Leading community organisations and institutions are meeting in Tauranga today to discuss the next steps in creating a joint local alcohol policy for the Western Bay of Plenty region.
Western Bay and Tauranga City Councillors along with police, the district health board, community boards and organisations are meeting decide on whether a common alcohol policy is best for the sub-region.
It will be decided whether the existing joint governance committee, or separate committee be established to formulate local alcohol policies to allow communities a greater say in the number of liquor outlets, locations and opening and closing hours under the recent reforms.
Feedback reports that residents in both the Western Bay and city communities already believe there are too many outlets where alcohol is sold.
The general tenor of the response to an earlier survey is 58 per cent of the wider community thinks there are already too many liquor outlets in their suburb. A total of 40 per cent say there are about the right number and one per cent says there are not enough.
There were 805 responses to the community and online surveys with Papamoa having by far the biggest number of responses at 144. The next Bellevue, Bellevue-Otumoetai, Brookfield Bureta and Judea had 57. There were 50 replies from Cherrywood, Otumoetai, Pillans Point.
The Western BOP communities are far more anti-alcohol than all the city suburbs except for Papamoa and Greerton, which both are firmly of the view (87 per cent and 74 per cent) that there are too many liquor outlets.
Te Puke's 85 per cent against more liquor outlets, Te Puna is 74 per cent, Katikati 72 per cent.
The community also want to keep liquor away from schools early childhood centres and kindergartens, churches sports facilities and community centres or halls.



8 comments
Solution, crack down on drunks
Posted on 01-03-2013 17:16 | By Phailed
Most people drink alcohol responsibly. Instead of attacking them by restricting the number of shops (thereby increasing the price due to lack of competition), just clamp down on alcohol abusers. I'm sick of having my freedoms curbed because of idiots.
We have enough choice already thanks
Posted on 01-03-2013 22:00 | By Steve Morris
We have 7 off-licence outlets within a 400m radius in Domain Rd in Papamoa; they seem to be the only shops profitable at the moment, even though they have to price very competitively.
The figures are a joke.
Posted on 02-03-2013 00:08 | By Pooks
Phalled. A well thought out and sensible response. Hopefully many other people will see your views. I have not been aware of this "Feedback" or even the "survey" that has been conducted. Hopefully it wasn't geared entirely towards the church-going folks and the rest of us might have a say. Like Phalled says, no matter how many liquor outlets are out there, people are using them. If they weren't making profit then they wouldn't exist. So if Te Puke is 85% against more liquor outlets then only 15% is keeping the existing outlets going??? Nonsense figures in a nonsense survey. Well done to the author of this article for not quitting their job whilst doing so.
Meeting drinkees after, wonder what is on the list and what is consumed?
Posted on 02-03-2013 01:09 | By Crash test dummies
Now there is a good question?
Important principles here Steve
Posted on 02-03-2013 10:51 | By Phailed
I don't approve of alcohol abuse but I think it's important not to blame things that don't cause it. Whether there were 2 or as you say 7 outlets within 400m at Domain Rd doesn't affect consumption. Individual choice does. Simply restricting the number of shops would be as illogical as for example restricting the number of churches because of the possibility that some just might contain child abusers. The solution in all cases is to crack down on the actual offenders, not everything else.
$500
Posted on 02-03-2013 14:59 | By Captain Sensible
I also agree with Phailed. $500 mandatory fine for being drunk & disorderly in a public place....the $500 must be paid before let out of the cell. That way, those of us who are responsible will not suffer because of the idiots that are trying to ruin it for everyone.
Drinking.
Posted on 02-03-2013 15:56 | By donmac
It used to be a crime to be found drunk in a public place. Whoever changed that law surely blew it!
couldnt organise a bonk in a brothel
Posted on 05-03-2013 17:35 | By The Tomahawk Kid
I agree with Phailed: The law is not being upheld. There is no line in the sand that distinguishes acceptable behaviour, and so people keep pushing the levels of unruly behaviour until they find where it is. Keep letting people push the boundaries without consequences, and they will seek more unruly and obnoxious behaviour until they encounter it. Police need to have a campaign and make a press release informing the public where the line is, AND THEN ENFORCE IT. I cant understand the proprietors of the bars not getting together and making some unified decisions concerning THEIR livelihood - Instead they are waiting for the busyboddies to make the decisions for them. No doubt we will hear them all squeal very shortly when they are TOLD by council how to run THEIR business (and we all know council couldn't organise a bonk in a brothel)
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.