Tauranga City Council elected members have decided to use the Council’s traditional, value-for-money debt-funding approach to finance the Te Manawataki o Te Papa civic precinct redevelopment project.
Te Manawataki o Te Papa – the heartbeat of Te Papa – is a $306 million project designed to revitalise the city centre, which will see the construction of a new Library and Community Hub, a Civic Whare meeting space and a Museum and Exhibition facility in the civic precinct bounded by Wharf, Durham, Harington and Willow Streets.
Also included are landscaping and streetscape features, which will link through Masonic Park to the upgraded waterfront reserve.
The ratepayer-funded portion of the project cost is capped at $151.5 million, with the balance to come from grants, philanthropic contributions and asset realisations.
Mayor Mahé Drysdale says the original plan for funding the $151.5 million ratepayer portion of the project was to utilise the government’s Infrastructure Funding and Financing (IFF) Act to raise the necessary funds, with repayments to be covered by a levy on all eligible ratepayers.
“The decision to use IFF was forced upon the Commissioners because the Council had limited debt headroom under the Local Government Funding Agency’s (LGFA) debt-to-revenue limits," says Mahé.
"With the announcement that the Government looks likely to raise these limits, it will give us more capacity to borrow at cheaper rates, meaning we don’t need to use the more expensive IFF option.
“In an environment where interest rates are reducing, we don’t think it’s prudent right now to lock ratepayers into long-term debt at a fixed rate.
“The new Council has today [Monday] confirmed the importance of this significant project for the future of our City."
Mahé says council members are committed to injecting new life and economic activity into the city centre, "but we believe the Government’s decision earlier this month to explore raising the debt-to-revenue limits for fast-growth cities like Tauranga offers a better way forward, principally through lower borrowing costs"
“Essentially, this will allow us to finance vital infrastructure projects through LGFA, our traditional borrowing source, without breaching our debt limit."
Mahé says under the Government’s new initiative, Tauranga’s debt-to-revenue limit is set to rise from 285 per cent to 350 cent.
"That will provide the debt headroom we need to prudently proceed on a number of projects, knowing that we will not be risking a breach of our debt covenant, with the negative consequences that would have on our borrowing capacity and interest rates.”
Mahé adds that it’s important that the Council is prudent with any borrowing, and gets “bang for our buck” with its investment decisions.
“Ultimately, debt does need to be repaid and we have to be aware of the impact that has on our ratepayers. However, debt is an important tool to spread the cost of new infrastructure over the life of the assets involved, so those that get the benefit are contributing and current ratepayers aren’t paying the full cost upfront.”
The IFF application for funding the Te Manawataki o Te Papa programme made to the Government earlier this year, following formal community consultation, will not proceed at this time and the Council will work with LGFA and the Government to have its higher borrowing capacity confirmed.
“Our expectation is that the higher limit should be in place by the end of November, but if that is not the case, we’ll look at other financing and funding options then,” says Mahé.
“We also need to confirm the implications of these higher limits on our credit rating and future borrowing rates.”
In the meantime, the mayor and councillors approved funding and financing arrangements at Monday's council meeting to allow the new library and community hub facility, the first of the major Te Manawataki o Te Papa projects, to proceed to completion.
“While this increases the debt on Council’s balance sheet, overall debt doesn’t change because we will just be using LGFA rather than IFF as the borrowing source, meaning the cost to the ratepayer will be less than it would have been had we proceeded with an IFF levy,” says Mahé.
“Amongst the key decisions made today, the council has also authorised the chief executive to enter into a contract with our construction partner, LT McGuinness, for the library and community hub.
“This is a project we have inherited from the Commissioners. We are working through each of these to ensure we are delivering the best outcomes for our people.
"There would be a very real loss to ratepayers if this project was cancelled or paused, so continuing it offers the best value for money and means we can continue to revitalise the CBD.
“From our investigations so far, we have confidence that this project is on-track to be delivered on time and on budget,” says Mahé.
“We also anticipate receiving a further report on a proposed civic whare and exhibition and museum contract for consideration later this year.”
23 comments
NOT WANTED!
Posted on 20-08-2024 08:24 | By Equality
"A proposed civic whare and exhibition and museum contract for consideration later this year.” Ratepayers have made it abundantly clear that we do NOT want these things! You say you will listen to the people - well do it Mahe!
And while saving money - that we haven't got - take a look at Sunlive's poll on the forms of transport we use. 88per cent of us use our CARS - less than 4% use bikes. Do you get that council? Please - no more b........ly cycle lanes!!
