A major Tauranga road project is set to go ahead without NZ Transport Agency funding, but there will be compromises.
Cameron Rd Stage 2 involved fully or partially four-laning the southern end of the central arterial route, between 17th Ave and Maleme St.
Water infrastructure under the road would also be upgraded, with ratepayers set to pay more than $100 million of the total costs.
The project follows the controversial $110m Cameron Rd Stage 1, which focused on the north end and finished in early 2024.
Tauranga City Council planned to co-fund Stage 2 with NZ Transport Agency (NZTA), but the project was not prioritised in the current National Land Transport programme.
Councillors were presented with a revised “value for money” option at meeting on Tuesday.
The original designs for the transport infrastructure were costed at $164 million, but the redesign was estimated to cost $98.8m.
This could be funded through a $56.4m grant from the Government’s Infrastructure Acceleration Fund (IAF), $22.4m in developer contributions and $20m from an Infrastructure Funding and Financing Levy that would be paid back by ratepayers through a targeted rate.
The $86.7m water infrastructure required is funded through the current long-term plan.
This means ratepayers would foot at least $106.7m of the total project bill – and the IAF grant was also not guaranteed.
The IAF was being reviewed, so there was a risk this funding source could be lost.
However, the fund administrator said if the council committed to delivering the project by June 30, 2030, it could increase the chance of keeping the funding.

Options proposed for Cameron Rd at Greerton Village could feature either two or four lanes of traffic, and traffic signals or roundabouts at the Chadwick Rd and Cornwall St intersections. Photo / Mead Norton
Council senior project manager Richard O’Kane said the proposed designs came with compromises and trade-offs.
A key challenge was enabling right turns along the route, he said.
Another was beautification of the berms and urban revitalisation, O’Kane said.
The original design included new footpaths with pavers, signage and beautification similar to Cameron Rd Stage 1, but the new design focused on transport outcomes, he said.
Three concept design options have been created for Greerton Village.
Option 1 would be four lanes along the full route with dual signalised intersections in Greerton Village, with an estimated cost of $95.4m.
Option 2 was two lanes through the village with separated cycle lanes, costing an estimated $88m.
Option 3 would be four lanes along the whole route with dual roundabouts in Greerton Village at an estimated cost of $90.8m.

The Cameron Rd Stage 1 project added separated cycleways to the street. Photo / Ayla Yeoman
The four-lane options futureproofed the corridor with options for dedicated bus or transit lanes that could become parking outside peak traffic times, O’Kane’s report said.
The existing corridor had about 338 on-street car parks. Initial assessments showed 300 could be retained this way.
Modelling showed four lanes was the preferable outcome, he said.
The options would be presented to the community for feedback, which would be incorporated into further designs.
O’Kane said the project was important to enable housing intensification in the Te Papa peninsula, which was critical to the city’s growth outcomes.
The IAF funding agreement was based on building infrastructure faster to enable at least 1600 extra dwellings in the Te Papa area over 10 years, the report said.

Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo / David Hall
Mayor Mahé Drysdale said it was a “suboptimal solution” but it would deliver something now.
Otherwise, the council would be talking about this in 10 years’ time and the project could cost $300m, he said.
“If we want to deliver a project, this is our best opportunity to deliver it.”
It would not include all the “nice-to-haves” from the original project but it would still have the same outcomes, Drysdale said.
“We can deliver a project that achieves 100% of the outcomes of the original project for approximately half the cost.”

Ōtūmoetai ward councillor Glen Crowther. Photo / David Hall
Councillor Glen Crowther supported the project but said it was a “very tight timeframe” for completion.
He wanted to make sure the council did not create undue risks and costs that were not factored into the project.
There were “big learnings” from Stage 1, where the known risks were not taken into account early enough, Crowther said.
That project suffered delays and budget overruns, and caused significant disruption, particularly to Cameron Rd businesses.
Crowther said the council needed to make sure the public had a genuine say on key issues about the project.
