Protest in Tauranga over pay equity changes

Protesters took to Red Square in Tauranga to oppose the Government's changes to the Equal Pay Act. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

 

Tauranga people furious about the Government’s sudden changes to the Equal Pay Act held a rainy protest in Red Square on Friday.

It was one of a series of Labour- and union-led protests nationwide against the changes, which were announced on Tuesday and passed under urgency in Parliament on Wednesday.

 

The reforms retrospectively overhaul a 2020 law establishing a regime to allow people in sectors with a large female workforce to argue they were underpaid relative to similar work done in male-dominated sectors.

All 33 current claims, representing thousands of workers, will cease. Claimants will need to reapply under the new regime, which will have a higher threshold for success.

It will save the Government billions of dollars in wages, with the savings going into the Budget, to be published on May 22.

Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden said the urgency was to allow all claims to be considered under the same thresholds.

 

In Red Square, Tauranga care and support worker and E Tū union member Tanya Oomen said, “We’ve had enough.”

 

Labour Party list member Jan Tinetti led the protest in Tauranga. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
Labour Party list member Jan Tinetti led the protest in Tauranga. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

She said the Government was “cutting women’s pay without any warning, without consultation”.

“National has forced through a law change that will take money directly out of women’s pockets across New Zealand.”

 

 

She said National was doing it to “make their Budget add up” and was turning its back on the thousands of women who fought for equal pay, “all to fund tax breaks for tobacco companies and landlords”.

Local care and support worker of the E Tū union, Tanya Oomen (left), speaking at Tauranga's protest against the Equal Pay Act changes. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
Local care and support worker of the E Tū union, Tanya Oomen (left), with Labour list MP Jan Tinetti, at Tauranga's protest against the Equal Pay Act changes. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

 

 

Oomen described herself as a care and support worker in the disability sector, working in a house with six adults with intellectual and physical disabilities.

She said she did 24-hour shifts, only half of those hours double-staffed.

She was expected to sleep on-site, care for her charges, cook, clean, take them to activities and appointments, keep them connected to family and friends, and check their finances.

 

 

“I’m more than an arse-wiper. Much more.

“We have been fighting so hard and for so long, and all we want is a decent wage for the hard work that we do.”

 

 

The 33 current pay equity claims will be stopped and will have to be restarted under the new changes. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
The 33 current pay equity claims will be stopped and will have to be restarted under the new changes. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

 

New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) member Conor Fraser said it was “gutting to see how quickly changes can be made to an Equal Pay Act that has been fought for for decades”.

Fraser said he was part of a pay equity settlement last March.

NZEI member Conor Fraser speaking at the Tauranga protest against the changes made to the Equal Pay Act. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
NZEI member Conor Fraser speaking at the Tauranga protest against the changes made to the Equal Pay Act. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

 

“I’ve been part of a team that went through the process of understanding what the legislation is and how you enforce it and how you correct inequities that have existed for a long period of time.

“For others to not have that opportunity, it’s wild.”

Mount Maunganui Labour Party member Heidi Tidmarsh organised the protest, led by Labour Party list MP Jan Tinetti.

Mount Maunganui Labour Party member Heidi Tidmarsh. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
Mount Maunganui Labour Party member Heidi Tidmarsh. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

NZEI staff member Kirsty McCully said the change had added barriers to women being able to achieve pay justice.

“It takes us back to before 1972 when the Equal Pay Act was first brought into force.

“I think what it really does is negates a whole lot of amazing work [by] campaigners like Kristine Bartlett.

 

Participants at Tauranga's
Participants at Tauranga's "Stand Up Fight Back" protest for pay equity after the coalition Government's announcement of the changes to the Equal Pay legislation on May 6. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

McCully works with early childhood teachers and as a result of this change, 93,000 teachers have had their pay equity claim set back.

“It’s devastating, and it really is a kick in the guts.

“It makes the idea that we can achieve wage justice almost impossible.”

McCully said many women were already struggling in the cost-of-living crisis and trying to hold their families together.

She said the Government was saying $3 billion a year for landlords was affordable but $1.7b in wage justice for women is not.

“The Government’s making decisions that impact on a small number of the wealthy to privilege their interests over the interests of the vast workers who have had wage injustice for generations, and now that’s going to be entrenched.”

Men and women of Tauranga gathered today to protest against the changes made to the Equal Pay Act by the coalition Government. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
Men and women of Tauranga gathered today to protest against the changes made to the Equal Pay Act by the Coalition Government. Photo / Ayla Yeoman

On a visit to Tauranga today, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said his Government is “very, very committed to pay equity, and avoiding and eliminating sex-based discrimination”.

“But we also need to make sure we have one system that is robust, that’s workable, that’s sustainable and actually focused on the core purpose of the legislation, that is about eliminating sex-based discrimination, rather than bringing in broader labour market conditions you often see in a bargaining round.”

Luxon said individuals and unions could still apply to have pay equity claims processed and the Government had put money aside to deal with these in future.

 

 

He said the changes aimed to encourage more specific pay-equity claims.

“We’ve seen claims that have up to 90 different occupations, when we see comparisons between fisheries officers and librarians.

“What we need to have is a hierarchy of comparators to make sure the system is more workable and gives people more certainty.”

He described the Opposition framing of the review as “a little bit disingenuous” and said saving money was not the primary reason for the change.

 

9 comments

There would be no end....

