The floating glass box used as the Kestrel Landing will not be returning to its previous home at the south end of The Strand waterfront after council decided it would clutter the ‘new look' reclamation.
The box was removed from its waterfront location and taken to Tauranga Bridge Marina, where it is currently housed, when the lines securing the box to the wharf's piles broke during a storm with gusting winds of 100km/h on March 21.
A tug was called in to tow the floating glass box when it's moorings broke during a storm in March.
Tauranga City Councillors voted 8-3 yesterday to not allow the glass box to return to the waterfront saying they want to maintain an ‘uncluttered' look to the recently renovated Strand reclamation.
They also commented that the glass box was a totally unexpected addition when owner of the former Auckland harbour ferry the Kestrel Mark Scapens brought the Kestrel to Tauranga to be used as a restaurant in 2004.
Mark appeared before the council this week seeking an extension to his lease. TCC granted the landing pontoon a new lease on December 19, 2011, with the business required to be up and operating by September 30, 2012.
Since the application was granted the storm struck, the regional council announced Mark would have to go through a publically notified resource consent process, and he's embroiled in legal action over the failure of the piles.
Mark told councillors the publically notified process to gain regional council resource consent could cost from $10,000 - $140,000, and take months, over-running the September deadline and ruling out the landing's return to business this coming summer.
Councillor Catherine Stewart says it's time the council moved on, the landing originally arrived by default, and the waterfront looks better now it's gone.
Councillor Larry Baldock says losing the glass box is a lost opportunity, and that in future the council will still need a pontoon at the site for waterfront activities.
Catherine's view had more support, with eight councillors voting to not extend the lease.
Speaking afterwards Mark Scapens says activities attract people to waterfront sites, and he asked how the council is going to cater for the waterfront activities in the future.
'You can only bang your head against the wall for so long,” says Mark.
The sticking point in all his struggles with the council over the Kestrel and the landing was the inability to obtain a long term lease.
He says the same issue will continue to discourage any other waterfront enterprises.
'If you don't have ten years you don't have anything.”
He's been paying rent on the site since the March storm, which effectively ended the Kestrel landing's ten year occupation.
The Kestrel, and the landing, arrived in 2004 and departed November 2010.
Mark said at the time the council's refusal to offer a viable term meant no business owner was prepared to invest as there was no insurance there was enough time to recoup.
An earlier restaurant business failed, leading to a court case in which Michael Colosimo was sentenced to two and a half years jail for using forged papers to overstate the business profits.
The Kestrel then remained vacant for two years before being towed away by Auckland based Kestrel Preservation Society.
The glass box remained, and looked to have a new life as the focus for commercial recreational waterfront activities including jet boat tours and sea kayaking when the storm struck.
It is now currently located at the Bridge Marina B Pier.



7 comments
What's going down here then
Posted on 24-10-2012 14:19 | By Scambuster
This glass box has no RMA consent to be on the Strand and had to be removed when the Kestrel went in 2011. That didn't happen until the storm hit earlier this year. How on earth could TCC Councillors even consider a lease in these circumstances??
It would make a great Council Chamber
Posted on 24-10-2012 15:10 | By YadaYada
Murray Guy could keep the glass clean so we can see what the Council is really up to.
coronation pier
Posted on 24-10-2012 15:32 | By earlybird
what I want to know is when will we have a replacement for Coronation pier which was demolished a few years ago on the promise that a new pier would replace it. The pier added character to the waterfront, unlike the hideous glass box. Come on Council, tell us when it'll be built.
Just shows...
Posted on 25-10-2012 08:38 | By SpeakUp
...that these council functionaries have NO CLUE about business. How could they. Either they never ran one or they went broke and now leech of the public purse, tyrannising enterprise with their stifling visions of how a community has to be, according to their narrow-minded, provincial, limited apparition. This town would be better without them.
At last it is gone ...
Posted on 25-10-2012 12:02 | By Secret Squirrel
Although this is a glass box, TCC has played a game of smoke and mirrors. Sadly for TCC there are some who have seen right through this charade. The cost to ratepayers for this and all related is a shocker.
RMA CON-CENT?
Posted on 26-10-2012 18:15 | By PLONKER
Like the Waka pole that fell across the railway lines, there is no process, no plans, and nothing to anchor this one in its rightful place. Watch this space for the bills to rack up and onward on this.
BURN TO WATER LINE?
Posted on 30-10-2012 22:03 | By YOGI
Would perhaps be a cheaper option, certainly would then dispose of the eye-sore!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.