Sitting on the dock of the Bay

As Tauranga awaits the outcome of a feasibility study looking to bring the 75 metre Waka Maori to the city's waterfront, SunLive looks into the history of the controversial pavilion.

The Waka Maori pictured in Auckland, 2011. Photo: Fairfax.

Divided opinions have arisen locally since Tauranga City Mayor Stuart Crosby confirmed on Tuesday discussions among various organisations are underway.

But the pavilion is no stranger to debate.

Dubbed the ‘Tupperwaka', the Waka Maori is one of the most successful initiatives to come out of New Zealand's 2011 Rugby World Cup promotion.

Yet in spite of two successful gigs, the second in San Francisco for the 2013 America's Cup campaign, it remains one of the most controversial.

Politics surrounded the waka from day one, says Darrell Carlin, director of the Tauranga public relations company, Carlin Valenti, involved in the project from the early stages ahead of the RWC.

'The reason Ngati Whatua o Orakei got involved in the putting together of the project was that it was asked to by then Minister of Maori Affairs, Pita Sharples, who was concerned there was nothing of Maori culture for visitors to Auckland to see,” says Darrell.

'Waka Maori was the idea that everyone felt was most likely to be a success. It was a success. Surveys of visitors leaving New Zealand after the Rugby World Cup rated it as the top event they visited.”

The pavilion was originally going to be open for 16 days, but that was shorted by a lack of funding to 10 days.

Funding was provided by the Ministry of Culture and Heritage, Te Puni Kokori, the Prime Minister's Department and Ngati Whatua Oraki.

The total cost was $1.8 million, of which $900,000 was the cost of the waka and $900,000 was the cost of the performers and running pavilion events, he says.

Ngati Whatua put up $100,000 cash but also funded the set up, and staffed the event with guides and security.

Auckland-based company, Structurflex, built the pavilion's tensile membrane structure. Beca and Opus were later called to be involved in the process, adding to funding costs and reducing opening time.

It is designed it to withstand a hurricane, and attracted a lot of international media attention during RWC coverage.

'Our team was busy guiding media teams through,” says Darrell. 'A full feature on the waka was carried on French television in the build up to the Cup final.

'There were 400,000 people through in 10 days. At times we had to restrict the flow of people coming in, as the numbers surpassed the estimates we had made.”

Shows rolled continuously throughout the day and the Waka Maori opened as a bar in the evening with entertainment and big screen TVs so people could watch the games.

At the front of the pavillion is a built-in theatre that seats up to 30 people.

During the RWC the theatre showed a 3D movie made by Taylormade: the group responsible for the America's Cup visuals.

The Waka also had a display of the history of the Maori All Blacks which people really enjoyed, says Darrell.

'That display was manned by current and former Maori All Blacks who were around to talk to rugby enthusiasts from Wales, Ireland, South Africa and the rest,” says Darrell.

'What was very special was the waka was the only place kids could go to get autographs.”

The waka was designed to include a kitchen and eating areas outside so people could wander in look at the displays, take in a concert, watch a movie, and get a coffee and something to eat.

While international media loved the Waka Maori, New Zealand media was not so kind.

'It started badly when the project got caught up in a political contest for the Auckland Maori seat where Labour's Shane Jones was facing off against Pita Sharples,” says Darrell.

'Shane Jones attacked the waka as a waste of money. He coined the term ‘Plastic Waka' and later ‘Tuppawaka'.

'We were fine with both names as it meant everyone had heard of it.”

Ngati Whatua were also drawn into the media wrangle via another issue.

'In the end it mattered little as the surveys showed it was a success,” says Darrell.

Ngati Whatua originally had no intention of owning the waka, says Darrell.

Two containers of the tensile membrane structured pavilion are currently dockside in San Francisco, awaiting the outcome of the Tauranga study.

Project initiator Sally Cooke says the Waka Maori on the Tauranga Waterfront proposal is a concept to bring the Waka Maori to Tauranga to be established as a cultural, technology and innovation showcase centre for the Bay.

11 comments

Citrus

Posted on 07-09-2014 11:19 | By penguin

The article above simply reinforces that the Tupperware waka is a lemon and we should have nothing to do with it. The reality is that it has no place here. It will never be anything more than a white elephantine eyesore which will completely ruin the maritime environment!


the waka

Posted on 07-09-2014 11:21 | By surfsup

maybe the council could look at using the waka to house the new university and kill two birds with one stone


@Sally Cooke

Posted on 07-09-2014 14:05 | By Sambo Returns

good PR spin, but "balderdash"!!!!!!, the money would be better spent on doing something with what we have...., improve the Redoubt, bring Taurangas history alive by bringing the Historic Village to the Strand, making the Waka in place now appealing and visual, so much more can be done, rather than having a lump of bloody plastic obscuring water views, who is stroking who over this inane idea?.


NO !!!

Posted on 07-09-2014 16:24 | By sambro

DON'T DO IT! A total waste of money and a complete eyesore. Why do you think the jafa's are trying to pawn this off on us. Because they are trying to recoup some money from one of their designers "creative" mistake. Don't let it be ours. We have beautiful waka's here to admire.


Blind to what we already have.

Posted on 07-09-2014 19:04 | By dgk

We already have a waka on the Strand. Are TCC blind?


Surely not

Posted on 08-09-2014 07:06 | By nzsister

I cannot believe that the Council are actually considering this option. If it actually looked culturally accurate, instead of just the shape of a floating vessel, then perhaps - but a white thing blocking the view. Don't be stupid.


DON'T DO IT!!!

Posted on 08-09-2014 07:40 | By Mary Faith

Surely the Mayor and councillors will not be stupid enough to go ahead with this preposterous idea! They must be aware of the overwhelming opposition to the plan! We will know who not to vote for next election if this THING ends up on our door step!


Easy guys

Posted on 08-09-2014 08:06 | By jamiel

A shame to see only negative responses here. The article does not describe the cost associated so how can we form an opinion on the 'waste' without knowing all the details? Hundreds of bus loads of cruise ship passengers disembark their ship at the Mount and head straight to Rotorua without a penny dropping in Tauranga and if this is another way to attract more dollars into our local economy (using someone elses hand me downs or otherwise) then I am all for it. Has anyone seen how timid the waterfront is in our beautiful city or are you all 100% okay with the fact our best waterfront CBD land is used as a bloody carpark!?


Nice one Stu!

Posted on 08-09-2014 11:26 | By Rangi

I was in the Waka on the night we took the world cup. It was fantastic! It's a great facility. The obstruction to views is less than the buildings which used to occupy the space. Our mayor is doing the homework on this, we should see what comes of the business case before rushing to judgment. Good ol $10 Tauranga...


Great Idea

Posted on 08-09-2014 12:27 | By robt1946

Lets put it on the strand and be sure to locate it to obscure the view of that horrible harbour. To cap it off we could ship in a container of plastic tikis from Taiwan to sell at the door. On the other hand we could consider doing something that is both useful and attractive like a lesser version of the London Eye.


@Rangi&jamiel

Posted on 08-09-2014 13:49 | By Sambo Returns

I was also there World Cup time, and have a totally different opinion, and all the monetary figures being bandied about where from a "World" event when the city was rocking, we on the other hand are looking at having a "plastic canoe" on our waterfront for years, how is that going to be sustainable and profitable?, as I said on my previous posting, there are other options to display this cities heritage from its inception, and have all cultural backgrounds contribute, why have something "plastic" blocking our waterfront?, when real timber stuff is available.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.