A large metal dragon that mysteriously appeared at Mount Maunganui’s Pilot Bay has been given its marching orders by Tauranga City Council.
The striking 1.2m sculpture, perched atop a 1.5-tonne rock, was placed on the council-owned site at the corner of Commons Ave and The Mall by Graham and Carol Foote.
The couple transported the statue from their Pukehina property under the cover of night.
Installed without permission, the sculpture – handcrafted from scrap vehicle parts by artists in South Africa – was intended to be a surprise public gift, in the spirit of Banksy-style art.
“If you ask for permission, it takes years. Better to ask for forgiveness – which we got none. But that’s okay,” Graham said.

The dragon, made from scrap metal, sitting on a large rock at night, at the end of Commons Ave, near Pilot Bay. Photo / Rosalie Liddle Crawford
They said the guerrilla-style installation was an attempt to bring art to the public – but they were told on September 2 it must be removed within seven days.
“The council want it removed. We didn’t quite understand the reasoning – being that it didn’t fit in with the cultural values of Tauranga. We thought it was a taniwha protecting the waterways,” said Graham.
The council granted a one-week extension to the removal deadline and have put a temporary barrier fence around the dragon for safety.
The sculpture won’t fit in their Mount home so Graham has contacted nearby property owners to see if the statue can be relocated.
Despite some local support and an offer by the Footes to donate, maintain and care for the sculpture long-term, the council ruled the artwork in breach of its Street Use and Public Places Bylaw, Graham said.

Graham and Carol Foote next to their 1.2m metal dragon sculpture which they have placed at the end of Commons Ave, Mount Maunganui. Photo / Rosalie Liddle Crawford
A letter from the council said the dragon did not meet the criteria under its Civic Art Policy or Public Art Framework.
The Weekend Sun approached the council about the statue and was referred to the letter sent to the Footes.
Council bylaws officer Todd Martin said the piece, while appreciated, lacked the “cultural or artistic significance specific to the Tauranga area” required for permanent placement in a public space.
“The sculpture’s current location presents potential risks to the public, particularly as it is not a council-managed asset and lacks formal assessment or protective measures,” the letter said.

The dragon sculpture will be removed. Photo / Brydie Thompson
“Respectfully, the dragon sculpture cannot remain at its current location.”
The dragon, which weighs two tonnes, was with the Footes for five years and was crafted entirely from scrap metal components like nuts, bolts, old tools, padlocks, horseshoes and car parts.
It was originally a birthday gift to Carol, bought from Art of Outdoors in Pyes Pa – a business that imports unique recycled-metal sculptures from South Africa, with proceeds supporting artists’ families back in their country.
“We had it on our orchard overlooking our lake at Pukehina, but we’re selling that property now because we’re heading towards 70,” said Graham.
Carol suggested bringing the sculpture closer to their Pilot Bay home.
Graham carefully manoeuvred the sculpture into place with the help from a trailer, winch and a Landcruiser.
“The disappointing part is that the council doesn’t see it as having any artistic value. We said we’d gift it to the council, maintain it, everything. But they think it’s a hazard and not art. It’s kind of disappointing, but understandable – because we broke the law.”
The couple said the council has been “very easy to talk with”.

The Footes intended to gift the sculpture to Tauranga. Photo / Rosalie Liddle Crawford
They’re hoping it can be placed somewhere they can still see it.
Graham didn’t want it at Te Puna Quarry Park, known for its myriad of sculptures and art installations.
“I’ll never see it. I want to drive past it. It’s about making people happy.”
The episode is the latest frustration for the Footes, who had also faced a three-year bureaucratic saga trying to gift 9ha of land at Pukehina to a local wetland society.
They said mounting red tape and legal costs slowed their charitable intentions.
“That’s why I didn’t ask about the statue. I thought: ‘I could be dead before they [the council] make a decision’,” Graham said.
For now, the dragon awaits a new home – one where it can continue to delight passersby without running afoul of city bylaws.



