The city's lack of public art policy will be up for discussion when Tauranga Art Gallery hosts a public art forum tonight.
At 5pm the gallery on Willow Street will host an evening to discuss public art around the city. It will include a visual presentation from Associate Professor Tyler – director of the Gus Fisher Gallery and curator of the University of Auckland's art collection.
A public art policy forum is being held at Tauranga Art Gallery tonight.
The forum comes as the first piece in the city council approved project for 15 Renaissance murals on city walls is put on hold.
Street artist Owen Dippie was due to start work on the mural of Michelangelo's Medici brothers on the city owned warehouse on Dive Crescent this month. However, recent discussions have led to issues over the appropriateness of a Renaissance piece at the waterfront location.
Tauranga is one of the only cities in New Zealand that does not have a city council public art policy to guide the direction of art works. It instead decides on a case by case basis.
Tauranga Art Gallery director Penny Jackson says there are incumbent dangers in not having a clear cut policy on public art.
'We need to think about how our city looks, and we want that look to evolve over time. With a well-structured policy you can have a measure of control over the city's look. Good public art invites interaction and excitement.”
Penny hopes the forum will drive a community consulted public art policy before council.
'A policy doesn't prescribe what the art will actually look like, but rather put in place the process.”
Ideally Penny would like to see a panel including urban planners, architects, iwi, gallery professionals and artists who use a set of criteria to select and manage long term projects.
'Geographically we are surrounded by the sea and our landscape is one of variety, so any public art has to work within that context. Diversity is about all kinds of art and all kinds of subject matter.”
Mayor Stuart Crosby personally supports a public art policy.
'There is currently an ad-hoc system. The danger in this is it can be every narrow and I think the public want more variety in public art.”
He says the recent issues over the Dive Crescent mural show the need for a policy.
'The issues would have been managed sooner with a policy.”
In 2010 TCC resolved not to develop a public art policy and the issue of public art has not been back before council since then, says Stuart.
He believes there is now enough momentum in the community to bring a policy back into council at the next policy and strategy submissions process in September.
'It (the forum) is definitely a good start.”
There are hopes city council will look towards a policy that ties into Western Bay of Plenty District Council's public art policy that aims to encourage artworks relevant to the site, celebrates the landscape and cultural identity of people and places around the district.
WBOPDC Mayor Ross Paterson says the policy, which has been in place since 2009, is due to be renewed in 2013/2014.
He says council will be looking to simplify it so it can meet the future needs of the district.
'Having this broad framework in place has been useful for Council and those interested in public art.”
Some examples of when the policy has been applied include the historical markers and Pou at Maketu and the sculpture in the Gerald Crapp Reserve in Omokoroa.



7 comments
Does someone have too much money and time?
Posted on 14-05-2013 10:54 | By Annalist
I thought the city was struggling financially and loaded with a huge debt. The first policy the gallery should consider is how to honour the one-off one million dollar promise made when the gallery was being planned? Somehow it now costs ratepayers about $800,000 every year.
Late notice of that?
Posted on 14-05-2013 17:58 | By Plonker
Looks to be a typical pre approved list of attendees that arrive and get to talk to the faithful on this one, little chance of any new, revitalised, fresh thoughts here. Just the same old talking to the same old ... about what they 'want to hear'.
Plonker
Posted on 14-05-2013 21:44 | By DRich
It was a public forum - free admission, even, and was all about revitalised fresh thoughts - noses put out of joint and everything. It did involve get off the sofa, though, so not everybody's cup of tea.
You had to know it was on?
Posted on 15-05-2013 19:10 | By Plonker
So the faithful only get to go and chin wag a bit. Anyway of course it is free, the ratepayer is picking up the tab for all the bills for everything. The lot there were all about someone "else" has to pay so as "we" can have what "we" want ... like what has changed on this from the usual array of handout seekers that run around the corridors of TCC and it raft of adhoc agencies attached at the hip, looks more like a case of safety in numbers for the trough feeders.
GOT IT ONE DUMBO
Posted on 17-05-2013 08:16 | By ROCCO
Another waste of time and space and need we say it a waste of money too. This is night follows day territory.Why don't we look at pavement painting on the roads while we are at it hey ?
Poor Plonker
Posted on 18-05-2013 11:58 | By DRich
Plonks, I'm sorry u weren't informed of the forum: somehow I picked the news up online and marked it in my diary 2 12 weeks prior. Maybe you could surf more widely to keep abreast of such notices. By ‘free' i did not count the obligatory koha - money which people seemed to find in their own pockets, funnily enough. For someone who wasn't there, and does not know the actual make-up of the audience, you speak with remarkable surety, but naturally you must make certain assumptions to keep grinding that axe against yet another ‘boogey man'. The night was not about money, or handout seekers, or trough feeders, as the GM for Sunlive, in attendance, will attest. But don't let that stop you. I doubt that you would've attended, even out of morbid curiousity; if you had, would you have maintained your gutless anonymity and unfounded attacks? Would you have introduced youself as ‘Plonker'? To the various individual attendees I spoke with before and after, I introduced myself as Derrin Richards, as always.
Annalist?
Posted on 18-05-2013 12:02 | By DRich
Really? As an individual citizen who attended the forum of his own free will, I can assure you that I don't have too much time, but I exercise what little free time according to my own free will. If you read the article, even fleetingly, you should be able to pick up that the forum was about policy, not money for art, not council debt, and not about the art gallery (the venue), itself.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.