A local election overhaul is on the cards with four year terms, the end of postal votes, and a change in who runs the polls all up for consideration.
Local Government New Zealand has set up a group, headed by Nelson Mayor Nick Smith, to consider how best to improve voter turnout.
Smith says trust in democracy is faltering all over the world and it's "more important than ever" that the decline in voter numbers is tackled.
He also suggests the days of voting in a local election by post could end.
"There are also questions over the viability of postal voting with the decline of postal services and most people doing their business online," he says in a press release.
The LGNZ Electoral Reform Group is now looking to build support for reform from communities, councils and central government.
LGNZ President Sam Broughton says "serious reform" is needed, adding that voters will see more work achieved if council terms are extended to four years.
"Currently, local elections are cumbersome and inefficient compared with the general election.
"We also feel there is too much time and money wasted by having short three-year terms."
Who should administer the local elections is also up for review.
At present, most individual councils hire private companies to conduct local government polling.
But turnout has been in steady decline and elections have been undermined by several reports of people not receiving ballot papers.
In 2022, an unnamed North Island electoral official told RNZ that it was now time for the the Electoral Commission, which runs parliamentary elections, to step in and run local government elections.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
5 comments
Hmmm
Posted on 04-06-2024 10:00 | By Let's get real
There are pros and cons obviously...
Can you imagine a council that empties the public purse irresponsibly on vanity and empire building projects, being in charge of the budget for four years..?
Or a Councillor, more interested in their own agendas than the improvement of the city for everyone...?
Hmmm indeed.
Proof please
Posted on 04-06-2024 11:25 | By an_alias
How about you actually prove 4 years is better than 3.
Pure agenda for those former MPs to stay in longer in my view.
Having no say with the un-elected in power has shown the folly of what you are saying.
LGNZ are bureaucrats pure and simple.
Can you tell us who asked for this
Posted on 04-06-2024 11:26 | By an_alias
Please tell us all who exactly asked for this, the only ones floating this has been the un-elected 4 that I can remember.
Begging Pardon?
Posted on 04-06-2024 17:45 | By 3 eyed crow
In the wake of our last few council terms worth of time.....can we actually think this is a good idea? Poor council after poor council, and then to be burdened with the legacy of these commissioners .... Lets elect an unproven council and slot them in for four years with no overseer. Could we actually do it worse if we tried to?
@3 eyed crow
Posted on 05-06-2024 12:26 | By morepork
I think you make a good point. Now, for Tauranga, is not the time to do this. We need to elect the new Council and give them a chance. Then, if it is working, extending the term might be considered.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.