A report published by the Education Review Office today shows behaviour in New Zealand classrooms is among the worst in the OECD and action is needed, Minister of Education Erica Stanford says.
“The coalition Government is taking action to turn around deteriorating behaviour in schools and lift achievement.
“Improving student behaviour is critical to lifting achievement and ensuring every student receives a world-class education," says Stanford.
“Having a world class education system is important for children and their futures and is essential for long-term economic growth.
“The Government is already actioning two of the recommendations suggested by ERO to improve student behaviour – banning cell phones in classrooms and looking how it improve teacher training.”
The report noted that 51 per cent of teachers said device use reduced the ability to concentrate and may be one of the causes of worsening behaviour.
“We want students to focus on learning and achieving and getting rid of cell phones in classrooms is one of the best ways to do this," says Stanford.
“Today’s report tells an important story of what is happening in schools and importantly it tells us some of the changes we have introduced will work.
“One of the recommendations I am particularly interested in is the need for a national approach to behaviour in schools to prevent, notice, and respond to challenging behaviours effectively.
“Making sure every child, no matter where they live in New Zealand, receives a world class education is a priority for this coalition Government and is a key component of our Better Public Services approach.”
In total the report makes 16 recommendations, including better training for teachers, a national approach to behaviour and having clear guidance for schools on having effective consequences for poor behaviour.
“I will be following up with the Ministry of Education on how we progress these at speed.”
4 comments
ANTI SMACKING
Posted on 29-03-2024 14:38 | By oceans
This is all happened since ANTI SMACKING was thrown out. Perhaps not all of it, but in my opinion, a lot of it.
@ oceans
Posted on 29-03-2024 19:00 | By Yadick
Absolutely agree with you and it's been a constant downhill (PC) ride from there.
Bring back lunchtime detentions, the cane, strapping, after-school detentions. I got it all, except the strap, and guess what, I lived and without counseling.
@oceans
Posted on 29-03-2024 19:30 | By morepork
I agree. It's a perfect example of trying to enforce something that should not be enforced. In an older, saner(?), world, neither parents nor teachers wanted to brutalize their children. But there was a generally recognized agreement that sometimes kids NEED a short, sharp, corrective, slap. I was schooled when "corporal punishment" was still in force, and I sometimes received a clip round the ear from my father. (Always deserved and a salutary lesson.) As a teacher, I was persuaded by tutors NOT to use the cane or strap, and I never did. But the "withdrawal of privileges" can be a WORSE (and unfairer) punishment. It's tough when the bus with the class is leaving for the day trip, and one poor kid has to stay behind because of some trivial offense, days ago. Both he and I would've preferred a short sharp, shock, administered at the time.
@ By Oceans
Posted on 30-03-2024 09:30 | By Thats Nice
You are 100% correct. Thanks a lot SB. No consequences for bad behavior and this is the result.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.