City urged to change tree rules

A former Tauranga City councillor is disputing a suggestion to remove and replace the city's silver birch trees, saying the committee responsible should be abolished.

The tree management subcommittee is requesting the city's tree management policy be amended to classify silver birches as an ‘inappropriate street tree' and recommends TCC actively removes and replaces them.


Silver birches along Ngahere Street in Cherrywood.

Silver birches make up 28 per cent of tree felling requests and petitions submitted to council and the subcommittee's proposal is aimed at reducing the issue.

There are 748 silver birch trees on Tauranga road verges and 146 in reserves, making up three per cent of the city's street trees. Removing them is estimated to cost $387,841.

Former councillor Mary Dillon says the request is 'a piece of ad-hockery” and the tree management subcommittee should be ended.

She says the subcommittee should not exist because it is a direct incursion into operational matters of the council.

'I've no idea why the tree subcommittee has even been set up. It should be abolished, it's completely and utterly inappropriate.”

Mary discovered the agenda item shortly before yesterday's meeting and was appalled at the lack of community consultation.

'The process they were going to use is purely focussed on people who have trees outside their property and not on anybody else. The trees on the streets do not belong to the people who have got them outside their properties - they belong to the entire community.

'If they want to do something like that, then as a first step before they do anything at all, they need to engage in some community consultation.”

A harsh critic of other subcommittee decisions, Mary suggests TCC review its Vegetation and Tree Management Policy.

The subcommittee is operating as a small unit out on its own, says Mary, and does so by ignoring the objectives and principles of the vegetation strategy, particularly where the policy is specific about preserving the city's mature trees.

'Maybe they read it, but they sure as hell don't apply it. My view is that the committee needs to be abolished.”

Mary also raised the issue of felled silver birches not being replaced – noting 13 trees removed when 15th Ave was widened, which were never replaced.

'What they should be doing is going back, looking at what's been going on over the last two or three years – notably the removal of a lot of trees – and saying to the community ‘We don't seem to have got this quite right, how can we do it better?'”

Following an overview of the policy, councillors should step out of the whole issue as it is an operational matter, says Mary.

She believes residents should still be able to talk to councillors about tree issues, but councillors should refer the issue to TCC staff to deal with.

'I think it's time a few of us said ‘enough is enough'. We need to respect our tree heritage. We actually need them in the city for our own health. They are what clean up all the fumes while you are sitting waiting for the change of the lights.”

After some debate councillors yesterday decided to review the tree policy, but will hold a workshop first to discuss all the issues raised.

8 comments

Give Mary All The Silver Birch Trees

Posted on 03-09-2013 11:07 | By tabatha

The only place for Silver Birch Trees is in rural areas away from houses. It is a native to Europe so it is like a lot of us an import. NZ has a great range of native trees and cultivating them should be encouraged and I am not just talking about the ones that grow very big. I do hope Mary has a lot of Silver Birch Trees on her section.


Quite contrary

Posted on 03-09-2013 13:38 | By verandric

Mary Dillion should check her dictionary. "Ad hoc" is not a pejorative for unwanted or ill-considered. It means especially for the purpose. I would that that is exactly what is required. What I would like to know is what is being suggested as the replacement for the silver birches, if the suggestion is pohutakawa then this would be even worse as they drop tons of leaves and also flowers that stain paintwork.


Totally agree with Mary

Posted on 03-09-2013 14:30 | By Fonzie

Chopping down trees because of a few leaves or someones view has gone too far Trees take many years to grow and enhance the city and should be removed only when absolutely necessary not on someones whim


The Real World

Posted on 03-09-2013 17:30 | By jackb

Icompletely agree with Ms Dillon. Just as long as she will personally come along and clean the vast quantities of seeds and leaves from inside and outside our property EVERY year. That includes all the gutters, downpipes, aluminium window gutters -floors, carpets - the lot?


@tabitha

Posted on 03-09-2013 17:50 | By Sambo Returns

and the only place for Pohutukawas is at the tip, or the beach, these trees have been planted to appease some, but a lot end up being trouble, so who is going to set the criteria, that says you are a good tree you can stay, or you are a bad tree, and are for the chop, or shall we just hug them to death, like the pines on the Mount base track, why are they able to be chopped down, and not the Pohutakawas in 2nd avenue?, there are trees being planted all the time, a lot more I am sure than what are being cut down!!!.


Check your dictionary

Posted on 03-09-2013 18:42 | By waxing

Quite contrary: "Ad hoc" means exactly what Mary Dillon is talking about - the problems of making individual decisions contrary to an agreed policy. What is the point of having a policy if then you consider decisions on trees on an individual basis? What is more operational than doing that? And if you don't like silver birchs or pohutakawas then make submissions on the policy to have it changed. There is no need for a tree subcommittee except to satisfy the whims of those who like and accept the policy up until it inconveniences them.


There's something about Mary

Posted on 03-09-2013 19:14 | By tibs

I stand to be corrected but I seem to remember that that a former city arborist decreed that all Silver Birch trees were to be removed and I'd have put that down as being when Mary D was still on council. This was the arborist they got rid of and sort of put on "gardening leave" too write a report for the future of trees and things in Tauranga, before he departed for Christchurch. Perhaps Mary's most memorable contribution to Tauranga is the Pink Dress she wore when she met Princess Di, that she has donated to the city for us all to contribute towards it's storage among Tauranga artefacts in the museum storage facility we need so vitally. $500,000+ per annum and no doubt rising with 7? staff. Possibly a million a year by now.


.

Posted on 04-09-2013 12:31 | By maccachic

Why did people buy houses with trees near them if they don't like them??


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.