The council unanimously decided to commit to delivering the project.
Concept designs would go out for public feedback before the end of the year once the council had confirmation the IAF funding was still available.
A report would come back to the City Future Committee in 2026 to confirm the design before detailed design planning took place.
- LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.




28 comments
Will it be lead by the
Posted on 27-08-2025 17:22 | By FRANKS
same Council staff who stuffed up the first phase???
Money Tree
Posted on 27-08-2025 17:30 | By BJWD
Stop spending money that we don't have!
Do you think the rate payers are an endless money tree?
You what?
Posted on 27-08-2025 18:06 | By gottabekidding
Wish I could magic 100 mil from somewhere!
If this goes ahead the council needs to be sacked
The Vision
Posted on 27-08-2025 18:24 | By Cynical Me
Be rather nice to see some detailed drawings. Be nice to have a discussion with the council about the design. More brains and users out here than in the flash office.
The last time they completely ignored everything that was suggested, resulting in the current balls up we have with crossings in the wrong place and traffic lights that confuse people because they were never properly thought out.
Oh, and never mind the garbage about all the accidents that have occurred at the intersection. Total lies as the locals will atest. We've listened to all that bullcrap before.
And the design of stage one ain't that flash.
The dead horse
Posted on 27-08-2025 19:33 | By Duegatti
Leave it alone. Stop flogging a stupid idea. The first stage has been a disaster, why compound it ?
Stop wasting our money.
No one cycles, few people catch buses, call it quits and move on .
HOW ABOUT
Posted on 27-08-2025 20:04 | By The Caveman
Returning Cameron Road from Elizabeth Street to 17th Avenue to TWO lanes each way as is was from the mid 1960's until the Council STUFFED is up with bus & bike lanes over the past 5 years!!!
From What I've Heard
Posted on 27-08-2025 21:30 | By Yadick
ALL the parking from outside the hospital goes - disappears.
CHAOS, CHAOS, CHAOS, COUNCIL.
Come on Sam - here's your golden egg. Seize it and deal to it because nobody, absolutely nobody from TCC are listening or gives a rats bottom.
Road
Posted on 28-08-2025 06:14 | By Mallyg
More money yes they think all rate payers are money trees that Levy is on top of our rates which they will put up again next year by who knows 10 to 20 percent 🥵
Definition of insanity
Posted on 28-08-2025 07:58 | By an_alias
We are in a cost of living crisis that council seems unaware of !
How about you come out of your towers and smell the air.
This is NOT needed and is NOT worth the money.
It is true....
Posted on 28-08-2025 08:00 | By groutby
....that it will not be any more 'cost effective' than if you were to lock in the cost of a project today (better still yesterday)...maybe it would be wise to wait until the predicted changes in council occur after local elections, so the incumbent councillors can be responsible for any changes, in this case the stated Cameron Road project.
A skeptic may suspect it is being pushed along as the current team have 'their' plans already locked in.....and any input from the ratepayer essentially ignored....surely that wouldn't be the case...would it?
More unused cycleways anyone?
Comprehensive plan
Posted on 28-08-2025 08:04 | By gincat
Has council a comprehensive plan for Tauranga?
Stage 2 talks about reworking Greerton's roads. Surely Greerton's upgrade would have already been incorporated in the master plan?
Similar to the re work to incorporate the bus centre Durham st. Ripped up new curbing etc which had only been laid recently.
Stop wasting money, do it once, do it right!
Criminal!
Posted on 28-08-2025 08:51 | By Equality
It would be criminal to even consider adding another 'ballsup' to Cameron Road - and then expect the long suffering ratepayers to pay for such out and out stupidity!!
!!!
