Council pushes for taller buildings in the Mount

Six storey buildings could be allowed around the Mount Maunganui shopping area. Photo: NZME.

Six storey buildings could be permitted in downtown Mount Maunganui after the commission rejected an independent hearing panel’s recommendations.

Tauranga City Council is proposing to raise the allowable building heights in Mount Maunganui North as part of Plan Change 33.

Heights of six storeys are proposed in the shopping area and within 400 metres of it, then four storeys between 400-800m of the shops.

Based on submissions, a four person independent hearing panel recommended retaining the current building heights of three storeys.

It was one of six of the panel’s recommendations that didn’t align with council’s recommendations under the plan change.

Submissions on the increased heights in the Mount raised concerns around traffic congestion, air pollution and a lack of infrastructure.

Greater building heights and intensification would also impact the “unique character” of the area, submissions said.

The commission rejected two of the panel’s recommendations at a council meeting on Monday.

These will now be referred to the Minister for Housing for a decision.

The commission was required to give its reasons to the minister for rejecting the panel’s recommendations.

Higher building heights in Mount Maunganui North would create more development opportunities, which would improve housing affordability, the report highlighting the reasons said.

It would also contribute to the city’s development capacity requirements, which is how much land a council must have available for housing and commercial activity to meet demand.

While taller buildings may not be built in the short term, if the greater heights were not permitted the council risked being unable to meet its long term development capacity, the report said.

Classic Group director Peter Cooney. Photo / George Novak / Bay of Plenty Times.

Tauranga developer Peter Cooney previously told Local Democracy reporting apartments wouldn’t create affordable homes.

“You will not create affordability, especially in Mount North, just because the cost of the land so expensive and to go vertical is extremely expensive.

"As soon as you go above three levels, the construction changes and it's horrendously expensive," the director of Classic Group said.

The commission also rejected the panel’s recommendation around removing a height limit in the city centre.

They wanted to keep the 16m height limit on the block of land from McLean Street to Spring Street between Willow Street and The Strand

This was to ensure amenity of the waterfront and prevent shading from buildings.

The site is in front of the $306m civic precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa that is under development.

Plan Change 33 is in response to the Government’s medium-density residential standards (MDRS) that allows for greater intensification in urban areas.

Tauranga City Council city planning team leader Janine Speedy. Photo: Supplied.

City planning team leader Janine Speedy said, in Monday’s meeting, it was a significant plan change for the city in terms of housing intensification.

The MDRS allowed three dwellings to be built on a site as well as buildings up to three storeys without resource consent. 

The plan change was also to give effect to the government’s National Policy Statement on Urban Development, said Speedy.

For Tauranga this meant allowing as much height as possible in the city centre and greater heights and density around the commercial centres within other suburbs of Tauranga, she said.

Building heights between four and six storeys would be enabled in areas within five to 10 minutes’ walk of some of the city’s commercial centres including Bayfair in Mount Maunganui and Pāpāmoa Plaza.

Building heights of eight storeys would be allowed along Cameron Road in the Te Papa peninsula.

In the city centre, buildings up to 13 storeys could be built and eight storey buildings would be permitted within 1500m of the CBD.

Commissioner Bill Wasley said there were qualifying matters for the plan change that meant resource consents would be needed if buildings didn’t meet the urban design and impact requirements or exceeded the number of permissible dwellings on a site.

The rejected recommendations will be referred to the Minister of Housing for a decision.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

12 comments

A farewell present from a petulant Commission.

Posted on 21-05-2024 12:34 | By morepork

Proof again, (if proof were needed), that this commission doesn't listen to independent views and has no interest in preserving the character of either Tauranga or the Mount. There are plenty of places to build accommodation outside the cities, and the suggestion that building "up" will be cheaper is just nonsense.


Hmmm

Posted on 21-05-2024 15:52 | By Let's get real

Today I had to visit a business on Cameron Rd and after driving around for a few minutes to find a parking space (not knowing how long my meeting would take, I set an alarm for 55 minutes so that I could move my car and avoid a parking fine. The maximum time allowed was 1 hour) We had our appointment and drove around by Elizabeth Street onto Devonport Rd.
It was before Covid that I had been there last and I found the area to be oppressive and dark now, with the new constructions in that small area stealing the light and the feeling of open space.
Presumably with taller buildings in our most prestigious area, the loss of light and the feeling of being in a dark tunnel will become evident and will destroy the friendly open-air environment.
But obviously Council knows best....


