Tauranga rates rise shaved down to 9.9%

Tauranga City Council during Annual Plan deliberations this week. Photo / David Hall

Tauranga residents are facing a 9.9% rates rise after the council found extra savings.

Tauranga City Council faced public criticism for proposing a 12% rates increase, down from a projected 20%.

It has found $9.85 million more in cuts to council operating costs to knock off another just over 2%.

These included saving $166,000 by turning public recycling bins - which had high contamination rates - into rubbish bins.

The biggest cost drop, however, came from employee reductions, with at least 98 roles cut and at $12.3m saved.

The council deliberated on its 2025/26 Annual Plan from Monday to Thursday after receiving 968 submissions and hearing from 68 people in person this month.

On Thursday Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the changes and savings made in the plan would flow through to future years.

Drysdale promised he would keep the rates below those forecast in the long-term plan.

The 9.9% overall rates rise was “not as good” as the councillors would have liked, but it was a start, he said.

The council would be looking at every dollar because they needed to be prudent with people’s money, Drysdale said.

“We have to respect ratepayers’ money, and we have to deliver things for as small a cost as we can.”

Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo / David Hall
Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo / David Hall

The community had also told the council more facilities were needed, he said.

“We’ve been dealt a very tough situation where our infrastructure and our community assets are well below where they need to be.”

He said the challenge was finding the balance between delivering projects and reducing rates.

“I’m very proud of this team [and] I think we have delivered a very good balance.”

Councillor Glen Crowther said it was a challenging Annual Plan because they were dealing with past decisions that added costs to the organisation.

A lot of those decisions were “firmly locked into place”, he said.

Ōtūmoetai ward councillor Glen Crowther. Photo / David Hall
Ōtūmoetai ward councillor Glen Crowther. Photo / David Hall

Crowther said he wanted a lower rates increase.

“I appreciate that a lot of work went into getting to the 9.9%, so I’m not dismissing that, but I think we need to end up lower.”

The council’s operating expenses were still too high, and he wanted work done before the Annual Plan was adopted in July to reduce rates further, he said.

During the four days of deliberations, the council discussed everything from portaloos to tsunami paths in Pāpāmoa.

Tauranga Netball asked for $20,000 to lease five portaloos toilets at Blake Park during the winter sports season.

Drysdale said this was “expensive” and they needed to “get a deal”.

The council decided to buy the portaloos and would be able to pay for this within the current budget.

The council will spend $5.71 million upgrading the Ōtūmoetai Pool. Photo / NZME
The council will spend $5.71 million upgrading the Ōtūmoetai Pool. Photo / NZME

The Ōtūmoetai Pool, an “amazing community asset” slated for closure, was saved.

The council also agreed to extend the Pāpāmoa shared coastal path from Parton Rd to Taylor Reserve, provided it cost no more than $1m and could be delivered within the council’s current budget.

There were some losers from the deliberations.

Councillors declined ARGOS Gym Sports $67,000 for a new kitchen and cafe facility, and Bowls Matua would not receive $180,000 to upgrade its third green.

Creative Bay of Plenty would also not receive a $77,500 increase in its funding.

The rates increase would be finalised in June when the Annual Plan was adopted.

How the council achieved its savings

  • Projects reprioritised or delivered in-house – $3.2m
  • Reduction in consultants and more use of internal services – $3.9m
  • Employee cost reductions – $9.1m
  • Uptake-related kerbside collection cost reduction – $900,000
  • Interest-related finance cost savings – $2m
  • Increased user fees – $2.3m
  • Reduced engagement and education costs – $1.5m
  • Other organisation-wide cost reductions – $5.1m

The extra savings to get to 9.9%

  • Further employee cost reductions – $3.2m
  • Interest and depreciation savings – $2.2m
  • Process improvement savings – $3.8m

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

14 comments

Cr Crowther

Posted on 30-05-2025 21:58 | By Kauritatahi

He seems to be doing a very good job, and what he was elected to do. Would be good if a few of the other councillors followed his example more, and helped to really reduce waste and all the unnecessary extras in the bloated council empire.


Hmmm

Posted on 31-05-2025 08:11 | By Let's get real

Just look at that picture and tell me that the council has invested in a quality outcome.
Looks like they're holding a meeting in a woodshed.


Savings

Posted on 31-05-2025 09:08 | By Duegatti

I fail to see why our rates are funding sports infrastructure.
I don't mean playing fields, but the facilities on them.
I'd venture that a majority of ratepayers never, or hardly ever use them.
What happened to user pays?
Then there's the 98 people who will be out of a job. If they weren't needed, why were they hired?
The reduced rates rise is good, but it could have been done differently and better.