Posted on 28-08-2025 09:02 | By Poe's Lawyer
EVERYTHING THAT ISN'T DRIVING A CAR IS WOKE! We want to be like America! A beautiful concrete wasteland, with less space for people to walk/bike and MORE LANES FOR CARS! The people of Tauranga demand MORE traffic! I personally don't use the bus, therefore NO ONE should be allowed to use the bus, GET THEM GONE! If you can't afford a car, that's YOUR PROBLEM, why should my rates pay for you to get to the places you need to go?!
Cameron Road Stage 2
Posted on 28-08-2025 09:13 | By Paddyo
Understand the need to upgrade the water infrastructure, do not understand berm beautification, wider footpaths or additional cycleways. Look after the majority who drive please. Keep the traffic moving and focus on necessary changes only please and get this done quickly. 2nd change for Greeton in under 10 years what a waste of money round 1 was,
Affordabilty
Posted on 28-08-2025 10:10 | By Kancho
So the NZTA can't afford it but poor old ratepayers can.we already are paying heavily for the last lot of debt and TCC say we need more ? Leave it alone we have far to much going on . Are we to suffer two years of works and business closures ?
If NZTA ….
Posted on 28-08-2025 13:02 | By Shadow1
… won’t subsidise the project, defer it until they will. And if IAF won’t fund it with a $56M grant, toss the project out! Ratepayers certainly won’t be interested in a $20M contribution paid by a targeted levy either. These bloody levies are just another way of increasing rates so leave them out.
Just because a project is on the long term plan, doesn’t mean it can’t be removed. If that means we can’t build another 1600 houses in the Te Papa peninsula well that’s too bad. Why should existing ratepayers fund new water and wastewater systems for houses that may never be built. Incidentally that’s $50000 just for water for each of 1600 homes.
Shadow1
The Master
Posted on 28-08-2025 13:04 | By Ian Stevenson
Yes, the comments above mostly look to be all correct.
TCC abilities, capability and more is very well understood... Stage 1 was a complete dister and so will stage 2 or anything else remotely like it...
The key factor for a disaster is TCC, any thinkin g, planning or whatever else assures that there will be these factors that are always present...
1 No one but TCC want it, so TCC will do it anyway
2 Whatever TCC says, promises etc will be, at best, a complete 100% dream
3 As always, all TCC do will be a costly, a disaster, a mess and some for any and all related. This especially relates to the businesses along the road.
PS: for the record, the above is the most over stated, positive "spin" one could musterd about TCC and its achievemen
Let's see the plans
Posted on 28-08-2025 13:38 | By Avman
The wording seems to indicate that the scheme is not at all what they claim it is. Alarm bells start ringing when they say it will be "future-proofed" by turning the outside lanes into clearways (bus lanes at peak times and parking at other times). What that means is that there are not really 4-lanes but only 2-lanes for general traffic! Worse still, they say that right-turns are a problem. This suggests that they have not allowed room for the existing turn bays to remain, meaning that right-turners will either be banned, or will block the one remaining through lane in each direction. By the sounds of the wording, far from "4-lanes" this may end up as no through lanes for general traffic at all. We need to see the plans, this smells of very false advertising..
Stop this nonsense!
Posted on 28-08-2025 14:03 | By DJBP
Who would want to pay exorbitant costs for another lengthy, disruptive construction that hampers businesses and road users? The initial phase was unsuccessful, with bus stops blocking cycle lanes, causing congestion behind them and clashing with vehicles leaving driveways and side streets. Additionally, the bike lanes are ineffective since cyclists opt for other roads without dedicated lanes, and the new bus lanes are mostly unused. No one wants twenty more traffic lights on Cameron Rd or the loss of all street parking. Where will hospital staff park? The current road layout pushes drivers to take alternative routes to avoid the three sets of lights per block. Please, give us a break.
good news but ....
Posted on 28-08-2025 14:25 | By Wendy L
I think that because we have a culture of getting things done "too late", like the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff ... doing big roading changes like this absolutely need to include accommodations made to minimise the disruption of traffic.
