Tauranga City Council is facing rates blowouts of Kaipara proportions in the next few years due to a massive sewerage scheme that will have to be paid for by ratepayers due to failed growth.
Tauranga accountant Ian Stevenson claims ratepayers will be forced to pay for the city's southern pipeline project because growth funding has failed.
Work on the southern pipeline.
'Tauranga City Council is borrowing all the money in the hope that in the future the predictions of Smartgrowth's concept called ‘Growth pays for Growth' will provide an avalanche of fees,” says Ian.
'That obviously undermines the project and its viability, but most importantly the ability to pay the debt resulting from it.”
To pay for the southern pipeline about 40,000 new houses will have to be built in Tauranga in the next 20-30 years, or the city will have to virtually double in size, claims Ian.
That means 1300-2000 new dwellings each and every year.
In 2006/2007 there were 1112 new buildings. In 2011/12 there were 690. For the first six months of the 2012/13 year there were 420 new dwellings, according to Ian, who cites the figures from Smartgrowth.
As incentive to building growth the city council discounted its building consent fees in July last year. That decision makes it more difficult for the council to raise the money to pay all the debt.
'Someone has to pay. It's not going to be the ‘growth' areas, so sooner or later it will fall back on the ratepayers,” says Ian.
'Due to the lack of consent fees being paid currently and for the short to mid-term, Council cannot sustain itself in its present form financially, and make its interest and debt payments annually.
'Interest rates are historically low now. That will not last. Normally the rates are 7-10 per cent, meaning that the current debt burden is low and a short term aberration.
'The council is in the invidious position where the self-imposed limit has already been exceeded. The result will be that the interest rate will increase on any new borrowings and when the existing debt comes up for renewal.”
At the end of the 2012 financial year Tauranga City's interest bearing debt was $460m. In 2002 it was $52m, $171m in 2007, and $394 million in 2010. The city's total income for the year ended 2012, is $168m. That makes the city debt to income ratio 274 per cent says Ian, past the self-imposed 250 per cent limit.
Tauranga City Council chief executive officer Leigh Auton disputes Ian's debt figure, saying the Council's published 2011/12 Annual Report states net debt at $391million as at June 30, 2012, with a debt to revenue ratio of 243 per cent, below the limit in the Treasury Policy of 250 per cent.
Ian's debt figure of $460 million is taken from the TCC audited annual accounts, page 161.
The total of $459.47 million is obtained by adding the current borrowings, payable in less than 12 months of $111.6 million, plus the long term over 12 months borrowings of $309 million – a total of 420.7 million.
'From this Council looks to have then deducted $26.279 million being the 'cash & cash equivalent” giving a 'net debt” of $394 million, not far away from the council's amount of $391 million,” says Ian.
The rest of the total comes from the Derivative Financial Instruments, which the council hasn't included, but Ian has because he says it is a debt, and is recorded in the balance sheet.
A ‘derivative' is a security whose price is dependent upon or derived from one or more underlying assets. The derivative itself is merely a contract with its value determined by fluctuations in the underlying asset.
Common underlying assets include stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, interest rates and market indexes. Most derivatives are characterised by high leverage.
'There is no information available to say exactly what the DFIs are and what therefore are the potential risks related to them are in the future, but I would suspect that the DFIs recorded are intended to limit the exposure to interest rate changes,” says Ian.
'The annual report records some information at note 17a-b, there is an indication of the amounts involved and the exposure the council potentially has. The notes to the accounts record that the DFIs are traded according to council policy. Regardless, they are a debt and have a cost. I included them in the figures I provided.”
The face value of the DFI assets is $135 million and the face value of DFI liabilities is $324.5 million, the net present value is a liability of $38.849 million recorded in the 2014 year, and that the net cost to TCC in the year to June 30, 2012 is $15.709 million.
The $15.709 million is the cost to council for the one year only, reflected in the increase in liability value recorded. It's easy to see in the change of value in the balance sheet from $22.533 million in 2011 to $38.849m of city council debt.
'If the council are saying that these are not 'debts/liabilities” then why are they recorded in the Tauranga City Council Balance Sheet, why is there a $15m cost deducted from income for the year on them,” says Ian.
When the DFI liability is added to the city council borrowings, the debt is $460 million.
Approximately 50 per cent of current debt is being repaid from rates; the balance is predominately from user fees, says Leigh.
So far nearly half of the pipeline, from Maleme Street to Memorial Park, has been completed at a cost of $40.4 million.