23 comments
Waiting, Waiting, Waiting
Posted on 12-09-2025 07:24 | By Thats Nice
"No artistic value and it didn’t fit in with the cultural values of Tauranga?" What a load of bollocks TCC. This is an amazing sculpture made of scrap metal. Such a damn shame and hey, it's free unlike some of the VERY expensive eyesores the taxpayer has had to pay for in the Tauranga CBD!!!
Yes, they should have got permission but as Graham says, he would die waiting for a response.
Errr, no.
Posted on 12-09-2025 07:54 | By Lepidorrhachis mooreana
Hi Carol and Graham. Well intentioned- definite tick, charitable- tick, imposing your own ideas of what public space art should be- definite tick, reading the room on cultural values/ mana significant to the area- definite cross, appropriating art from another culture and attempting to slot it into a 'convenient' Maori narrative- definite cross.
C'mon guys, swallow your pride and put the dragon in a private space somewhere. To have done the mission in such a furtive fashion was a bit silly.
Putting civics aside, personally speaking, your dragon art is a dated, lowbrow mess consigned it to the 1990's.
Eye-sore
Posted on 12-09-2025 08:30 | By unltd1nfantry
It's cool but ugly... with sharp objects! It wouldn't be long before a kid comes along and get's a horn in the head or something stupid.
Why not?
Posted on 12-09-2025 08:42 | By lisah
Would look great relocated in Coronation Park which hosts the popular markets and would be a talking and photo opportunity for our visiting cruise boat travellers. The council don't mind unauthorized installments in Coronation Park, such as tents in bushes, so why not house a homeless dragon? Personally I'd love more fantasy sculptures to balance maori carvings and spiky modern things. We are after all a very mixed race country.
World gone Woke
Posted on 12-09-2025 08:56 | By rogue
Who care about the cultural significance of an art installation ? Seriously? The council has the opportunity to get something for nothing and instead they probably want to waste more money on something else we don't want or need.
I would of thought this was the perfect depiction of a make believe creature whether you phrase it as a dragon or a taniwha. Have it delivered to Devenport Rd and plank it on the footpath outside their castle.
It needs saying
Posted on 12-09-2025 09:05 | By bigted
If we all decided to put our 'art' in random places around the city it would soon become a huge unsightly mess.
This 'art' cannot not be safe for children as it has spikes and cannot be safe unless fenced.
A well intentioned gift to our city, buts sadly, sometimes the rules are there for a good reason.
Agree with Lepidorrhachis
Posted on 12-09-2025 09:17 | By This Guy
I don't hate the thing, but it has no place being at the Mount, pretty offensive to try to claim it's "taniwha protecting the waterways" when it has absolutely NO connection to Maori culture. If you want to see the thing every day, then stick it in YOUR front garden. Not everyone is so keen on your pile of scrap metal as you are - "mounting red tape and legal costs slowed their charitable intentions." TOO BAD, that's the process you have to follow to get public art installed, why do you think you should be above the rules that everyone else has to follow?? (Also comparing yourself to Banksy? LMAO... I don't see any biting social commentary from this generic dragon sculpture)
Delightful
Posted on 12-09-2025 10:28 | By Equality
I think it is an absolutely delightful little dragon! Prettier than some of the Cultural stuff we see around the city!! Thank you Carol and Graham for the tiny look. :)
Dragon
Posted on 12-09-2025 10:31 | By LyricalSoul
Eew Yuk my spirit said as soon as I saw it, for a dragon represents death & destruction.
This beast is very real in the spiritual realm, & he orders satan to be the cause of all the evil in the world you hear & see currently, & all these events were foretold & are written in the bible, research it for yourselves.
Urgently God is giving man one final opportunity to choose & decide whom they will follow, as that is the deciding factor where you will spend eternity, & God doesn't want anyone to perish.
To the couple who made this statue, it isn't just a statue, it is a symbol of the underground, if you want a dragon on your property then go ahead, but I'm glad the council ordered it's removal.
Confirmation
Posted on 12-09-2025 12:09 | By nerak
Tauranga residents are RULED by morons. I like it, don't know where it should hang out, but while Council bylaws officer Todd Martin said the piece, while appreciated, lacked the “cultural or artistic significance specific to the Tauranga area” required for permanent placement in a public space. WHAT?? THE ACTUAL???
“The sculpture’s current location presents potential risks to the public, REALLY??? HOW?? ANY MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE EXORBITANT BIT OF STEEL IN RED SQUARE??particularly as it is not a council-managed asset and lacks formal assessment or protective measures,” the letter said." And herein lies the rub, it's not council managed, read, they get no $$ for it.
Who gave TCC the right to RULE it's ratepayers with an iron fist and total stupidity? FFS TTC all of you, go now.
Oh for goodness sake…
Posted on 12-09-2025 12:28 | By SweetCherries
I think the dragon is gorgeous and such a community minded thing to have done. Bravo to the owners! I can see why they bypassed the council (deep sigh….).
As for safety, a nice circular fence with a spiky top should stop any idiots who feel the need to climb on it (why?)…
Why does everything have to fit ‘the ethos’ these days, what about a little free thinking and imagination? Well done you two!
Not a Banksy I'm afraid!
Posted on 12-09-2025 12:34 | By Ben Dover
One man's meat is another man's poison and, like marmite, you either love it or hate it. It does nothing for me and there are to many sharp objects on it that could be dangerous for kids who may play on it! If you enjoy it, then best you keep it in your garden.
Taniwha - Dragon
Posted on 12-09-2025 13:26 | By Considered
@ Lepidorrhachis mooreana
Quote from the "Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand":
