Council confirms board payments

Merging the city's Council Controlled Organisations is going to cost ratepayers $225,000, plus an increased ongoing annual amount in director's fees.

The fees and salaries of the directors of the merged Tauranga trading organisations were revealed at yesterday's council meeting.


Tauranga City Council has announced the pay rates for the directors of the newly merged CCOs including Baypark.

The new leisure company created by merging Tauranga City Aquatics Ltd and Tauranga City Venues Ltd is expected to result in $1.8 million savings for the ratepayers within three years, says chief executive officer Leigh Auton.

The merged leisure company will have $150 million in ratepayers' assets including TECT Arena, Baypark and the city pools network.

It will have more than 200 staff and a combined turnover of more than $23 million, but $14 million of the income is from rates contributions for public good services and $9million from user fees.

The set up cost of $225,000 is to cover expected merger costs, $20,000 in legal advice, $10,000 tax advice, $100,000 for redundancies, with $15,000 for ‘other' expenses.

Business services group manager Dean Riley believes there's a possibility that fewer than five people may be made redundant from the merger of the two CCOs.

Council also decided directors of the city's merged Tauranga City Aquatics Ltd and Tauranga City Venues Ltd are to be paid between $28,000 and $32,000 a year with the chairman being paid up to $60,000.

The total amount currently paid to CCO directors is $76,000, which is low because city councillors David Stewart, Wayne Moultrie and Larry Baldock are TCAL directors who take no fees.

Councillors agreed to the increase in director's fees saying they want a more fiscally literate directorate to manage the leisure company on a properly commercial basis, and the fees are set at a market rate.

When councillor Larry Baldock, seconded by Wayne Moultrie, moved the council pay an additional $10,000 to the existing CCO chairpersons, it failed for lack of support. Fellow TCAL director David Stewart agreed with the sentiment but says it's better paid at the end of March.

Larry says TCAL chairman Shirley Baker's work is outstanding, and she deserves the payment when the extra hours she's worked at the current hourly rate are considered.

When councillors talked about paying the directors of the new company what they were worth, Larry said the words are hollow because of the vote against paying Shirley.

20 comments

Hike in Directors fees

Posted on 19-12-2012 17:40 | By PLONKER

To make them "commercially" real but no one of them is the least bit responsible for "ANY" decision that is made. That is not commercially realistic at all.


Sunlive forgot or didn't pick up on ...

Posted on 19-12-2012 18:43 | By Murray.Guy

Sunlive forgot or didn't pick up on ... we were also advised that in all likelihood the new entity will require a significant cash injection from ratepayers (in addition to the $5 million already agreed to for TCVL) to better ensure it is financially sound! Also not included in the report from staff was the FACT that the 300% increase in meetings fees will have a flow-on effect to all other external CCO's and Tangata Whenua representation. I think I recall correctly when I quote CEO Leigh Auton saying, "$1200 a day was the going rate!" NOT when it's my town, my ratepayers doing the paying, voting against the payments. Roll on the Oct 2013 election when we can hopefully 'claim our city back' and put a block on our credit cards!


ENOUGH

Posted on 19-12-2012 21:25 | By Colleen Spiro

Isn't Council supposed to be running our city.....NOT involved in spending rate payers money on Commercial Ventures for their mates.


Spending like its 1999....

Posted on 20-12-2012 07:55 | By wreck1080

Maybe the council thinks the world is going to end tomorrow so going on a spend up?


Did Murray Guy also forget?

Posted on 20-12-2012 08:27 | By Phailed

Didn't Cr Guy support the purchase of a Speedway business? And also the $5 million Baypark / TCVL loan? What a surprise that the whole thing is now going to cost us ratepayers even more. Just what do Cr Guy and his councillors pay Mr Auton to be their interim CEO? That figure may also horrify us? Citizens Monitoring Councillor Consistency.


@ MURRAY

Posted on 20-12-2012 10:56 | By YOGI

The $5 million and the other spare $20-30 million already thrown in the hole at TCVL this year alone was never to make it 'financially sound' it is to 'shore it up' becasue it is making massive loses. someone has to front for that cash leakage. More directors fee paid for a 'good job' done is not showing up anywhere soon for ratepayers now is it. Wonder how many more millions will go into this next year? the year after? the year after that ....


@ MURRAY

Posted on 20-12-2012 11:36 | By YOGI

Can only agree that this is all unbelievable stuff and not one of them has anything useful to show for the tenure while keeping a seat warm.


Looking Good - NOT!

