A long-discussed plan to add a new direction-changing lane to a major Tauranga congestion chokepoint is one step closer to reality.
But a Tauranga architect who suggested the system years ago is concerned it’s now too late to work.
Tauranga City Council has submitted plans to NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi for three-laning Turret Rd, the Hairini Bridge and causeway to add a tidal flow system that changes direction with peak traffic, as well as four-laning 15th Ave between Cameron Rd and Burrows St.
The council endorsed the 15th Ave to Welcome Bay business case at a meeting on Monday.
The council is seeking 51 per cent of the $82.6 million cost of the project from NZTA.
Architect Mark Wassung approached Tauranga City Council with the tidal lane idea in 2017.
In his view: “It should have been done in 2017 or ‘18 with vigour and enthusiasm - not in 2024 when it’s been broken for so long”.
The bridge was a “terrible bottleneck,” and it was like a sewage pipe that backed up, he said.
Tauranga architect Mark Wassung said the tidal lane project should've been done in 2017. Photo / Supplied.
Wassung lives in Maungatapu and uses the bridge to take his daughter to intermediate school.
The car trip takes 25 to 30 minutes. If his daughter bikes it’s a 10-minute ride, but he did not believe the cycle lane on the bridge was safe because it was too narrow to pass another cyclist, he said.
Wassung said a four-lane road and bridge would be better in the long-term. He welcomed the cycling and walking improvements that will be done as part of the project, including a new ‘clip-on’ shared path on the bridge for cyclists and pedestrians.
Former deputy mayor Tina Salisbury lives in Welcome Bay and said she and her husband tried to time their trips outside of peak traffic.
What would normally be a 15-minute trip to the CBD could take an hour, she said.
Salisbury said she was happy a solution is finally on the table but also thought four lanes would be better.
“Do it once and do it properly and make it fit for purpose for 30 years’ time.”
The plans aim to improve accessibility between 15th Ave and Welcome Bay in Tauranga. Image / Supplied.
The Western Bay of Plenty Transport System Plan ranked the Turret Rd corridor fourth in terms of peak hour congestion, safety problems and walking and cycling deficiencies.
Turret Rd is used by 28,000 vehicles per day and 15th Ave by 21,000, according to the business case.
At Monday’s meeting, Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale said he was delighted to hopefully get some plans into a delivery phase as soon as possible.
“I have heard work is being done on Turret Rd for about the last 15 to 20 years, so it’s nice to finally have something happening.”
Turret Rd was a bottleneck, and it would be ideal for it to be four lanes rather than three, he said.
“The cost and the time that it would take to get that across the line is just going to kick the can down the road a little bit more.
“We’re better to get on and do this now.”
Council director of transport Mike Seabourne said it was about using the existing corridor more efficiently.
Four-laning the bridge was considered, but there were “serious barriers” including the environmental impacts of building in a coastal marine area and community feedback about the proposal.
Tauranga City Council general manager infrastructure Nic Johansson. Photo / Alex Cairns.
Council general manager infrastructure Nic Johansson said just making the bridge four lanes would cost more than $200 million and it was unlikely NZTA would fund this.
The 15th Ave to Welcome Bay corridor had a long history of congestion, poor levels of service, and access and safety problems, he said.
There was also a long history of potential solutions being looked at in the past, said Johansson.
The business case had been developed with input from NZTA and it had given advice about how to ensure it suited the new government policy statement (GPS) on transport, he said.
The NZTA board recently declined funding for the council’s $164m Cameron Rd stage two project because it didn’t align with the GPS.
Councillor Hautapu Baker asked how much the project would relieve congestion when complete.
15th Ave would become four lanes between Cameron Rd and Burrows St. Photo / File.
Seabourne said it was hard to put a finger on, but it would have a “material effect” on people’s journey times.
“They will save time travelling down this corridor at peak.”
Reliability would be improved which was almost more important than journey time, he said.
Councillor Rod Taylor asked how long the three-laning would provide capacity on the network.
Johansson said it had capacity for 20 years but that was if nothing else changed, most people still drove to work and other transport projects weren’t completed.
If those things changed the corridor would have capacity beyond 20 years, he said.
Tauranga City Councillor Rick Curach said progressing the project gave him joy. Photo / Alisha Evans.
Councillor Rick Curach worked with Wassung on the project in 2017. He said: “It certainly gives me some joy because a lot of water has passed under that bridge since we first started talking about it”.
Councillor Glen Crowther said during the construction phase there were “no good solutions” so the council needed to be clear in its communication with the community and come up with the “very best plan” they could.
He had concerns about whether NZTA would approve the business case because of the very limited funding and that Cameron Rd Stage 2 had not received its backing.
“I hope that this gets through.”
Stacey Spall, chair of the Bay of Plenty AA District Council, said their members have raised concerns about congestion in Welcome Bay and Hairini for some time.
Spall told Local Democracy Reporting the group was excited the project had been prioritised.
They hoped NZTA would look at the project favourably for funding, she said.
“We also think its got some pretty good bang for buck in terms of the infrastructure upgrades that will done at the same times.”
The business case will go before the NZTA board in October for approval.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
13 comments
Catch up Tauranga
Posted on 31-08-2024 09:51 | By NZoldkiwi
This would not have been rocket science to buy up the houses on Turret road and 4 lane it with a new bridge years ago instead of typical Tauranga playing catch up as usual.
It is still financially possible to buy up these houses. This should have been a priority years ago instead of all the millions wasted on projects that were all about councillors making a name for themselves.
