A call for city councils to join the Ministry of Education in suing building supply company James Hardie over leaky buildings has the guarded support of Tauranga Mayor Stuart Crosby.
Building materials company James Hardie is being sued by the Crown for leaky building issues at thousands of schools – including two Papamoa Schools Te Akau Ki Papamoa School and Tahatai Coast School where the city mayor is on the establishment board of trustees.
Tahatai Coast school is one of the schools suffering leak damage.
James Hardie supplies fibre cement products used in the exterior and interior of buildings from exterior cladding and internal lining, bracing and decorative finishes.
Acting education secretary Peter Hughes says the Ministry has lodged a High Court claim against James Hardie and others over $1.5billion in repairs for leaky school buildings.
The ministry faces a repair programme covering more than 800 buildings at 309 schools.
Independent MP Brendan Horan says the Government should encourage city and district councils to join the Ministry of Education 'leaky buildings” lawsuit against James Hardie.
'Councils and ratepayers have also taken huge financial losses for the repair or rebuild of leaky homes featuring James Hardie's alleged defective products,” says Brendan.
'Being able to join the lawsuit would provide a cost-effective and responsible way to recoup some of the costs.
'Why should taxpayers and ratepayers continue to carry the cost for problems caused by companies and developers who exploited deregulation? I'm sure that many of the councils would take up the opportunity to join the lawsuit.”
Stuart says it is worth considering but the council would need to take legal advice and weigh up the costs against the possible outcomes.
Both ratepayers and the council are carrying some of the risk attached to the leaky homes through the government's leaky homes payment scheme, which will see the council paying out in part to successful applicants.
'I'm certainly familiar with the frustration and cost attached to ultimately the taxpayer through the education buildings,” says Stuart.
'Tahatai Coast school was clad in their main product, or part of their product - the board part. Then there was a texture coating put on top of it.”
A number of other Western Bay of Plenty schools have also suffered leaky buildings damage including Otumoetai Intermediate and Primary, Tauranga Girls' College, Te Puke High School, Mount Maunganui College, Tauranga Boys' College and Selwyn Ridge School.



8 comments
Why not sue the Government?
Posted on 19-04-2013 17:21 | By Phailed
Or whoever allowed non-treated timber, and private building inspection companies?
Architects
Posted on 19-04-2013 19:18 | By Accountable
The architects need to be held responsible as well.They have designed the buildings that have leaked and so far they have wormed their way out of it.If you look at the building process the architect is the the first in line and everybody has to follow his instructions or you are quickly told you are no longer required if you dare question their knowledge.It's unbelievable that the law hasn't started with this avenue of recourse first rather than placing the blame on the building trade in general.
Mayor
Posted on 19-04-2013 20:41 | By TERMITE
Hmmm well history does not look good when the Mayor gets to that chapter in the book, usual ends up as being somethign completely different to what was expected but well I guess that is just normal in them there parts ...
Homeowner
Posted on 20-04-2013 11:16 | By Wendy G
Councils are partly to be blame for allowing buildings in these materials without fully testing product. Council sign off the building.
Are NZ's too stupid to learn from others mistakes ??
Posted on 20-04-2013 14:49 | By xenasdad
.
Are NZ MPs too stupid to learn from other countries mistakes ?
Posted on 20-04-2013 15:09 | By xenasdad
Way back in the late 70s there was a lot of public information available on the problems of "leaky buildings" on an epic scale in Canada. I know this for a fact, as I was a project officer at Consumers Institute at the time, and many such public reports crossed my desk. DESPITE this KNOWN disaster, good old NZ still went ahead and did exactly the same thing, with the same totally predictable result. It seems we are about to do the same thing with Charter Schools, already tried and shown to be a disaster by other countries. Why are proven blunders overseas so often repeated in NZ despite the freely available evidence of failure??
Copout
Posted on 20-04-2013 22:17 | By Capt_Kaveman
Architects and the idiots that stamped then should be footing the bill its the design more than anything
Architects
Posted on 22-04-2013 10:05 | By YOGI
The design will not help anything, materials not suitable ar teh issue, they failed and were known to be unsuitable, Government approved the use of them so after that it was "legal" to use these cheap products.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.