on 29-06-2012 08:16 | By Murray.Guy
I voted against this transfer for a few reasons. Staff confirmed (twice) that there would be NO adverse outcomes should Council wait, and as respect of processes suggests, at the least, until the CCO (TCVL) review is complete. I sense assets should remain in the direct control of the Council (ratepayers), rather than the ratepayers disenfranchised but liable. The $70-80 million asset ownership will be used as a part rational to increase staff, salary and governance directors fees.
Nothing wrong with getting best deal for ratepayers
Posted on 29-06-2012 08:53 | By Phailed
I'm glad TECT chose to help fund the stadium, otherwise ratepayers would have had to pay the lot, or there wouldn't be a stadium. It's a much better deal than Hamilton got with its V8s or Dunedin with its stadium. I don't pretend all the ins and outs of accounting.
MURRAY
Posted on 29-06-2012 10:05 | By YOGI
Good on ya mate! But sadly the mess is still there and as you point out the behaviour of TCVL and also the Aquatics all display the same terrible results, repeat management failures i.e. the Hot Polls debacles where million so of ratepayers money was wasted deliberately without TCC/Councillor approval being in place first!
JUST TAKES ONE BAD DECISION
Posted on 29-06-2012 15:14 | By PLONKER
To buy the Baypark is one little we apparently innocent decision ... oh how wrong that was, now 5 years later $70-80m (Murray Guys figures) has been blown and not a chance to get that back anytime EVER!
Can't follow you Cr Guy
Posted on 29-06-2012 16:02 | By Phailed
Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't you a supporter of a $5 million Council guaranteed loan to Baypark/TCVL or whatever you want to call it?
interest
Posted on 02-07-2012 13:42 | By tonyb1
1.6 million a year in interest alone add that to the last 5 million and I dont think TCVL even turn that much over in a year ? maybe Mr Mcsweeney would like to grace these pages and explain how this is going to be paid let alone the principle
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.