Tauranga stadium to be delivered in stages

An artist’s impression of stage 2 of the stadium that has no timeframe for delivery. Image: Supplied/TCC.

 

Plans for a stadium in central Tauranga have been scaled back and construction pushed out because of budget constraints.

The community stadium at the Tauranga Domain will now be built in two stages and construction won’t begin until 2033.

Budget constraints were caused by the need for Tauranga City Council to provide water infrastructure beyond 2026 because the government repealed the Three Waters legislation.

Stage 1 of the stadium included, 5500 new seats, new community spaces and a cafe, a new hybrid turf sports field and an improved entrance.

One of the buildings would also be repurposed for the University of Waikato sports science faculty.

The initial proposal was for a $220m stadium with 7000 permanent seats and 8000 temporary seats. It also would have included an exhibition centre, a community multi-use facility with changing rooms and lounge space, and a sports science/physiotherapy space.

Construction of this stadium would have begun in 2026, but last year the commission opted to take a staged approach to the stadium with the build starting in 2029.

This was pushed out further to 2033 at the Long-term Plan 2024-34 (LTP) deliberations last week.

Commission chair Anne Tolley said it was “sensible” to do the stadium in stages. Photo: Alisha Evans/ SunLive.

Commission chair Anne Tolley said the sensible thing to do was push out the timeline for the stadium and do it in stages.

The council consulted on the community stadium through the long-term plan and the majority of respondents didn’t want it.

Of the 1189 responses, 56 per cent wanted the stadium removed from the long-term plan. There were 43 percent of responses that supported a stadium either staged or delivered in one go.

The stadium was also met with opposition from affected sports clubs during the LTP hearings in February.

The Tauranga Bowls Club, Tauranga Croquet Club and Athletics Tauranga would need to be relocated from the domain at a cost of $21m.

Garth Mathieson of the Tauranga Millennium Track Trust said the proposed stadium wouldn’t have enough parking and couldn’t be expanded to keep up with the growth of Tauranga.

Nearby Rotorua had a 20,000-seat stadium and a much smaller population, he said.

Garth Mathieson of the Tauranga Millennium Track Trust said the community stadium would be a “second regional rugby stadium”. Photo: Alisha Evans/ SunLive.

“Let's call the community stadium what it is, a second regional rugby stadium,” said Mathieson.

The trust fundraised and built the all-weather athletics track at the domain.

The Tauranga Lawn Tennis Club would no longer have courts relocated with the stadium’s staged approach but it opposed the loss of green space.

Tauranga Lawn Tennis Club, club captain Michel Galloway said the greenspace at the domain should be left as a legacy for future generations.

The stadium would result in a loss of the community sports that operated from the domain, she said.

The track trust, tennis and croquet clubs formed the Hands Off Tauranga Domain alliance and held a protest in March last year. Around 500 people turned up to support the cause.

At the deliberations, Shannon Joe head of design at Jasmax, one of the design consultants for the stadium business case, said the stadium was people centric.

“This is a stadium for everyone and dubbed as the community stadium.”

An artist’s impression of the stadium for weekday use. Image: Supplied/TCC.

The new design had a plaza entrance and “strong relationship with Cameron Road.

Joe said the area wouldn’t be used for just sporting events or concerts and could be the “perfect venue” for Sunday brunches or markets.

“One of the key objectives was to make sure that this proposed development would open its doors. It would not seem privatized, but feel very public, very inviting and welcoming.”

Tolley said she loved the openness of the design.

“It's interesting that people talk about saving green space. It [Tauranga Domain] is at the moment a very closed off place, that is covered with buildings and used by members of small clubs.

“What you've done is you've actually made a public space.”

Stage 2 would increase seating to 7000 and be expandable with 8000 temporary seats. It would also include the exhibition and function space, community multi sports facilities and enhanced player facilities.

The expected cost of delivering Stage 2 is $157m but this has not been budgeted for because it isn’t included in the 2024-34 LTP.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

12 comments

The Master

Posted on 11-03-2024 18:15 | By Ian Stevenson

To much reckless spending already (not related to 3-waters) is the real cause.

Rampant spending 24/7 on waste of time and space nice to haves is the real issue...
- New staff palace...
- Museum that is anti-referendum
- The remainder of Willow street is to be covered in ratz-artz builds that will be like a massive black hole to build and then operate. we are looking at $300m "TCC Planned (means completely wrong and understated) + $52m upgrades (in the afternoon when approved) and then by the time all the nice to haves are added, actual cost bill by the favoured contractors, this will cost ratepayers some $500-600+ million initially (borrowed = debt = interest....) and annually somewhere around $60-80m/pa in losses etc added to rates.