'Taniwha - Supernatural Beings, they lurked in watery dens, or in caves, and were often depicted as dragons or serpents, with fiery eyes and lashing tails.'
Saying it is not cultural is WRONG.
The woke bureaucrats of TCC were extremely quick to emblazon Cameron Road with all sorts of Māori myth and folklore as well as mega murals and their interpretation of "art" at the extreme cost of the ratepayers without consultation (remebering what TCC's definition of 'consultation' is)
@ LyricalSoul - your imaginary deity & unproven whisperings of a spirit are no different to others belief and enjoyment of the fantasy realms of dragons, elves, dwarven folk and hobbits.
I would also be happy to have this statue in my possession and on full display for other to enjoy...
Council in action
Posted on 12-09-2025 14:14 | By First Responder
"Of course the council wants to get rid of this dragon — it’s too honest a reflection of them.
It’s rusty, patched together with bits that don’t quite fit, and hasn’t breathed fire in years.
Instead of removing it, they should put a plaque in front of it reading:
‘Council in Action – Beautiful but immovable, made of scraps, costs a fortune to shift.’
At least then we’d be getting some public art and some public honesty."
New Council mascot
Posted on 12-09-2025 14:20 | By First Responder
Perfect idea, council — get rid of the one piece of art that actually represents you.
A clunky, patchwork dragon, made of mismatched bits, held together with rust and hope, sitting there doing absolutely nothing.
It’s basically a life-size model of your decision-making process.
Don’t remove it — put it outside council chambers so we all know exactly what we’re dealing with:
A giant, expensive sculpture that just sits there looking busy while achieving absolutely nothing."
Awesome gift
Posted on 12-09-2025 15:54 | By BJWD
Wow — and it's free! Unlike the expensive, oversized statues we've been forced to pay for without our consent. It's refreshing to see something meaningful contributed by locals, at no cost to the community. We're incredibly fortunate to have residents like the Foote family here in Tauranga and the Mount. It's just a shame our council continues to show such a lack of common sense. I truly hope more capable, community-minded residents will step up and put themselves forward to lead — we need a council that genuinely reflects the values and voice of our people."
The dragon within us
Posted on 12-09-2025 16:39 | By Leprechaun
Hi Graham and Carole,
This is a work of art. It’s just taken someone a lot of thought, effort and skill to bring that dragon together.
It could easily represent a Taniwha.
I’m sure with some negotiation the council could go to a compromise about where it should sit.
I wonder if you had gone through the correct process whether it would have been accepted.
I think you might have cheesed some of the council off by not allowing them some input, so they’ve thrown the toys out of the cot.
Of course art is very subjective and not everybody will agree on what is good or not good aesthetic or not aesthetic.
I wish you well whatever your artwork ends up and thank you for your kind gesture of it being free with maintenance even.
Dunno much about Art...
Posted on 12-09-2025 17:18 | By morepork
...but I know what I like".
The beautiful thing about all true Art is the diverse and individual reactions it evokes.
Council has no more right to say that it ISN'T Art than they do to say that they are doing a wonderful job managing Tauranga; these are matters of opinion.
The placement of the dragon was definitely illegal, but did it really do any harm?
Certainly, we can't just have people dropping Art (or piles of junk, depending on your perception...) around the City.
I read all of the current comments with interest and they reflect a good cross section of opinion. (And some very good points were made...)
TCC should have required its removal purely on legal grounds, kept their opinions to themselves, and not set themselves up as arbiters of Art and Culture.
Like so many other areas, they are not skilled or qualified.
@BJWD
Posted on 12-09-2025 17:26 | By morepork
"I truly hope more capable, community-minded residents will step up and put themselves forward to lead — we need a council that genuinely reflects the values and voice of our people."
Amen to that.
I actually loved the dragon and I'm sorry it's being taken away. I see it as an interesting construction with artistic merit and not in any way an eyesore.
It really doesn't matter whether it is symbolic of a taniwha or not, it can stand on its own merit.
We have Asian and Welsh people in our community, and dragons have a large place in their folklore.
Besides, most of us, as children, heard stories where the dragon was overcome by the good guys and evil was vanquished.
I can't see ANY grounds for banishing it on "cultural grounds".
@First Responder
Posted on 12-09-2025 17:29 | By morepork
Congratulations! You get my first prize of all the responses at time of writing (including my own... :-)) Your post is pretty much perfect and it certainly made my day. Thanks.
Overit
Posted on 12-09-2025 18:53 | By overit
I loved it & am sorry it had to be removed. Thank you Footes for the joy it has bought me. I am Welsh & saw it as a Welsh Dragon, I loved its components.
My Granddaughter would love this beastie!
Posted on 12-09-2025 19:15 | By Watchdog
My Granddaughter is fascinated by dragons, and even has a black cat named "Toothless".
She would love to have it sitting around our place, as would I. I think he is cute. He also would not cost much to feed, either. He even looks friendly.
Its a great created piece of art. I am very impressed.
Would happily look after it at our place but then it would be largely out of sight of the public. And I sure could not lift it at my age.
We need a good home for this chappie folks.
Cultural?
Posted on 16-09-2025 15:27 | By Yadick
Doesn't fit what culture? Is this a racist removal.
Perhaps it could go down to Memorial Park and sit near the other non-cultural statue - you know, Humpty Dumpty or perhaps with the non-cultural Hairy McLeary and friends . . .
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.