Sad to see no restructure
Posted on 20-08-2024 08:34 | By an_alias
Its looking like after living here 45+ years it might be time to move as the DEBT burden for rates is too much now and IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.
I see why Mahe doesnt live here.
OH GOOD
Posted on 20-08-2024 09:18 | By Alfa male
When has any project of this size ever been built “on time and on budget,” it won’t be like everything else that is built, it will end up costing us ratepayers far more than they want to say. It probably won’t even be effective in bringing people back to the city centre. Ongoing operating costs will also fall upon rate payers. This useless monument to the commissioners will be a burden on rate payers for years to come.
Bring back democracy
Posted on 20-08-2024 11:08 | By Fernhill22
Now that we have a newly elected council, where has the democracy gone. Where is the option for ratepayers to vote and decide once and for all whether or not they want to spend $151m on a project of this size & that adds no economic benefit. As with projects of this size & scale there will no doubt be a budget blow-out & then when you factor in that these facilities don't even bring in additional revenue but are an actual cost to ratepayers the money could be better spent improving infrastructure to get Tauranga moving again. This White Elephant vanity project could end up costing ratepayers for years. This is the first big mistake from the newly elected council and continues a trend of Tauranga City Council not listening to their ratepayers.
Tell Us Mahé
Posted on 20-08-2024 11:09 | By Yadick
How is this listening to the people as you said you would?
How is this going to bring on a thriving metropolis?
The only thing of any use to the city is the library. You'd be better off scrubbing the entire venture and closing off Devonport Road from Elizabeth St to the Starbucks roundabout and turning it into undercover shopping with street stalls, activities etc. Meeting rooms and art galleries, museums and statues are not going to cut it. You've absolutely lost my trust.
Hmmm
Posted on 20-08-2024 12:30 | By Let's get real
Does anyone watch the News, or read any form of journalism in council..? Maybe it's just solitaire or Facebook, whilst whiling away the time.
Te Papa, the national repository for useless items, is going to charge admission fees for overseas visitors. Because of INCREASING COSTS.
How about some rational thinking about the true cost to benefit, of all of these empty properties outside tourism season. And let's not forget that this is not the only empty building proposal on the table, as Gate Pa is yet to raise its ugly head once again.
Absolutely no forward thinking. It just appears to be a very expensive appeasement offer to Maori entities before they finalise their compensation claim for past grievances.
The flood of money hasn't even started yet.
Cautious optimism
Posted on 20-08-2024 12:48 | By morepork
It seems the discussion was sensible and the new Mayor is savvy in the use of financial instruments. The proposed development is a beautiful one, but whether it will "re-vitalise" the City or not, remains to be seen. The fact that a referendum on the museum rejected it, leaves a bad taste, but it is time to get over it and make the best of a bad commitment. To the layman a debt-to-revenue limit of over 300% seems impossible, but it really depends on the term for repayment and the value that is received by spending the money. If the "heartbeat" actually generates revenue then it may not be a bad investment. I share the concern of other posters regarding cost overruns but we have to see what happens. If the project is caefully monitored and managed, and there is transparency and accountability, we may yet get something worthwhile.
@opposed posters.
Posted on 20-08-2024 13:26 | By morepork
The new Council are reviewing projects currently in progress (WIP) and that's a good move. It is not realistic to expect a referendum on the proposed "heartbeat" right now. It has gone too far. I completely agree that it SHOULD have been referred to the Ratepayers BEFORE it was started, but it is what it is. I think all of us object to this spend because we see other priorities that would make more sense to us. Debt is a fact of Life for Tauranga, whether we like it or not, and the best we can hope for is that the debt is incurred effectively. The new Council has found a better way to incur this debt and it is an opportunity to get an amazing City centre, which may not come again. What started as a "vanity project", could yet become a major asset for all of us.
Hang on a bit…
Posted on 20-08-2024 13:48 | By Shadow1
…what is a “construction partner”? How does a contractor become one? Why would you enter into a construction contract without using the “competitive tendering “ process?
At least that would give you an idea of the finished cost so you could cancel it for the time being.
How many other “contracts “ have been let in this manner?
Any council staff member who thinks this process gives good value is short of a few brain cells.
Come on Mahē investigate construction tendering procedures before making such expensive decisions.
Shadow1
Democracy
Posted on 20-08-2024 14:26 | By Alfred the first
It's interesting reading the comments complaining about democracy. We just had an election and only 38.7% of eligible voters participated!