You can expect rates to increase by 3+x by 2034


Ridiculous

Posted on 11-03-2024 20:50 | By Kancho

So just read we don't have enough money for water infrastructure as 3 waters is cancelled . Water is essential core business of council . A stadium is not. Nor do stadiums generally make any money but are an on going cost. The council also talks if 16 percent increase which will go in housing costs for everyone. Get rid as soon as possible and the new council look to essential services not vanity spending by ex government undemocratic plants


Why

Posted on 12-03-2024 09:37 | By Andrew64

Are these undemocratically appointed commissioners even talking about out a plan for 2033. You will be gone in July and your plans with you. Off with you and never come back.


not needed in town

Posted on 12-03-2024 10:18 | By Raewyn

The place for a stadium should be like the old rubbish dump on cambridge road plenty of parking space and assess to Takitumu drive


random thoughts

Posted on 12-03-2024 11:33 | By OG-2024

1. New ELECTED council can follow Govt lead and REPEAL the infamous 4's dirty deeds.
2. Photo in story shows just how little green space we have in the area and the "4" want to get rid of more??!!
3. is not the current entry gate a memorial for war dead and as such should the "4" not be paying a damn sight MORE respect??!!
4. @Andrew64 100%,
5. Essential to survival = roof, food, water... Elected council need to focus on what will best provide the essentials not the nice to have money drains that the "4" are locking us into.
6. IF we NEED a new stadium, WHY not put it out in Tauriko where there is a mas of development going on and then the roads etc can be designed to give access and PARKING without killing of sport clubs with forced removal!


What was the last pronouncement

Posted on 12-03-2024 12:39 | By Let's get real

Oh yes... University students will revitalise the CBD.
Professional sport should come out of the shadows and tell us all how much they are paying for the project and what will happen to the high performance centre and training grounds at Blake Park.
I read an article this morning that the 400 museums and galleries around the country were struggling financially and seeking additional funding and yet we are looking to join the financial mess that other councils are in, supporting the arts, museums and empty "public" spaces.
How about NO...


What for?

Posted on 12-03-2024 13:07 | By phoebe12

Who actually asked for this stadium idea?


Unacceptable

Posted on 12-03-2024 15:01 | By aratonga

These "monument builders" have now become absolutely unacceptable. Why do we have to wait until July to be rid of them? They should resign now - their function is fulfilled. By what right do they purport to plan for a stadium in 2033? The population voted against it. Apparently the commissioners think they are entitled to "know best". Of course their outrageous remuneration will continue - could that be the reason they are hanging on!
An observation - whenever we see a picture labelled "artist's impression" - usually some ambitious scheme for the "development" of our city it shows many people milling about supposedly enjoying the new facility. This is just a gimmick designed to sell the scheme.
You never see such crowds in those spaces. Such "impressions" are totally unrealistic!


@OG-2024

Posted on 12-03-2024 15:30 | By morepork

I concur 100% with your random thoughts. We know that the majority of people in the community don't want a stadium at this time, the assumptions in the Business Plan where shown to be flawed and spun when it was published (I remember posting here on it...), and yet planning for it is still going ahead. We know there is a water crisis, and yet there has been NO COMMENT from the commissioners or TCC (or anyone representing them) regarding the possibility of a desal plant, or a feasibility study for one. Instead, the cancellation of 3 waters becomes a political excuse for raising rates and delaying in water management. Why aren't we addressing ALL options for solving the water problem? Instead, another vainglorious Commissioner's project takes priority, even after the public response showing it is unwanted... Roll on July.


So Much For Consultation

Posted on 12-03-2024 17:31 | By StuartR

...and so much for listening to the community. Such contemptuous disregard shown once again for the majority view. Zero confidence left in the governance of our city.


Stadium traffic

Posted on 12-03-2024 18:43 | By CliftonGuy

As Cameron Road is the only access to the domain, any large event there will result in a traffic jam both back up the road and down to the motorway intersection.
See the traffic control measures necessary for the "One Love" festival, and imagine that for every large event at the domain - up to once every fortnight!
The domain is NOT the right place for such a development.
This concept is only going to line the pockets of the developers pushing for this to happen. It has no long term viability.


Monument to dictators

Posted on 13-03-2024 08:53 | By an_alias

Its clear when you don't represent anyone you have no regard for the amount of money and debt you create. After all your still getting paid incredible amounts per day, what do you care.
Councillors are meant to represent the people and be a check and balance to the grand plans that TCC comes up with.
This all shows why socialism and communism always fail, they run out of other peoples money.
From the picture YOU only have to ask where will all the people park ?
Are they all to walk, bike and scooter ?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.