The harbour crossing to Te Maunga is due to be completed by June 2016 and is budgeted to cost $62.1 million. The project is currently within the $102.4 million budget, says Leigh.
'The southern pipeline is still required despite the recent slowdown in growth as the Chapel Street Waste Water Treatment Plant is already nearing capacity and struggles every time there is a storm event, resulting in sewage overflows further back up the line,” says Leigh. 'In fact the recent slowdown in growth has effectively bought us a bit of time.”
The council is currently collecting about $8-15 million a year (2010, 2011 and 2012) in subdivision impact fees and building impact fees, says Ian, much less than pre-2006, which he says leaves no likelihood of Tauranga City Council being able to pay off the capital debt or interest on the borrowings without adding significantly to all city rates.
The city council must pay someone else interest on the money already borrowed.
At current interest rates of about six per cent that amounts to $27.6 million a year, or 27 per cent of the annual rates. Rates income for the city in the 2011/2012 year was $99million, in the 2012/2013 year it is forecast to be $103m, including new ratepayers.
'Should future growth remain as is for the next five to eight years and the Southern Pipeline/Te Maunga rebuild be completed at a cost of around $290 million, then there is no way to pay the debt except by increasing rates, perhaps by as much as 100 per cent in four to five years' time,” says Ian.
'But I guess that unpalatable decision will not fall on most of the current batch of elected members.
'Regardless, the project needs to be stopped ASAP if Tauranga is to have a chance to survive.”



42 comments
Don't rely on Mount sewage plant
Posted on 08-02-2013 15:46 | By Steve Morris
Having a centralised sewage system for the whole city is not planning best practice. Not only would a satellite plant in Tauriko have been significantly cheaper, it would reduce the city's reliance on the Te Maunga plant should it be inoperable due to earthquake, technical problem or some other natural hazard.
Info for Steve Morris
Posted on 08-02-2013 17:14 | By Gee Really
I used to think that a new plant would be best until I talked to an engineer friend. He pointed out that any plant needs to discharge treated waste. That would still mean a pipeline from say Tauriko to the discharge point. So I'm not sure how we get around this.
So the City
Posted on 08-02-2013 18:02 | By Sambo
is in the S**t, once again why was a highly paid city manager 3 years ago allowed to walk away, and what do priority one, and all the other inane Council funded groups return for playing with our rates, and you did not have to be a 'Rhodes Scholar" 3 years ago to see the building industry was slowing, all you had to do was look at the immigration statistics, but any sort of nous is way beyond the people we have making decisions with our dollars, election year, once again who is going to stand up?, I still say get the "Port Authority" board to run the place, lets become a company town, after all we sell our sports teams, our City can be Tauranga the abyss, in other words a big bloody hole to throw money in!!!!
EXTINCTION OF RATEPAYERS
Posted on 08-02-2013 19:26 | By Crash test dummies
So Steve you are right the door is being closed on ratepayers now. A satellite plant is cheaper, better, less risk, more efficient and would be where needed. Got to wonder why it is happening right when should not have started. You are right with it tall.
As they say the S*** is going to hit the fan like night follows day
Posted on 08-02-2013 21:59 | By RORTSCAM
Don't worry about growth funding this eye watering 'gastronomic' delight mate it should never be shipped halfway across the universe anyway- bad environmental practice bad financial practice @ over $300million +++ and rocketing away each day.You don't need a central crapper you want to spread it around a bit so as to eliminate a single catastrophic pipeline to Te Maunga to avoid the fate of Christchurch.Ian and Steve are right sorry Gee Really you have missed the nightcart.Fith time again this week for TCC.
MAGICAL MYSTERY TOUR ACROSS TOWN
Posted on 09-02-2013 10:25 | By MISS ADVENTURE
Seems that our Councillors just do not know what they are doing nor what they have done. Can't believe that they believe that the Council debt is just $394m, I wandered into the Library and looked at the 2011 2012 TCC accounts and see that the figures Stevenson says are the ones on there, I could not find CEO Leigh Afton's amount anywhere. That tells me that no one in Council can simply read and see that the number Council staff give them are complete rubbish. Very similar in quality as the intended content of the Southern Sewerage Pipeline :) That I would say is more than a coincedents! It looks like complete madness to have a 23km pipeline crossing town one side to the other to centralise 100% of the treatment processes. The Kanaka plant cost about $27m and would handle about 50% of the total capacity of the Southern pipeline. Of Course even Arthrogram admitted last year that that all of the projections they had made were all falling apart and just were not going to happen, these projections were the basis for the VERY RUSHED decision to build the Southern Pipeline. On top of that the costings to justify it were all wrong, how anyone could believe that a $27m plant was more expensive than a $300m or more plant is beyond me, I just have to wonder how that got justified, although anything is possible in Council speak.