Posted on 20-12-2012 15:26 | By Dollie

Does that mean the city councillors David Stewart, Wayne Moultrie and Larry Baldock are Directors of the new Leisure Company? Are there not other worthy people in the community that can do the job? It seems in-house decisions are going on with ratepayers money being shared amongst themselves. Yuk! Stink! What else do they do on Council? Looks like they are there to get what they can. And being pious about the woman not getting $60,000 makes them look bad.


@ Phailed

Posted on 20-12-2012 17:18 | By TERMITE

Yes Murray did vote to buy it, but you would have to agree that the whole process was a setup by the ring leaders of it and the Councilors had no escape from the trap set, in fact they more or less threw themselves at it at the end of the day.


RAILROADED

Posted on 22-12-2012 09:17 | By PLONKER

Nothing less, can't see how TCC are going to avoid shelling out millions every year on this, like already it is $14 million a year just to pay the bills.


rail roaded ratepayers

Posted on 29-12-2012 14:10 | By Crash test dummies

It is the silly season for many things and this would lead the pack on crazy. I went for a casual wander about to see where the $150 million of assets is, as expected they are not there, there is a bit of bricks and mortar around but adding it lal up no one is ever going to get even close to $150 million for it on a good day in heaven ... what there is a $150m of is BS and FITH syndrome to even put all of this on the table at a Council meeting and pretend that someone is going to believe any of it, but well then it looks like they are swallowing it, pummeled by years of staff education of Councilors to believe whatever is on paper in front of them. Life is bliss and the story telling lives on as strong as ever.


Savings What a Laugh

Posted on 29-12-2012 15:58 | By Jitter

This is the savings you get when you are not making a saving. This is absolutely disgusting. I understood that the aim of the amalgamation was to cut staff numbers considerably, restructure and so save considerable expense. Councillors have been fooled again by consultants and TCC staff advisers not reporting fully the overall effect of the merger. What a bloody con. I suppose all the existing CEOs will be retaining their positions ? There should be one CEO position which should be advertised publicly and a General Managers position for each of the now merged entities also advertised publicly. No wonder TCC is in so much debt when this is how they go about saving expenditure. TCC just blythly dump the extra cost on the ratepayers with no thought as to whether they can afford it. Then Murray Guy states that the increase in fees will have a flow on effect to all other CCOs and Tangata Whenua. This is shocking. Why are Tangata Whenua even represented ? Absolutely unbelievable.


$150 million of assets?

Posted on 30-12-2012 20:42 | By Crash test dummies

Can someone tell me where they are? Went for a wander a couple a days ago to find the $150 million but I am afraid I came up well short. What I did find was these: A muddy dirty track, next door was a bit of a shed with a nice paint job, a couple of buildings with pools: Baywave(no waves), Mount Hot Pools(actually cold) Greerton puddle, Memorial pool(not that memorable at all). Did I miss something in that list? At best there would be about $25-30 million worth of lands, some of the improvements may have some value but not $115-120 million. This looks really bad?


SAVINGS

Posted on 02-01-2013 15:18 | By YOGI

Not likely, these can not happen as the general results of TCC show that as they make things bigger means that it costs a lot more, call in the "mushroom affect", in every sense of the word!


THE OPPOSITE OF SAVINGS IS

Posted on 03-01-2013 11:24 | By YOGI

The flow on effect of these two Companies merging means the prymaid of staff will be more lofty so all in the pile here will seek more and better salaries. So not only will there be no staff reductions but instead the salary bill will be more, a lot more.


THE LARRY AND SHIREY SHOW

Posted on 04-01-2013 11:58 | By YOGI

So larry wants to pay more money to Shirley? and is VERY dissappointed that all the other Councilors did not see ti his way. Really interesting that he is "SO DISAPPOINTMENTED" and that everything is so "HOLLOW"?


LARRY AND SHIRLEY

Posted on 04-01-2013 20:27 | By PLONKER

I give to you, you give to me .... not sure I like the conatations of all of this folks. Not a good use of ratepayers money to make ever bigger payouts without result.


JUST PAY MORE MONEY

Posted on 06-01-2013 11:45 | By PLONKER

Still no results from it, like where is the sense in that? Surely some sort of plan or expectation would be agreed to first so that results are related to what is paid, that is what happens in the real world but I guess here it is official womble land where anything goes especially ratepayers hard earned money without reason.


PAY MORE FOR LESS

Posted on 16-01-2013 00:36 | By PLONKER

This is not any different to anything TCC does, pay more money get less results for it.


GREAT IDEA

Posted on 17-01-2013 11:32 | By TERMITE

Pay more money. Of course that will only work if the right people are placed in the hot seat at the new company and that they are capable to make a change. The CCO's are never going to make a $1 even though much else has been promised over the eyars, but the insentive here is to ensure that the annual losses are minimised and so the cost to ratepayers is kept in check here and it is certainly not at the moment.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.