These new Councillors have been voted in to represent the best interests of all the people of Tauranga, sorry if they don't represent your one sided viewpoint. They have to deal with the decisions made by others such as the commissioners that came before them.
I'm a ratepayer that supports growth and getting the facilities that our city needs and should already have, and that have been denied by the 'no rates increases' cartel of the last 20 or so years. I didn't support everything the commissioners did but at least they pushed the city forward!
@shadow1
Posted on 20-08-2024 15:03 | By Let's get real
Substitute, City partners. Those that have paid council to become City partners and get preferential inside running to highly lucrative council contracts.
The goose that continually lays golden eggs.
Revitalise the city centre?
Posted on 20-08-2024 15:09 | By earlybird
Well the Farmers development didn't work did it, and the new civic centre project won't either. Look around the world people. City centres are not thriving anymore.
Realist
Posted on 20-08-2024 15:17 | By aratonga
Well,well, who would have thought ....!
All over the City there are commitments made by the late unlamented Commissioners and we will just have to wear the cost as best we can and in the most practicable manner. No doubt many will find they can no longer afford to live in Tauranga and will take-off elsewhere. The rest of us will just tighten our belts and continue to "cough up".
Hopefully, the new Council will review the rest of the proposed "developments" for the City in a common-sense way and not be deceived by pretty artists' pictures showing hundreds of non-existent "bright young things" flocking around misconceived projects. The Council must be strong to stand-up against local moguls and over-ambitious staff! -
The Master
Posted on 20-08-2024 18:12 | By Ian Stevenson
Another step closer to being a bankrupt city ASAP
The Master
Posted on 20-08-2024 18:13 | By Ian Stevenson
The amount of new debt $151.5m is a fraction of what it will cost ratepayers... what about the $60+m annually in operating losses? Who will pay that?
Will it be added to rates also?
The Master
Posted on 20-08-2024 18:14 | By Ian Stevenson
Why is there a museum, there was a referendum a few years ago that verified 60% against any CBD museum.
When was the new referendum to overturn that ratepayer decision?
Oh, I know, a week into it and "we are listening" just like the FRab-4 were "NOT" ?
The Master
Posted on 20-08-2024 18:16 | By Ian Stevenson
Wonder if the TCC staff have told the EM's about the $53m of extras, above the $303m?
TCC staff told the Fab-4 only after approval of he $303m... like that afternoon... talk about sly and some.
The Master
Posted on 20-08-2024 18:18 | By Ian Stevenson
Wonder if TCC staff have told the EM's that the $303m total costs is out dated, no quotes can be obtained, out of date costs, half not included and generally TCC staff will just do it all no matter the cost.
There wont be much change left out of $550m and some... total true, final cost.
Who is paying the gap thingy?
Result was clear
Posted on 21-08-2024 06:28 | By Naysay
Disappointed that this reckless spending continues . It was not wanted by the people your shareholders. The end result will be a decline in people living in Tauranga . The shift has started meanwhile our cousins in the Mount can't open their windows. Really ?
@aratonga
Posted on 21-08-2024 09:59 | By nerak
You have a handle on the crux of the matter - ' The Council must be strong to stand-up against local moguls and over-ambitious staff! '. So very, very true. The moguls you refer to are only, ever and always, interested in lining their own pockets. They have far too much sway over Council. The over-ambitious staff are the dreamers who have already created much mayhem throughout the city. The type that will maybe hang their heads in shame one day, as reality hits that their dreams should never have been given reality.
Isn't it great...
Posted on 21-08-2024 10:23 | By KiwiDerek
...to have our democracy back!
Tough.
Posted on 21-08-2024 12:21 | By Accountable
The Councilors have approved the spending of what will eventually be ratepayers money on the new civic center project of which is additional to amount of money needed to continually maintain the cities every day requirements. The cost to run the city in 2024/25 is estimated to be $573,000,000 and the civic center costs will be additional to that. That's why previous councilor Robson spoke out about the future unmanageable council debt but nobody believed him and got sucked in by the new council candidates that we have today. I am going to be the first to say I didn't vote for any of them and the majority of you who did get what you deserve.
slow clap
Posted on 22-08-2024 14:33 | By Howbradseesit
For you Mahe. What a shame you continue to not listen to the people you were elected to represent.
There was a small glimmer of hope you would be decent in the role. Unfortunately that hope has vanished now. You're just the guy from out of town that is out of his depth and on an ego trip.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.