How about

Posted on 31-05-2025 09:10 | By an_alias

You do a graph showing the rate increases over the last 20 years LDR ?
That will show clearly the council is out of control.
Did I get a 10%-15% increase in my pay for the last 5 years ?
I'm telling you clearly business fails when you put rates up like this in a time when we are clearly in a recession which was set in place by the covid fiasco.


Good start

Posted on 31-05-2025 09:19 | By The Sage

Funny what a protest march and a lot of adverse media attention can help achieve. Finally they start to listen. Good achievement however don’t rest on your laurels. This still needs to come down further.


It is good to...

Posted on 31-05-2025 12:10 | By morepork

... see words backed by actions. The important thing is to demonstate that the culture and attitude is very much aware of responsibility for other people's money. This is a move in the right direction and it is good to be able to post here without slamming them. Maybe there's hope for us yet.
Some of the requests for funds that were declined could probably approach other sources (like TECT) and it is always bad to see people lose their jobs, but when it is necessary, it has to be done.
Overall, this is a positive outcome and I hope they continue in ths vein.


Token Gesture!

Posted on 31-05-2025 12:17 | By R99

A 'Token Gesture' if ever I read one. And the Mayor and Councillors/ Council staff will 'poo-poo' this comment as ungrateful ratepayers? If you are one of these and agree, then re-read the Mayors reaction: “We have to respect ratepayers’ money, and we have to deliver things for as small a cost as we can.”
Now IF only the Mayor can live up to his name...Mahe. Is it a case of 'Mahe by name, not by action (Mahe)?'
The Urban Task Force will not be pleased to read such 'rebel talk' from "their" installation!
Bring on the Rates 'Cap'. Oh hail, the Coalition Govt!


The Master

Posted on 31-05-2025 12:20 | By Ian Stevenson

Above it says "Drysdale promised he would keep the rates below those forecast in the long-term plan."

He obviously is cracking a funny here, the 2024-2034 LTP has 167% rate increased "planned" for already, over 10 years that's a 16.7% average.

Most cost "savings" noted above are rather wishy-washy type things, it is 99% likely that was intentionally held back on purpose to try to show a response to the 100% predictable public reaction.

What is really need, firstly, is a rate cap and a debt reduction plan.


TWE

Posted on 31-05-2025 15:59 | By CliftonGuy

A whole lot more could be carved off if the Tauranga White Elephant (TWE) otherwise known as the Civic Development, removed the Museum and Conference Centre from the agenda. A total of about $120 million. These could easily be added later when there is more money in the kitty.


@cliftonguy

Posted on 01-06-2025 12:07 | By Kancho

Yep if they had taken any notice of ratepayers and the referendum we wouldn't be in this position of continuous double digit increases stretching into kids and grandkids rates. Or at least a much less ambitious plan set up by people who aren't paying for it but have taken the money and ran . Thanks Auntie Mahuta


I agree…

Posted on 01-06-2025 12:20 | By Shadow1

…Clifton guy, it’s a pretty pathetic attempt at reducing a rates increase. Deferring some of the major projects could reduce the increase to 5% possibly. Still not enough but reassessing staff numbers year on year could do the trick.
More attention to the quality of new staff is important too, it must be obvious by now that offering the highest salaries doesn’t necessarily mean you get the best applicants.
Shadow1.


More needed

Posted on 01-06-2025 15:23 | By BJWD

The Council should be managed with the same efficiency and accountability as a major corporation. Over the years, it has become excessively bloated. Any effective leader understands that the first step toward sustainable governance is cost reduction—starting with the elimination of internal inefficiencies such as redundant staff, excessive perks, and personal use of council vehicles. Strong leadership ensures these matters are addressed promptly to maintain organizational efficiency. If these issues persist, it is a clear indication that leadership is failing in its responsibilities.


I agree Shadow1..but...

Posted on 01-06-2025 18:56 | By groutby

..to actually believe in the first instance that '98 roles' are to be cut and more to follow is, at least at the moment, something in which I doubt will happen.
What level of salary are such futuristic appointments being made and at what cost to the ratepayer?
Such roles will (by and large) be unfilled and/or futuristic appointments which will eventually happen, if not this year then next, the 'empire building' stuff...rather than expect what the private sector expects are personally and financially accountable for every day..
"Smoke in mirrors' is what I expect...call it 'gaslighting' if you wish...
If however I am completely wrong, please have the guts to say, we all have the ability to change our point of view...


Spending

Posted on 05-06-2025 16:32 | By k Smith

I heard today there was a mural painting commissioned for a CBD car park at around $100,00. If this is true here we are with more dumb spending. Cut out this B/S.
If anyone can shed some light on this please post.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.