BAILOUT NO 8
Posted on 09-02-2013 10:41 | By MISS ADVENTURE
This is the mother of all bailouts, all on its own it is capable of the complete implosion of Tauranga City.
Retired
Posted on 09-02-2013 13:28 | By jeancraven@kinect.co.nz
Sorry I can't afford to pay for any more of your blunders.
Pipe dreams and lines...
Posted on 09-02-2013 16:20 | By Val Hallah
Thank you Mr Stevenson for being so vigilant and staying with this exposure of what can only be deemed as and incredible mismanagement, compounded by a conspiracy of misleading information, not just with this project, but many other aspects of council activity. What seems to be emerging, is a clear pattern of egos in power, grasping at ways to immortalize themselves in community services, but gambling blindly with the communities money instead of their own, to achieve this.New Zealand history shows that most of greatly respected icons of their time, arrived at this status by using their own capital, or at least treated the communities as if it were their own. The figures presented here show no signs of this, and nothing learned from the two previous recessions. I wonder is personal accountability and performance based salaries would change this result. Pipe dreaming seems to have spread further afield than the meth labs now!!
SHOCKING NEWS FOR MOOST
Posted on 09-02-2013 17:06 | By MISS ADVENTURE
Looks to me that most ratepayers will be completely unaware of the just how bad the finances at Tauranga Council are (that is before any merger of local Councils actually make it worse anyway). If I understand the above reporting, Tauranga has $460m debt already and plans to borrow at least another $220m (if no cost blowouts) so that means $680m debt in total. that looks to be about 400% ratio of income to debt. That is a lot worse than they all think, there is no way to avoid that debt and no way to repay enough debt to allow the project to happen without borrowing. Looks to me that these decisions are all made by a bunch of Fith officals and Counilors who can not see past what they are told to believe.
LEADER OF THE PACK
Posted on 09-02-2013 17:09 | By MISS ADVENTURE
The Projects Committee that looked at this and sent it to Tauranga Council recommending it for approval was headed up by Bill Fauklner, the ratepayers champion, this is what happens when he self professes to be helping ratepayers wonder what would happen if he actually was working against the ratepayers. Would that actually be worse, I suspect not.
DOUBLE DEUCE
Posted on 09-02-2013 23:10 | By Crash test dummies
Looks to me that all of us ratepayers have drawn the joker card for this lot that are residing at Council at the moment, they have been there way to long. Perhaps the damage is already done, perhaps its broken beyond repair but if nothing else happens they all need to know that the time that they have allocated to theemselves to play fiddle-da-dee fiddle-de-dum with our money has ended. There is no way that Tauranga residence can afford to pay double the rates within 4-5 years. Tauranga will look like a former mining town at this rate by then. Us Aucklanders leave Auckland to get away from these things last thing we want is to be buried in it at the holiday home to. Following this pattern the next thing that will happen is that Len Brown will move to Tauranga, almost worth moving back to Auckland if that happened.
JEAN CRAVEN
Posted on 10-02-2013 10:36 | By MISS ADVENTURE
Well looks to me that is to late and does not mattter, if you can not pay the rates because they are way to high or any other reason they can just sell you up to get the money they want, no questions asked.
FIDDLE THE BOOKS
Posted on 10-02-2013 11:49 | By Crash test dummies
That is what it is, pretend to Councillors thast the debt is $391m when it is really $460m, it is plain and simple that the leadership is not so proven as they themselves would like to believe about themselves. The real issue here is that ratepayers are the only ones who will have to pay the piper sooner or later.
BILL
Posted on 10-02-2013 15:43 | By Crash test dummies
Good old chap Bill is was the chairman of the Projects Committee that approved the southern sewer pipe and plant upgrade at a cost guess of about $270m, perhaps Bill could explain how he is going to pay the mortgage without increasing rates. The would be something amazing to see and hear.
MONKEY BRAINS
Posted on 10-02-2013 17:52 | By PLONKER
To much monkeying around loks like to me and some. But at the end of it all there is a lot of money been borrowed and spent and not a lot to show for it.
