Numbers of speed cameras are set to quadruple as NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) takes over their operations from police, the transport agency has said.
There are currently under 200 “safety” cameras on the roads, but the agency is “looking at going to 800”, in response to questions at the joint Nelson Tasman regional transport committee, says Director of regional relationships Emma Speight.
The figure of 800 will be moved to “over a number of years”, says Speight.
NZTA is calling them "safety cameras" in a Cabinet-ordered attempt "to shift the public away from perceptions that safety cameras are an enforcement, revenue-gathering tool".
“This is an area in which we are very interested in your views,” Speight told councillors.
“We can certainly start putting them onto state highways in this region if you’d like them in particular locations.”
At present, police operate safety cameras in New Zealand.
However, responsibility for this is being transferred to NZTA.
The agency has plans to augment both the number and the type of safety cameras, which will include point to point (or average speed safety cameras) red light, cameras that can detect mobile phone use and seatbelt usage, and static cameras.
Average speed safety cameras work by calculating vehicle speed across the length of a road between two or more cameras.
The time taken for a vehicle to travel between the cameras is measured, and the average speed calculated.
The agency is already rolling out point to point cameras on six Auckland roads, NZTA announced in October.
A spokesperson, in response to questions from Stuff, says a formal handover has not yet occurred, and is expected to take place from around mid-2024.
Safety cameras are “proved to reduce the number of people being killed and seriously injured on our roads”, says Speight.
New Zealand has the lowest number of safety cameras per capita, and is “in the bottom third of the OECD” for road deaths.
There will be strong community support for cameras if they are focused on safety, and not revenue gathering, says Nelson mayor Nick Smith.
He will like to see the NZTA and council staff work on sections with black spots and accidents, where speed needs to be kept under control, says Smith.
However, the “temptation” for agencies under revenue pressure, is to “clip” lots of people on main highways in spots with large volumes of traffic where there wasn’t a substantive safety issue, he says.
According to the agency’s website, it is currently “establishing the systems, processes and capability to enable functionality” to transfer safety camera operations.
While it will also process offences for safety cameras operated by other road controlling authorities (RCAs), the police will still have an enforcement role in radar and laser detection.
Point to point cameras are already being used in Auckland, and around the globe, and are very effective at maintaining safe speeds that are signposted, says Speight.
“In areas where you're seeing significant growth, and we’re still getting crashes that are causing harm ... they can be really useful.”
The use of average speed cameras in New Zealand has been enabled by the recent passing of the Land Transport (Road Safety) Amendment Act into legislation.
A six-month trial of mobile phone and seatbelt detection safety cameras was run across three locations in Auckland last year.
Data from the trial shows that of 12,870,563 vehicles, 199,515 mobile phone offences were recorded, and 43,444 seatbelt offences were detected.
According to the agency’s website, the use of safety cameras to enforce mobile phone and seatbelt offences is currently not permitted under the Land Transport Act 1998, and the Te Manatū Waka Ministry of Transport is exploring options to enable their use.
9 comments
Safety?
Posted on 15-12-2023 11:31 | By PGC
If they really are used for "Safety" then why are they not highly visible, their locations made known, and only used in places where it would be very dangerous to exceed the posted speed limit? Instead, they are hidden, their locations are not posted, and they are only used in locations where a driver may inadvertently drift over the speed limit. They are only used on downhill sections where a vehicle speed may drift above the limit, or on long straights or passing lanes where drivers try to get past that one vehicle that has been sitting at 20km/h below the limit for the past half hour, but has speeded up once an opportunity to pass for following vehicles presents itself. If they are going to increase their use four fold at least be truthful about their true use - revenue gathering!
"Safety" lol
Posted on 15-12-2023 12:18 | By an_alias
I love the quotes as that is exactly correct "safety", great Tui adv there in waiting.
Its about money and always has been.
I'm really surprised its not said to be "safe and effective" like another product that is a complete failure.
PC Crap
Posted on 15-12-2023 13:05 | By Yadick
Forget about being all PC and pandering with pretty words. Call it as it is. They're speed cameras. In our recent travels overseas they're everywhere.
If you don't like paying the revenue the answers quite simple, HOWEVER, I do agree with PGC about those that sit back unecessarily under the speed limit and then speed up at passing areas then slow down again - arrogant morons.
Not Safety cameras
Posted on 15-12-2023 13:06 | By Paul W2
If NZTA runs the "Safety " cameras like they do the roads we will all be quite safe and most won't be working. When I see "Safety cameras" I immediately think of "Revenue cameras" hidden out of site to catch someone who has just gone over the speed limit.
Voluntary Tax
Posted on 15-12-2023 15:44 | By WelcomeBay
To say these cameras are for revenue gathering is wrong.
At the end of the day it is a voluntary tax, if you get caught speeding or breaking any other traffic rules you pay the price. People need to learn to control what they can control.
You cannot control the speed of vehicles in front of you, you can only control how you react to it. Your destination is a fixed point, it's not going anywhere. If you travel at 80km/h or 100km/h you will get there, If your in that much of a hurry maybe you should have left earlier.
Hey don't get me wrong I sometimes speed and I understand if I get caught i,m going to get a fine, simple as that.
M.Mouse
Posted on 16-12-2023 08:01 | By M. Mouse
I believe you need red light cameras
It is the general driving behavior what kills on NZ roads
I strongly believe that if you would install them around Tauranga and the Mount area (Hewletts Rd) you will have enough revenue to pay for them all and have profit yesterday I witnessed that 3 cars ran a red light in front of a traffic cop and there was no action taken by the cop bid sad to see that that you get pulled over on a straight Rd when you 5km over
@Welcome Bay
Posted on 16-12-2023 12:21 | By morepork
Very well written and accurate. I really enjoyed your post; it is good to see commonsense here and it needed to be said. I agree 100%.
Safety cameras
Posted on 16-12-2023 12:34 | By morepork
I find it a little insulting that an authority believes it can change the public perception of something by calling it a different name. Are we so moronic that we will fall for that? Speeding fines are a self-inflicted wound; you can moan all you like but it was within your power to NOT incur a fine. There is little doubt that the use of "safety cameras" currently is primarily for revenue generation. They are based on the arguable proposition that speed is always dangerous and must be stopped. It is NOT arguable that if damage is to happen, speed will make it worse, but there are times and places where speed is perfectly safe. The general discipline of drivers on the German autobahn is exemplary; they are aware, indicate their intentions clearly, and obey the law. But they also drive (legally) at an average 200 KPH.
The single most dangerous...
Posted on 16-12-2023 12:36 | By morepork
... component of any vehicle on NZ roads, is... the nut behind the wheel.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.