Tauranga CBD revamp pushes ahead

An artist's impression of the $306 million precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa. Photo: Supplied.

A change in funding for Tauranga’s civic precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa could save ratepayers $1 million a year in interest.

The $306 million precinct in the city centre will include a library and community hub, civic whare - public meeting house, exhibition gallery and museum.

The commission applied to fund the $151.5m ratepayer portion of the project through an Infrastructure Funding and Financing levy.

The levy proposal was rejected by Housing Minister Chris Bishop in June because he said it was important the incoming council had their say on it.

Now the council will apply to the Local Government Financing Agency - LGFA -  to fund the $151.5m.

The LGFA provides a lower interest rate than an IFF levy, which would enable $1m yearly interest savings.

Borrowing through the LGFA was possible because the Government and funding agency are looking at increasing the debt limits, potentially up to 350% of revenue, for high-growth councils.

Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the new LGFA funding was a "very good solution". Photo: Alisha Evans, SunLive.

At a Tauranga City Council meeting on Monday, mayor Mahé Drysdale said using the Local Government Financing Agency was cheaper and provided more transparency than the levy because the debt was on the council’s books.

He said he was “very uncomfortable” with the levy because ratepayers could have been locked into a higher fixed rate for the next 30 years.

The need for an IFF levy was “forced” on the commission because of the lack of head room with the council debt limit, he said.

Drysdale said the LGFA funding was a “very good solution”.

“It’s going to be cheaper and ultimately we’ll save our ratepayers money over time.”

Drysdale said the council had an important role in investing in and revitalising the CBD.

There were significant risks to ratepayers if the council decided to pause or change the project, including losing $50m invested in the precinct build if it was stopped, he said.

There was over $1 billion in private investment in the CBD as the council’s desire to reinvigorate the area had given them confidence, Drysdale said.

Councillor Rick Curach wanted to delay the project to consult with the community. Photo / David Hall, SunLive
Councillor Rick Curach wanted to delay the project to consult with the community. Photo: David Hall, SunLive.

Councillor Rick Curach said he didn’t want to cancel the project, but he wanted to delay it subject to community consultation, and definitive answers from project partners to make a responsible decision based on community views.

Curach said it was largely a “vanity project” and he didn’t buy into the value of it.

He said he wasn’t convinced of the cost to delay or cancel the project and raised concerns about the affordability of it for ratepayers.

Councillor Rod Taylor said there was the potential for reputational damage if the council altered or stopped the project.

This could be from their iwi partners, council staff who had worked on the project for years and from the private developers investing in the CBD, he said.

“What would it say about us if we stopped this project?”

Tauranga Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular. Photo / David Hall, SunLive
Tauranga Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular. Photo: David Hall, SunLive.

Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular said the council needed to make sure it was adding value for the people of Tauranga.

“Are we progressing a project which they have been consulted on and … there has been very positive feedback about?”

Te Manawataki o Te Papa was consulted on in 2022, with 72 per cent of respondents wanting the full precinct to be built.

Drysdale said there was an opportunity cost and money spent on a project couldn’t be spent elsewhere.

“As we go forward it is important that we understand that, and we are prioritising the projects that we need in order to deliver for our people.

“I am confident that the project as it stands right now at about $306 million is currently on time and on budget.”

The remaining $154.5m for the precinct would be funded from grants, development contributions and selling surplus council assets.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

6 comments

Only one thinking Councillor?

Posted on 20-08-2024 15:04 | By nerak

We obviously need more Councillors like Rick Curach, who talks of 'community consultation', 'definitive answers' and 'responsible decisions'. In another article on Sunlive, Rick seemed to be the only one with a level head and commonsense. Are there no other councillors with these vital attributes? Mahe, you need to put your pen down and engage your brain in alignment with what the voters need, not what you think they want - it's already been said over and over, we don't have the $$ for the nice to haves. Even Jen Scoular said council needed to make sure it was adding value for the people of Tauranga. Continuing with vanity projects is not adding that value, whichever way Mahe likes to put it. Out with the old, in with the new, I wonder. So fretting over council's reckless spending is not over yet!


Different words, same cost centre

Posted on 20-08-2024 16:07 | By Corwen

Isn't "selling council assets" the same as "ratepayer funding"???


The Master

Posted on 20-08-2024 18:20 | By Ian Stevenson

Save $1 million? So $61m maybe is changing to 460m???? What a load a bull!

They have no idea of where the $60m annual costs/losses are going to be paid from.


The Master

Posted on 20-08-2024 18:21 | By Ian Stevenson

Above it says "Councillor Rod Taylor said there was the potential for reputational damage if the council altered or stopped the project."

Where has Rod been the last century? TCC has zero reputation on a good day... !!!!


Oh No

Posted on 21-08-2024 07:52 | By Thats Nice

What an absolute waste of money. How many people to you expect to visit this civic precinct and where will they park? I was hoping this crazy idea would be quashed but no, here we go again spending money we haven't got. I thought this new council was going to be "all for the people" but obviously not.


New Council wrong advisors?

Posted on 24-08-2024 09:16 | By Floyd

Although we realise the council is largely new they need to remember that advice received will be tempered with bias depending on a number of factors.
A large number of individuals and organisations feed at the rate payer funded trough and this tends to drive advice provided.
Councillors are unlikely to be told by council employees that staff or salary reductions are required.
Councillors are unlikely to be told by City Partners not to spend money on vanity projects or that too much traffic management is being used or Health and Safety is over the top.
Councillors will not be told by media to spend less on advertising.
Power companies are some of the worst at exploiting the general public so contributions from this source towards vanity projects just means those who pay for power and also pay rates are in fact paying in two ways.
It is always worth remembering that figures don’t lie but liars use figures!
Nanaia Mahuta’s commissioners performed as instructed spending ratepayer money at an alarming rate. I cannot recall any cost savings made or cost reductions achieved. I do recall them trying to gain extra revenue by further exploiting ratepayers.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.