Really?

Posted on 21-05-2024 15:56 | By Helo1

You can't even fix the roading and you want to jam more people onto a thin sliver of a peninsula???
Makes complete sense!!


Taller construction

Posted on 21-05-2024 16:21 | By tia

Frankly, the sooner these Commissioners are out the door the better. Higher buildings in the downtown area, is not going to solve the housing crisis it is only going to make it look more like the Gold Coast.


Does this….

Posted on 21-05-2024 16:38 | By Shadow1

never stop! Come on guys if it’s a good thing, it can wait until we have a proper Council. What’s the rush? I suspect it won’t get past our democratically elected council. Another couple of months won’t make any difference in reality.
The whole thing seems to be about the new retirement project that has been proposed in the Mount village.
Come on election day.
Shadow1


Sigh!

Posted on 21-05-2024 17:25 | By phoebe12

Leave a comment? Words fail me!


No words

Posted on 21-05-2024 22:05 | By Naysay

No words to describe the many lunches , cocktails parties and cultural reports that have brought you to this totally reckless decision. Not long ago you wanted to install paid parking at the Mount due to the congestion. Now you will ignite the Mount -for housing ?


Great

Posted on 22-05-2024 07:05 | By Inmediasres

The NIMBYs will be spewing!

God to see that common sense and progression outweighed self-interest protectionism.

Tauranga is no longer a big town. It's a small city and needs to start acting like one.

We can't keep endlessly sprawling outwards, destroying productive land irreversibly. We MUST densify upwards.

If you don't like it, there's many towns in NZ that are struggling that you're welcome to move to.


Not needed

Posted on 22-05-2024 10:30 | By an_alias

So make the problem of congestion worse, we need to fix the roading system first.
Is this the reason for destroying the CBD so there mates can buy cheap real-estate ?
We need a elected council to start bringing some push back to the un-elected and soon.


@Inmediasres

Posted on 22-05-2024 11:49 | By morepork

So, you support the destruction of a unique character and presence in our two cities, and call it "progress"? Many people love to live here and do appreciate the fact that both Tauranga and the Mount have their own signatures that are different from any other place in NZ, even though the Commission has determinedly tried to destroy it. It isn't NIMBY to value what is a treasure/taonga. Yes, we do need living space, but we don't need to have it in the centre of town. It will be years (if ever...) before we can get back the buzz and vibrancy of CBD shopping/dining and large vanity projects have nothing to do with it. Nor do high rise pensioner apartments in the downtown.
"We MUST densify upwards". Why? Why stop at 6 storeys? Let's build skyscrapers in our earthquake zone.
Your particular "upwards" is already over densified...


@Inmediasres

Posted on 22-05-2024 12:16 | By Let's get real

Once again, your support for council thinking is baffling to the point of being irrational.
Why redevelop the Mount area, when there are many other areas that are under construction or will be coming online for construction.
This is just a money making opportunity for developers at the expense of ratepayers AND, much more importantly, cruise ship passengers and other visitors to the area.
Personally, I'm sick and tired of visiting new cities and much prefer to explore older established areas with a less claustrophobic feel.
If your thinking is based on the current ethos being exhibited by council "planners" why keep The Elms, the old post office any of the Marae and why not put a cafe on the summit of the Mount (for the views).
Maybe many people actually enjoy some parts of the city where they don't live.


Take a look

Posted on 22-05-2024 16:46 | By Fernhill22

at all the high-rise apartment buildings around the Mount that are currently wrapped in plastic. There's a reason, in that the majority of these high-rise buildings are leaky and are having to have major work undertaken to fix them. This is a huge problem all across NZ & with buildings that aren't even that old having been built over the last 5/10 years. When the initial cost of land is so expensive to purchase in the Mount, I can't see how these apartments would be cost effective & providing affordable housing. As others have pointed out, the Mount has its own unique character and that's why people flock here because they like that it is a holiday destination. If you want to build high rise buildings, then use the land in the CBD you have earmarked to build a civic precinct on. This makes allot more sense than wasting$300m.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.