Changes are in the wind for our sister-city relationships, says Tauranga Mayor Stuart Crosby.
Hitachi Mayor Yoshinari with Tauranga City Council Mayor Stuart Crosby. Photo: file.
He made the statement during this week's report to council on April's sister-city trip, the biennial jaunt by a delegation of local business and political interests to Japan and China.
'I think it is time for a review,” says Stuart, who has recently returned from the trip to the cities of Hitachi in Japan and Yantai in China.
The focus of the two-week journey was on strengthening business education and tourism links with the cities, as well as looking at opportunities for closer economic engagement with Ansan in South Korea.
The relationships have endured for more than 20 years, mainly because early on the parties agreed to try to maintain a strong business and trade focus.
From Tauranga's perspective, the commercial advantages for the region justify the travel cost. This year's trip cost ratepayers $14,064 for the mayor's airfares, some accommodation costs and gifts on behalf of the city.
Councillor Matt Cowley paid his own way, as did the rest of the delegates.
The returns far outweigh the cost of the Mayor's ticket, says Export NZ Bay of Plenty executive officer and trip leader Angela Wallace.
The returns from just one container of wine, or the arrival of another exchange student, will cover the city's investment. As well as export sales, the delegation has returned with offers of access for BOP products to a 36-store supermarket chain in China's Shandong Province.
'We decided as part of the 10-year plan to review the whole sister city/international relations [as] it hasn't been reviewed for about eight years,” says Stuart.
The review will include making sure the future investment is appropriate. Part of the funding is via a targeted rate to Export NZ and some of it comes from the general rate.
The other issue is that over the period of a year, Tauranga City Council will receive about half a dozen delegations, generally from Asia, and the city needs to discuss how to manage them for the benefit of the city.
'My personal view is we don't need any more sister cities, but we do need a mechanism to consider the opportunities as these delegations come through,” says Stuart.
A good example is the Ansan delegation that came through about 14 months ago, he says. They are not going to be a sister city but they are going to create an economic opportunities for our city.
'How, moving forward, are we going to manage those?”
Another element that will be discussed, likely with Priority One, is how the city investigates international investment, people coming in wanting to invest in local businesses or real estate.



5 comments
I smell BS
Posted on 25-05-2014 13:52 | By jed
If that were the case then why don't we make every city in the world a sister city? If the returns are higher than the cost!! Of course, everyone knows that is rubbish and an excuse for having free holidays for the mayor.
Commercial Responsibility
Posted on 25-05-2014 14:23 | By Watchdog
Thank you Matt Cowley and other delegates for paying your own way. I am always interested in opportunities to develop Trade, etc, but believe that costs for this should not be paid for by Ratepayers whose sole need is to have services provided for their properties and who are not paying Rates for commercial opportunites. Funding should always come from the industries who benefit. They in turn should be paying for any fares incurred by the Mayor and other delegates. If any benefits did come back then it should be to them instead, with no costs incurred by ratepayers.
Sister City Really !!
Posted on 25-05-2014 14:23 | By kb
Ratepayers shouldn't fit the bill ,let the wine exporter pay for it then ,councils way of justifying a ratepayer funded holiday, what a croc
Indeed
Posted on 26-05-2014 08:23 | By nerak
ratepayers should not be forking out for these junkets. Guess there is comfort that current mayor's trip will be the last at our expense, or will it... I'm sure the over riding desire of ratepayers going forward will be far less of these ratepayer funded jaunts.
@Jed's Idea Great but as he said???
Posted on 26-05-2014 17:28 | By tabatha
Sister city sounds great but I really doubt how much an elected person can increase trade. They may lead the group but it is up to the business person to sell their product. Personally our TCC is not in the position to spend money on just anything, we need to consolidate our spending and reminding the John Robsons of TCC you are not dealing with a business with a small board who is not really answerable to shareholders who want a dividend but to Ratepayers who want to see something really tangible for their dollar. In losing Ken Patterson we saw the end of pegging back as the previous CEO seemed to be a spender and the new one the same. Time for real pruning in the employment field. Forget about the mates.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.