PROJECTS COMMITTEE
Posted on 11-02-2013 14:03 | By YOGI
Looked at the Southern Pipeline project and then it was approved by that committee then Council to go ahead. Council already know that Smartgrowth's projections are all wrong (Council was told by Smartgrowth August 2012, everyone else knew years before) so why is this project still proceding onward, all that is going to happen is that the city will be bankrupted to do it when it is not needed. Why does it take to stop these obvious things from happening and continuing?
PROJECTS CHAIRMAN
Posted on 11-02-2013 20:42 | By PLONKER
At that time was Bill Faulkner.
BILL
Posted on 12-02-2013 10:19 | By Crash test dummies
Good old chap Bill "The ratepayers champion" was the chairman of the Projects Committee that approved the southern sewer pipe and plant upgrade at a cost guess of about $270m, perhaps Bill could explain to all the grandchildren of all the citizens of Tauranga how he is going to pay the mortgage over the 100 years without increasing rates. The would be something amazing to see and hear.
BLAMING BILL?
Posted on 12-02-2013 11:35 | By YOGI
Can't just blame him alone, they all voted for it so they all made the mistake on this one. But you watch them all do the self preservation thing at the drop of a hat.
Advice Ignored
Posted on 12-02-2013 17:47 | By Jitter
Well before the Southern Pipeline was approved by TCC they were advised by a number of experienced engineers and others that this was not the way to go. They were given details and costings of successful satellite plants from other places in NZ and Australia. They were advised that satellite sewage plants at various points around the city would be far more effective eg if one failed the rest would continue to operate and only one area of the city would be effected. With the Southern Pipeline failing the whole city would be effected. Satellite plants is the way many cities are going overseas. They were also advised that the overall cost of three or four satellite plants would be far far less than the Southern Pipeline. TCC listened to greedy consultants and the idiots at Smartgrowth who have not got anything right ever. TCC then gave the contract to their favoured contractors. Time to disestablish money wasting Smartgrowth as they are constantly costing the ratepayers unneccessary millions of dollars with their extravagant madcap ideas. Stop the Southern Pipeline construction now and only continue when substantial development starts again throughout the city. The councillors who are on the council now and were there when the decision was made to build the Southern Pipeline should not be voted in again. Take note Bill F. On top of this as has been mentioned, once the pipeline is completed (if ever) there will be around another $100 million plus required to upgrade the sewage plant at Te Maunga. Absolutely ridiculous and a complete waste of money. People cannot continue to pay for madcap ideas through their rates.The city cannot support additional debt.
SOUTHERN PIPELINE
Posted on 12-02-2013 23:52 | By PLONKER
That is going to cost $135M, with interest and all the otehr costs that will be $166m and that is without a 'cost blowout'. Add to that, the Southern Pipeline arriving at Te Maunga will be completely pointless until the plant there is expanded at a cost perhaps of anotehr $130m so all up the cost looks to be about $260-290m without one single surprise. Add to all of this that the all of Tauranga's Sewerage treatment will all be in one place just like Christchurch. There are many other options and they are betetr than this plan so you have to ask why is all of this being built and at a very large cost?
Better alternatives
Posted on 13-02-2013 11:00 | By YOGI
There are many and lots are cheaper and a lot more enviromentally friendly than the current plan, seems like there is little time givent o looking at these things and what they will mean after today, most important to look at tomorrow, the consequence and take a long term view.
Ratepayer rort
Posted on 15-02-2013 07:24 | By Crash test dummies
Cant thst this is going to end well for ratepayers of Tauranga any time soon, becomes obvious why government changed local government law.
Jitter
Posted on 18-02-2013 11:32 | By YOGI
Yes you are right, Council was advised by many that this was a very bad option, to expensive, wrong place, wrong tech and for many other reasons also. I can not see that this is a good idea at all, even for the cost of it there is no money to pay for it when you read what is written above, why is this not being looked at as to carry on with this is going to have the same fate as Kaipara, you can just see it coming at ya!
Derivatives
Posted on 18-02-2013 17:28 | By PLONKER
They are really bad, this is what some banks like Bern & Steen went bust over, these are basically very speculative, risky and potentially very highly geared. Anythign goes wrong the costs rocket and the Council will be left with a huge debt left to pay to get out of them. None of this is at all good, you can see the start of the problem already where teh debt has increased from $22 million to $38 million in one year, about 75%. The internaitonal markets are not looking good so I can not see how this is safe, good, beneficial anyway soon to ratepayers.