Not a 5min job
Posted on 31-08-2024 10:14 | By Warped
Not sure people understand the implacations of this badly needed upgrade and effects everyone in the city will feel. Worst case this will be a complete road closure, yes i said completely shut! Best case a single lane that switches direction around mid day... and this will be for 4-6weeks. This project will literally break tauranga for a month to be done, it needs to be done but not sure the daily commuters will be willing to pay the physical cost to see little to no change in the morning, but a decent change in the afternoon
WB needs facilities not Turret tinkering
Posted on 31-08-2024 10:38 | By Captain Hottie
If there was a decent shopping centre with a supermarket, pub/restaurant, cafe, gym etc, people wouldn't need to use Turret Road to go to the likes of Fraser Cove. Turret Road on a weekend morning can get just as backed up as during the week because there's nothing in Welcome Bay. Also a new secondary school would also cut the traffic. I've been here over 20 years and in that time so much new commercial development has taken place - Bethlehem, Fraser Cove, Fashion Island etc. Welcome Bay has had precisely zilch apart from yet more subdivisions and road works.
Fly over
Posted on 31-08-2024 12:22 | By Angel74
Would it be possible to build up and over instead of introducing a new lane to the existing road??!!
Do it once do it right.
Posted on 31-08-2024 13:09 | By Alfred the first
Why does it always have to be a half pie solution? This is a main entry and exit and route through Tauranga. The better solution is to buy up the houses along Turret Road and build a proper 4 lane road with separated cycleway. Invest for the next 30-50 years, not just to catch up to where we are now.
The Master
Posted on 31-08-2024 13:56 | By Ian Stevenson
Let not forget that the wounds are deep on this mess!!
TCC desperately sold off the Route K toll road for $60m or so (losses every year to date), less millions in NZTA demanded road upgrades... the HUGE catch was that TCC had to take over SH 2A (15th Ave and Causeway which would no longer be a SH, but merely a city street then onwards) that the Government had already agreed to pay for it all, for some $48m.
Result, TCC got the money and spent it on "nice to haves..."
15th Ave etc was then delayed and so never happened. FABB-4 came along... not happened either.
Now above it says "making the bridge four lanes would cost more than $200 million"... so as usual yet another quality, well planned, perfect TCC outcome delivered on time, in budget, all objective met or exceeded....TUI-ADVERT!
The Master
Posted on 31-08-2024 14:03 | By Ian Stevenson
@ NZoldkiwi, 100% correct, the cost now for same-same is four times more. Of course part of that is that TCC is now involved.
@ Warped, yes indeed, but if TCC "plan" for 4-6 weeks then the actual "MESS" will be more like 3+ months and some. Actually building a second bridge (2-lanes) adjoining the existing would have the least interruption, but just can not allow that to happen, can we.
@ Captain Hottie - Not so, most traffic issues relate to school/work time congestion and horrible road design/layout. The mess will remain as is or worse.
@ Ange;74 - a flyover, perhaps you should have a look at Bayfair/Baypark, what NZTA/TCC "team have achieved, the time/cost/mess is unbelievable. have they learnt anything...NAH!
@ Alfred the first, because they have messed it up, pretending to do something, TCC-specialise in making bad worse, alot worse!!!!!!!!
Oh my giddy aunt...!!!
Posted on 31-08-2024 14:05 | By phoebe12
"...serious barriers including the environmental impacts.... - really! Was that even considered when the bridge was first built? Don't think so. No, a bridge was needed there so it was built - end of! Nothing will ever get done whilst we have those criteria as a main concern - oh, what am I talking about - nothing has got done! Silly me....go back to the stone age!
Let's get definite! Just do it!
Posted on 31-08-2024 14:37 | By Watchdog
Possible removal of the coastal area and replanting with new pohutukawa could be a good solution on Turret Road for four-laning. Replacing the bridge by building it in two halves so as not to interrupt existing traffic flow would be helpful. More expensive now, perhaps but better and more satisfying in the long run to fourlane the whole of that stretch of road. Don't do a bus lane, this time. But a cycle lane could still fit.
I for one feel sympathy with all this people who have to inch along in a merging two lane nightmare every morning. Get NZTA to fund the lot!
Way too late
Posted on 31-08-2024 22:50 | By Tez
This needed to be done 20 years ago. Back then it took nearly an hour to get from early Papamoa to Bethlehem for work. Was there visiting a month back and it doesn't look like things have got any better.
Late 1970’s to 1980’s
Posted on 01-09-2024 11:26 | By sandzl
Back in the day (pre harbour bridge), Turret Road was the only way to get into the city. It was a very congested road, and the council of the time were planning on widening the road, but I understand that this was stopped by council as some pohutukawa trees would have to be taken out along Turret Road.
While your reporting states that this road/bridge needed to be sorted 20 years ago, I believe it needed to be done 40 years ago. Little has changed except 15th Avenue. Original roading maps had plans for 15th Ave one way, and 16th Ave the other way, although it's 1978 since I sighted those plans. Such a pity this work wasn't completed then.
Half a sandwich
Posted on 01-09-2024 19:00 | By CliftonGuy
Unfortunately, history has shown that decision making by those NZ governmental entities shows that they are too timid in making decent decisions. The bridge over the Waitemata harbour is a pure example. It was going to be 4 lanes each way, then cut back to 2 lanes each way. And then realisation took place and it had to be widened.
Back here, the road needs to be doubled up. Any half-hearted compromise will need to be adjusted at a later date, probably sooner than later.
Just get on with it. Grasp the nettle and widen the connection to four lanes and be done with it!
Stupid does
Posted on 03-09-2024 10:20 | By an_alias
What stupid does, its been an issue of council creating congestion.
Make it four lanes all the way and remove the bottle necks.
STOP putting raised crossing to slow traffic every single non-main road.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.