Pukehina man says council ignored residents' views

Pukehina residents will no longer pay rates towards a sewerage scheme. Photo / John Borren

A Pukehina resident has questioned why the council bothered with community consultation after it rejected the majority’s view to refund more than $500,000 in targeted rates.

In 2000, Western Bay of Plenty District council started collecting a targeted rate of $20 a year from Pukehina properties, a beachside town near Tauranga, for a possible sewerage scheme.

The council paused collecting the rate in 2022 after feedback from the community and uncertainty around the Government’s water reforms.

As part of this year’s 10-year-plan council decided to stop collecting it permanently.

The council asked the community how it would like to spend the $528,053 in the fund and gave the community four options.

Its preferred option was to repurpose the fund for existing projects, which 42% of submitters wanted.

The majority of submitters at 52% wanted the money to be refunded.

Four % wanted the fund to be repurposed for septic tank cleaning and 2% wanted to retain if for a future sewerage scheme.

During long-term plan deliberations the council voted to repurpose the fund for projects due to the potentially high administration cost of rate refunds and the large proportion of people who wanted the money used on other projects.

Pukehina ratepayer Murray Howard asked why the council bothered consulting if they were going to decide against the majority.

Howard’s submission was in support of the refund, but he said his concern with the council’s decision wasn’t “sour grapes”.

Western Bay of Plenty District Council decided not to refund Pukehina residents the rates they had paid for a sewerage scheme that won't be built in the next 10 years. Photo / Alex Cairns
Western Bay of Plenty District Council decided not to refund Pukehina residents the rates they had paid for a sewerage scheme that won't be built in the next 10 years. Photo / Alex Cairns

The council shouldn’t have bothered with consultation if they weren’t going to listen to what most people wanted, he said.

“It’s a waste of money.”

“If you don’t want to go with the majority, why? It’s not a dictatorship.”

Howard said he wanted the council to publicise its decision about the rate because he had to ring the council to find out about it.

A lot of other people in the beachside township weren’t aware of the outcome either, he said.

Council policy and planning manager Matthew Leighton said community engagement was an essential part of decision-making.

“Hearing from as many different voices as possible helps councillors weigh options and make more informed decisions.

Community feedback was one of a range of considerations for council decision making alongside other additional information and considerations, such as technical and legal advice, he said.

“When considering community feedback, it is not just the numbers councillors consider, but the reasons and rationale presented.”

The council has published its 2024-34 long-term plan decision document on its website.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

4 comments

First mistake!

Posted on 08-11-2024 11:38 | By jed

Once council have their hands on your money, they're never giving it back.

The survey was just a box ticking exercise then they do what they want.

Similarly to Tauranga council, they ignore residents views, but are forced to 'consult'.

I talked to council about removal of some carparks at main beach about 5 years ago -- the council employee was surprised to hear my objection because she said they did a community survey and 100% of people were in favour of carpark removal.


The Master

Posted on 08-11-2024 16:21 | By Ian Stevenson

Typical Council, you have a hint of the pre-determined status here when ever it says "preferred option" that means it is already decided...

Second WBOP is broke, even if they did agree to refund the rates, they don't want to as the debt would be higher...

Third, they would have already spent it all anyway.


Ratepayer

Posted on 09-11-2024 09:06 | By FreddyN

Page 208 of the LTP Consultation Document gave an example of what GST inclusive rates would be on a Residential Property with a CV of $1.3 million in 2024-25 after an increase of 9.8%. When informed that a real property with a CV of $1.3 million was already paying more than that before the increase they changed it to GST exclusive.
WBOPDC income from rates is about $100 million so changing from inclusive of GST to exclusive of GST for all rates equates to about a $15 million change in their rates income. All done at the stroke of a pen half-way through the consultation period.
That's how much they care for consultation.


Feels like a dictatorship.

Posted on 09-11-2024 12:41 | By Watchdog

To hold one's head up high, you must right a wrong by undoing what was wrong. To take money and not use it smacks of a rort. It should be easy enough to find out who paid for it set up a computer programme and whiz it to offset the current rates for those properties.
Come on Council. Play Fair please!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.