Smartgrowth
Posted on 19-02-2013 09:25 | By YOGI
They said that it is all wrong so why is this pipe still happening?
Deadly pipe pushes on by the looks
Posted on 19-02-2013 15:33 | By YOGI
Another nail in the coffin of ratepayers as the next phase rentlessly rolls on despite the obvious otherwise.
Leigh Auton
Posted on 22-02-2013 09:29 | By YOGI
If he thinks the figures are wrong and they come from the Annual Report of TCC then perhaps Leigh can show us where "else" his figures are from. The numbers are a lot different by some $70m so the reasons must be easy to see.
Mother of all bailouts
Posted on 23-02-2013 23:07 | By PLONKER
The development of the Tauranga area can not sustain the debt that will be created, the SIF and BIF fees for sections and houses can not possible generate enough to pay the interest nevermind pay the existing debt interest never mond pay any debt back. Just look at Route K debt at $60m and rising every year, the same is going to happen here as well.
Building fees
Posted on 24-02-2013 07:54 | By TERMITE
It is obvious that the BIF's and so on collected have reduced a lot from years before, say 2005 where over $50m was collected but now only about $8m. The expectation was and is that the $50m will continue onward every year and all the money is borrowed on that hope and dream then that happens next is that the debt does nto get paid. The concept seems rather simple really.
half price building consents
Posted on 24-02-2013 15:12 | By PLONKER
Looks to me that the value received is a lot lower also because of the discount also given from last year, that means the money collected is even less than before.
Who bails out the ratepayer?
Posted on 25-02-2013 11:17 | By YOGI
At the moment the ratepayers are being slugged from all directions day and night just like the perverbial punch bag but there is no bell to ring to end the run, a knock out is not an excuse to stop anything and no clock is ticking to know when the round is completed. There is no escape but to leave TOWN!
Facing a bailout?
Posted on 26-02-2013 12:09 | By YOGI
it is already here and hitting the pocket of every ratepayer now because of the mushrooming debt and interest.
slowdown
Posted on 28-02-2013 11:24 | By Capt_Kaveman
this has been coming for almost 8 years some of this $ should have gone into renewing the old system that have been failing, the lakes as such like many TCC ideas were dead ducks before they started, one reason maybe is all these current council members are not from this area or not born local so there is yr problem = kick them all out and vote for locals.citizen monitored council
Capt Kaveman
Posted on 01-03-2013 07:03 | By YOGI
Agree on most bro, 'locals' may sound good but really just a few clues woul;d be an improvement. I think the real problem is that the tail is wagging the dog. citizen monitored council
Fleas
Posted on 01-03-2013 08:53 | By TERMITE
I think that the flea is wagging the tail that is wagging the dog. The flea or fleas resides in the bowels of TCC somewhere and one will be challenged to find and offload the free loader anytime soon as they have their hooks well and truly impaled into the tail of the dog.
Misguided
Posted on 01-03-2013 14:30 | By TERMITE
Looks to me that the whole path that TCC have chosen ehre has just about taken us all to the door step of Pandora's box, be careful out there as the next step maybe the last to make with a choice. After that we will be lucky to have a vote ahead of a commissioner being appointed.
Slowdown but not TCC
Posted on 05-03-2013 08:50 | By YOGI
TCC has not and the result is huge debt, no money left and the future of the average ratepayers is at best tenuous!
pandora's panda-moan-ium
Posted on 05-03-2013 12:21 | By YOGI
Just a little step further and the whole thing crumbles, can't see any escape from it this side of it, the future of the City, the decendants are going to be mortgaged to tehhilt and some, no excape.
kaveman
Posted on 06-03-2013 18:19 | By PLONKER
On the money mate and anything TCC touches becomes "fools-gold" in an instant and then it gets worse ...
Plans are changing
Posted on 08-03-2013 11:20 | By TERMITE
Looks like TCC want to avoid the train bridge across to Matipihi, in that new and more cunning plan TCC will seek to cut across from the bottom end of Fraser Street to the walkway then carry on as planned before. That will save a lot of disruption in Devonport Road to teh CBD as the plan before was to wander down to Elizabeth Street then to the rail Bridge. Whatever is done it will costs a hepa a money. I guess that a heap of consultants will get another slice out of this one for sure as a redesign, plans and another slug at it will create a huge feast and some.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.