Smart speed cameras could be in use within months

At present there are 142 safety cameras across the road network, an increase of 30 since 2019. File photo Photo: RNZ / Alexander Robertson.

Speed cameras that take two pictures at different spots in order to work out a vehicle's average speed could be in use within months.

Transport Agency documents say law changes could allow them to be used against more offences including tailgating, and seeing inside a car to spot drivers using cellphones or not belted in.

The OIA papers show Waka Kotahi has been working on this and a new highway tolling system that can also be used for congestion charging, for a couple of years.

Its plans say the point-to-point or average-speed cameras "could be a game changer enabling us to manage corridor speeds rather than spot speed".

They would be three times better than fixed or mobile speed cameras at cutting the road toll, a business case said.

The smart cameras "can be used to provide evidence, for example, that a driver is using a mobile phone or not wearing a seatbelt.

"Camera-based enforcement can be invasive, as images are purposely taken of the driver and passenger compartment," the business case stated.

A board paper from April said law changes under the Regulatory Stewardship Transport Amendment Bill meant from early 2023 there could be use of point-to-point cameras, automation of offence processing and fine notices delivered to cellphones.

Already 26 of the new cameras are on order to add to the 142-strong network.

The agency is calling them "safety cameras" in a Cabinet-ordered attempt "to shift the public away from perceptions that safety cameras are an enforcement, revenue-gathering tool".

Medium and high-risk roads will be the target.

A camera business case estimates they could save between 1500 and 2400 lives and $1.5 billion across two decades.

The privacy implications are still being worked out with the Privacy Commissioner.

Waka Kotahi refuses to specify the total cost of the camera system and new tolling system, saying this was to protect "ministers, members of organisations, officers, and employees from improper pressure or harassment".

However, just the first phase - choosing the mix of cameras, where to put them and the design of the system - costs $21.6m, which is $10m more than expected, though the documents said that had not impacted the whole budget.

Spanish traffic company SICE (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones Eléctricas) won the contract for the cameras and tolling.

The work is being done quickly alongside a review of road offence penalties with the aim of saving 114 lives a year by 2030.

As it stands, relatively few cameras per capita and lack of advanced cameras, along with very low penalties for speeding "greatly undermine the effectiveness of the enforcement approach", the papers say.

In New Zealand the speeding fine for being 1-10km/h over the limit in an urban area is $30, compared to $370 in Sweden.

Fines are set to rise and demerit points are very likely to be stiffer, and applied for the first time to camera offences.

Authorities see all this as crucial to the Road to Zero strategy, with cameras expected to provide 5 percent of the 40 percent reduction in road deaths and serious injuries that is the strategy's primary goal.

At present there are 142 safety cameras across its road network: 45 red-light, 54 fixed speed, and 43 mobile cameras, an increase of 30 since 2019.

Waka Kotahi is taking them over from police, adding to its 2000 traffic management cameras.

It would not say how many cameras it planned to have.

"ITS and infrastructure will be future-proofed to enable Waka Kotahi to trial and adopt ... smart cameras" with "built-in intelligent image processing and pattern recognition algorithms [that] allow these cameras to detect motion, measure objects, read vehicle number plates, and recognise human behaviours", the camera business case says.

Police were already testing prototypes of trailers to carry point-to-point speed cameras that might be used at roadworks.

The aim with the network of three types of camera - point-to-point, red light, and standard used in both fixed and mobile operations - is to create an "anywhere, any time" deterrent.

Research shows the public thinks speeding is much safer than it is: 44 percent of all road deaths in the last decade were down to speed.

Privacy implications

On privacy, the business case says "the data and digital images captured by cameras, their storage, and their use all have privacy implications".

"New issues will arise with new technologies that can be used for other than current safety-related purposes, such as average speed and mobile phone use detection."

The agency expects a small rise in public support for cameras of up to 2.5 percent as people see the safety benefits.

On the tolling front, the documents show the current system used on just three highways is on its last legs.

"As it is now, the current tolling system is a very inefficient way of collecting money," the business case said.

One option was to run it to standstill, or outsource it entirely.

The is an indication there will be more tolling: "Over time, it should be expected that the cost of an outsourced service will increase as more roads are tolled."

Waka Kotahi has chosen Spanish company SICE to provide and run all the back office systems.

The business case does not mention congestion charging but the board paper says the upgrade is aimed at "upcoming toll roads as well as to support new capability that may be required, e.g. congestion charging."

-RNZ/Phil Pennington.

8 comments

Speed cameras

Posted on 17-08-2022 16:19 | By davidt5

Will they also be able to capture unregistered and unwarranted vehicles? Probably many more of these on our roads than people using phones. I suspect that many of the people in these 2 catagories are the same people.


Okay then....

Posted on 17-08-2022 16:24 | By The Professor

If these are safety cameras and not speed cameras or speed traps, presumably they will be well signposted as they are in the UK and other countries? Presumably as they are safety cameras they will also be used to fine drivers who are driving too slow e.g 20 below the posted limit, which of course introduces a safety risk due to other drivers having to take unnecessary risks by overtaking.


More accidents?

Posted on 17-08-2022 16:32 | By The Professor

The revenue gathering tools could in fact cause more accidents depending on the attitude of a nation. If I drove past one of these cameras above the speed limit, later realising, I would slow right down (braking for no reason) to get my average speed right down. More nose to tails coming.


Hmmm

Posted on 17-08-2022 17:16 | By Let's get real

Just lazy enforcement. If you have to increase your speed to safely overtake Nanna on a Sunday drive, an officer should be able to use their discretion as to mitigating circumstances. A camera is a dumb instrument that only sees actions in Black and White terms. Enforcement by an officer halts poor decision making and hazardous activities instantly. A camera will not stop actions, only report on them at a later date. So how will that help on the ridiculous "road to zero"...?


Smart cameras?

Posted on 17-08-2022 23:11 | By morepork

Great. Now all we need is smart drivers...


I predict...

Posted on 17-08-2022 23:16 | By morepork

... an increase in vehicles with tinted windows. People who can't afford that will fit venetian blinds or shutters... :-) There will also be an increase in camera detectors. As soon as you detect a camera brake hard and hope your average will drop to something more appropriate, before you reach the second one. OR, just drive sensibly and not worry about any of it...


Great

Posted on 18-08-2022 16:29 | By Kancho

I'm hopeful that in city speeding gets sorted as it seems some roads never have any enforcement. Pyes Pa road for starters. Better driving would be great and if cameras do the job thats good. For those complaining just drive better and more patiently or pay the fines and shut up.


@Let's get real

Posted on 20-08-2022 13:43 | By morepork

Your point about "lazy enforcement" got me thinking... We are entering an age of technology where computers can do the thinking and drones and robots can do the enforcement. You could remove Police from traffic duties altogether... It is only a matter of time before drones are patrolling the highways taking pictures of traffic offenses and mailing fines to the offenders. "Oh, brave new world, that has such people in it!" (Miranda failed her driving test... something about conditions being too stormy....)


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.