I remember seeing somewhere overseas, where if they want to work on a main route, they actually build a temporary bridge structure overhead to take all the traffic while the road works go on underneath it. Gotta be safer for everyone as well. Would only need an exit every so often and people would much rather drive an extra block than sit in hold ups for 30 mins to 1 hr surely.
Another mess coming up
Posted on 28-08-2025 19:28 | By tia
Surely the same roading professions can't be promoting another mess? Just have a look at the past Greerton upgrade. 1) They move the pedestrian crossing closer to the Chadwick Rd round-about which caused a bottle neck when people are crossing. 2) They close off the right turn when exiting the road by Caltex. 3) They put in traffic lights about every 150m by Boys College. All in the Promotion of 'safety'. What a joke and they are posing as traffic/roading engineers. Councilors are easily fooled.
Once again
Posted on 29-08-2025 09:21 | By Watchdog
Ratepayers are picking up this expensive tab. Cameron road will be 4 laned and streets will lose their parks to beautification sections along the sides of the road. Where will we sll park i wonder.
Of concern is the section past the hospital where ambulances always need prompt access. This could be critical so council needs ti ensure access is not slowed or restructed in any way.
Then there is the lovely village of greerton. You cannot do 4 laning through tgat section without destroying the Cameron road parking. I predict massive disruption once again. Just like in stage one.
Leave greerton alone is my plea. Sure upgrade the water stuff but leave the parking as is. Otherwise you will destroy this area altogether
Meanwhile
Posted on 29-08-2025 10:16 | By First Responder
If there's that much money available, I suggest you sort Turret Road first. No, that's in the too hard basket. Leave it for the next generation. We'll, all you businesses on Cameron Rd, nows the time to think about your future. You are going to have 3 years of a colossal balls up, right outside your shops. There will be no parking for your customers. You are going to see multiple people in Hiviz filling out health and safety documents, and if you look real hard, you might find a worker. Clearly TCC don't listen to us, the ratepayers. Time for a new mayor.
Factors
Posted on 29-08-2025 12:47 | By morepork
It SHOULD be as simple as reviewing the disaster that was phase one, learning from it, designing a suitable solution that we can afford, then doing it.
But it isn't.
There are factors that have nothing to do with road construction that have to be considered.
NZTA won't come to the party but we can POSSIBLY get a deal from IAF? We have more financial options if we do it NOW.
"Do it now! We won't get a great solution, but we'll get SOMETHING (and Ratepayers will pick up the slack if it all goes pear-shaped...)"
Is this the kind of desperation you want driving our city planning?
We should be planning and doing what we can afford, and in a timeframe driven by the project's requirements, not external factors.
If we can't afford it, don't do it. At least, not until we CAN afford it.
Smoke and mirrors
Posted on 29-08-2025 13:41 | By Kancho
Stage 2 costed at $164 million, but the redesign was estimated to cost $98.8m. What a bargain to perpetuate Stage one which had huge overrun cost. And all for no improvement apart from pipes etc . So rate increases and targeted rates etc in double digits forever. No one I have ever heard says stage one was any good
Barkes corner
Posted on 30-08-2025 09:38 | By Kancho
Seems to me the stage two was to extend to Barkes corner where a much more important underpass is desperately needed but hey ho priorities are more on the same as stage one debacle
Have some common sense
Posted on 31-08-2025 14:07 | By drgoon
This time, can you not install the dedicated cyclist pedestrian crossing buttons and hand rails. A completely woke and unnecessary cost at $100k per intersection!!!
Cameron Rd definitely needs 4 lanes.
Every day it is log jammed from Barkes Cnr to Church Rd Gate Pa... BUT, what are you going to do about the idiot changes you made in Greerton between Cornwall and Chadwick??
Stage one
Posted on 06-09-2025 11:03 | By Kancho
Besides no improvement apart from new pipes Stage one had huge over runs on cost I think double from original and disastrous impact on businesses. So I would bet that Stage 2 will be the same . Think of a figure and double it
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.