Posted on 10-05-2025 10:19 | By groutby

...to the far fetched claims from Unions under pay Equity rules if the rules were not 'reigned in'....pay 'Equity' itself is hardly workable when jobs such as librarians considered alongside fisheries officers, or clerical staff to mechanical engineers, or how about social workers to air traffic controllers?...madness..we all want 'more' and the previous administration have once again promised everything to everyone at any cost...it can't be done.
Now, many are (rightfully so) annoyed the current government for putting the brakes on and also has turned it into a gender issue....very cunning for their own political end but not at all positive otherwise.
However, I do have sympathy for those claimants who had commenced negotiations, but once again, expectations were raised to unreasonable levels with no money in the pot to pay for it....


The Master

Posted on 10-05-2025 13:56 | By Ian Stevenson

There is clearly massive confusion here...

- Pay "equity"
- Same pay as everyone else...

Are not the same thing and are 100% completely unrealistic.

Why would a qualified pre-school care provider get the same wages as an experienced engineer? The qualifications, responsibilities and so on are vastly different and cant be compared.

I am all for: -
1 Pay equity where the same job, same hours, same experience, same abilities and same outcomes are paid equally.
2 A job "label" alone or a alleged 8-hour day at work does not automatically mean same pay.

See part 2


The Master

Posted on 10-05-2025 13:59 | By Ian Stevenson

Part 2

It's clear that genuine people go to work for more than just the money, it is also clear that money does not ensure that there is an uptake in numbers employed or that abilities and results will improve.

Example:-Teachers have had significant pay increases over the last decade or so, obvious questions result: -
1 Have the student results improved? NO
2 Has the OCED ranking of NZ improved? NO
3 Is there any connection between pay and results? NO

Based on the above, logically, obviously, all outcomes are worse so why have wages gone up? This is merely rewarding failure, is that a good idea? NO

With more pay comes more responsibility... this must be so.


Apples and oranges

Posted on 11-05-2025 12:08 | By morepork

It is crazy to introduce job comparison on gender across different work sectors. How can you compare Librarians, Teachers, mechanical engineers or ANY sector against ANY OTHER, completely different, sector?
The ONLY thing that MUST be inviolate when it comes to job equality, is that ANYONE doing that job (irrespective of gender or any other prejudicial factor), gets paid exactly the same as anyone else doing it.


Mixed Comparisons

Posted on 12-05-2025 22:07 | By k Smith

Agree with more pork, some of the comments are way out of line. There are a number of male and female people doing the same jobs but most of the females get paid less. EG Truck drivers, delivery couriers, Doctors, medical staff. Job comparison.
Cost of living is out of control wages are and have been stagnant for a number of years now.
After WW2 the family household were living off one wage income. (larger families) In the last 20-30 years this has been impossible.
This National government has taken the rights away from many people and this action is very undemocratic. All the working females will now vote for other parties at the next election.


@ k Smith

Posted on 13-05-2025 23:50 | By groutby


.....The comment from writer morepork is correct, the comparisons between jobs are insane and due to become moreso with each further claim.
After that further comments could not be further from the truth....those in government reviewing these claims are not suggesting that women are or should be paid less for doing exactly the same job for the same employer is being paid less...that...is illegal...and indeed wages rose substantially over recent years under the Labour government during the covid regime, mainly for their own government employees and therefore putting undue pressure on private industry to match those rises, often not achievable and closing many workplaces. It is not correct that it 'affects all working females', as claims would have impact on all workers irrespective of gender....these claims can still be lodged under more rational guidelines...the same rights still exist...Union mistruths...again...


@ Groutby

Posted on 14-05-2025 09:00 | By k Smith

You misread my opinion; I already agreed with morepork: My comments were of two things, I am 40 + years various engineering industry and have first hand experience of pay equity. Although a lot of the pay equity has come closer in the last few years. You mentioned unions well a lot of workers are not members of unions. As far as wage increases again fist hand experience and I know hundreds of people in the work force and family etc, very little or no pay increase in the last 5 years. The filing of the 2020 pay equity laws. The pay increases have not kept pace with inflation: record numbers of people falling behind in mortgages , more people relaying on food banks etc. Research the economy. I have a friend retired now who is a highly qualified economist we talked about this in the last few years.


I think we are often mistaken........

Posted on 15-05-2025 22:11 | By groutby

.......of the meaning and difference between pay 'equity' and pay 'equality'....

Pay equality is simply being rewarded similarly for the work done in a particular job/industry irrespective of gender, male or female...any different is seen to be illegal and should be addressed as such....

Pay equity however refers to equal pay for work of equal value, meaning that individuals should be paid the same regardless of gender or other similarities however remote, if their work requires 'similar' skills, so unions are working very hard since the inception of the 'Pay Equity Law", by the Labour government in 2020, to compare 'apples with oranges' (who are of course being paid more) to increase the wages of those in totally unrelated industries which is unrealistically going to cost taxpayers and companies a crazy amount of money leading to closures, unemployment and nutty claims...insanity...


The 2020 Filing

Posted on 17-05-2025 08:55 | By k Smith

This was to go before a judicial hearing etc to sort this out. The National government has put a stop to this. Is this Democracy? This hearing should go ahead to find out the issues and resolve them in some way. We know about the similarities between jobs skills, etc between genders should be equal pay but is this happening fairly? What evidence is there? They need this hearings.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.