Call for Tauranga CBD rainbow crossing backed

Rainbow community advocate Gordy Lockhart, Labour list MP and former Minister of Education Jan Tinetti and comedian Ben Hurley tell Tauranga City Council why they believe it should install a rainbow crossing in the CBD. Photo / Alex Cairns.

Comedian Ben Hurley and Labour list MP Jan Tinetti have added their voices to the call for a rainbow crossing to be painted in Tauranga’s CBD, saying the artwork represents “so much more” than “lines on the ground”.

A rainbow pedestrian crossing signals inclusivity future generations could build upon, they say.

Tinetti and Hurley joined local Rainbow community advocate Gordy Lockhart in presenting a petition to Tauranga City Council calling for the crossing to be installed and featured as part of the city’s Te Manawataki o Te Papa civic precinct revamp.

Earlier this month, the Bay of Plenty Times revealed Lockhart had spent six years campaigning for the council to support a rainbow crossing and is now taking his fight public with a petition.

Gordy Lockhart, Ben Hurley and Jan Tinetti pictured after speaking at a council meeting in favour of establishing a rainbow crossing in Tauranga. Photo / Alex Cairns.

Pedestrian crossings depicting a rainbow flag can be found internationally and in New Zealand, including in Auckland, Gisborne, Wellington and New Plymouth.

The rainbow flag is a global symbol of LGBTI pride. In recent weeks, rainbow crossings in Gisborne and Auckland have been painted over with white paint, resulting in arrests and charges of alleged vandalism.

As of 10am Monday, the petition had 902 signatures.

Hurley, a familiar face on Kiwi TV from his work on shows such as 7Days snd who lives near Tauranga, told the council meeting humanity had progressed for the better since ancient times and a rainbow crossing could be a visual celebration of that.

“A rainbow pedestrian crossing can be a monument or testament of the age of inclusivity that future generations can build upon,” Hurley said.

“Yes, it’s lines on the ground – but it’s so much more than that. It carries a practical use and it can honour the present.”

Tinetti, who was Education Minister in the previous government, referred to her time as principal at Tauranga’s Merivale School and her dealings with a struggling young student.

That same student came to Tinetti recently, having grown into an adult and transitioned to a woman.

Tinetti said the former student recently came to her and thanked her for “seeing me [and] … having my back”.

Tinetti said Tauranga as a city could do likewise and “stand up strong” to see and support its Rainbow community.

“It’s not just something some people will call ‘woke’ or ‘virtue signalling’. This is something that can make a difference to a community,” she said.

After the meeting, Tinetti told the Bay of Plenty Times Tauranga should support the rainbow community “more than just once a year”.

Gisborne’s rainbow pedestrian crossing has been restored. Photo / File.

When we celebrate Pride Week, we recognise we support. We stand alongside our Rainbow community 100 per cent of the time, and that’s the city that I want to live in and be part of.

“And that’s what I think Tauranga can be.”

Tinetti said a rainbow crossing sent a “really strong signal” of acceptance and support, especially in a time of international culture wars targeting the community.

Asked what his response was to the suggestion the money could be better spent elsewhere, Lockhart told the Bay of Plenty Times “ultimately, we could always make that point”.

Karangahape Rd's Progress Pride Flag rainbow crossing, just outside St Kevin's Arcade. Photo / John Nottage.

“The idea that we are all wonderful human beings together and that we should celebrate our differences is something that is very, very important in society.”

In comments on the online petition, respondents gave reasons they believed a rainbow crossing should be established.

Stacey Hogg wrote: “Because it’s important for the city to show that we think the LGBT+ community belongs here in Tauranga.”

Sharon Wall wrote: “It’s important for representation within society, the more normalisation and acceptance through regular everyday things, the safer it can become to be true to yourself as part of the rainbow community.”

Former Bay of Plenty-based list MP Angie Warren-Clark wrote: “I want people to feel welcomed and included in our community. And those crossing [sic] look amazing too!”

Council staff would write report on the matter that was expected to be presented at the May 20 council meeting.

Previously asked by the Bay of Plenty Times why Tauranga did not have a rainbow crossing, the council said it would “consider all petitions thoroughly and in accordance with standing orders.

“However, rainbow pedestrian crossings have been explored before and not pursued. We are open to looking at other ways to celebrate diversity in our city and welcome any ideas.”

-Bay of Plenty Times.

13 comments

Spin the Grin

Posted on 30-04-2024 08:13 | By Considered

WHY can't Tauranga be different from the rest of the sheeple in this country - I'd suggest that as the city has now become renowned for the smiley face at the mount, why not do the same with ALL the similar types of small roundabouts City wide and set our own uniqueness from the rest.
Spread the cheer with no particular or specific agenda or symbolism except for creating a city full of smiles . . . as Forrest Gump said - "Have a nice day"


No brainer.

Posted on 30-04-2024 14:03 | By morepork

If we can put separate buttons on a crossing for bikes and people, we can certainly paint a crossing for gays... :-) Seriously, a rainbow crossing is not only a welcome splash of colour, it also indicates inclusion and recognition that we are a diverse community. I hope it happens.


Totally Agree 'Considered'.

Posted on 30-04-2024 16:17 | By Bruja

Fabulous idea!!! Well written!


That will bring the people back

Posted on 30-04-2024 16:40 | By dave4u

Be the most people ever downtown ahh but probably all the protesters nah stick with the smiley faces but even that might not work for the protesters cause they look like a sad bunch anyway.


Sure....

Posted on 30-04-2024 18:07 | By OG-2024

1 for the LGBT+ community, 1 each for the Maori/ Muslim/ Indian/ Filipino/ English/ Chinese/ Christian/ Homeless/ Autistic/ Blind/ Deaf/ differently able/ solo parents/ employed/ unemployed/ retired ALL these groups are a part of Tauranga as well. Why just highlight 1 portion of Tauranga and call it being inclusive while all the others are not afforded the same??
We have seen divisive actions around these rainbow crossings and different parts of society's attitudes to all they symbolise elsewhere - how much are we willing to keep paying both financially and as a community on top of the installation costs, to be seen as inclusive of ONE portion of Tauranga?
Surely right now with the "housing crisis/ mental health crisis/ cost of living crisis" we have better things to spend funding on??
the idea of expanding smiley faces does seem a more cheerful and spread out option.


@ morepork

Posted on 30-04-2024 20:55 | By Yadick

I agree it'd be a welcome splash of colour but they're not legal road markings. I have nothing whatsoever against LGBTQ+ but these are not official crossings. There is enough visually confusing road markings and signage everywhere without causing more confusion. I'd like to know where drivers stand legally if they mow someone down on one of these crossings.
Perhaps we need to look at some other recognition than painting the road, such as footpaths. Where do we draw the line on others wanting road markings?


No Thanks

Posted on 01-05-2024 06:04 | By Thats Nice

Why do we actually need a rainbow crossing? We are fully aware people have different sexual preferences etc and accept that but we don't need a rainbow crossing or anything else splattered everywhere and what has it actually got to do with a comedian for goodness sake?


@ OG-2024 +Considered

Posted on 01-05-2024 10:46 | By Yadick

Both of you make excellent comments. Totally agree however OG-2024 I feel discriminated as you left out a Russian crossing :-)
That's white and yellow, thanks for asking :-)


cool

Posted on 01-05-2024 11:44 | By Mein Fuhrer

a new burnout pad for all those beautiful noisy gas guzzling automobiles.


@Yadick

Posted on 01-05-2024 12:57 | By morepork

We can MAKE them "legal crossings" and they are less difficult to miss than a current white-painted legal crossing. The real issue here is not objection to paint on the road, it is objection to what community the crossings stand for. I find that sad. There are still some sections of the community who don't recognize the right of LGBTQ+ to live in the community, but they are forced to accept it because most of the community does. I'd suggest to those people that they see the crossings as simple art work. Ingrained beliefs will not be changed overnight, but they can be adapted to the reality of communal living. Eventually, bigotry and racism will be eradicated but it could be another 100 years... Drivers legal responsibility would be the same as any other crossing.


@ Yadick

Posted on 01-05-2024 14:45 | By Justin T.

Agreed! If there are pedestrian Traffic lights already installed somewhere by all means have a token rainbow pedestrian crossing. But... under no circumstances go blowing more ratepayers funds installing a set of pedestrian Traffic Lights at some ridiculous cost just to pander to the whimsical. We're in the midst of a cost-of-living-crisis with future annual rate rises expected to push double digits yet again!


@ Justin T

Posted on 02-05-2024 08:17 | By Yadick

Thank you for your comment Justin. You raised a question for me by it.
Are these crossings signal controlled or just controlled like a black and white crossing?
If signal controlled then I agree with your idea, if not signal controlled then I stand by my question of what happens (in the here and now) legally if someone is mowed down on one of these.
On the other hand I agree with OG-2024 as well.
Now I have brain strain . . . :-)


SACK THEM ALL

Posted on 17-09-2024 14:10 | By Keywee

The only way to stop councilors wasting ratepayers money is - to hold them accountable. It seems ALL Politicians think they can spend whatever on pet projects. LGBT members should also have to contribute of the setup cost and all of the ongoing maintenance. This spending is of no value to the vast majority of ratepayers. Those councilors who voted for it should have 90% the initial cost deducted from their gratuity payments. A few stripes on the road will not help the businesses (or lack of) in the city center.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.