Tauranga City Council Mayor Mahé Drysdale has moved to reassure ratepayers that concerns expressed by a number of parties relating to recent property transactions are being thoroughly considered.
“Questions have been raised about the sale of the Council-owned Marine Precinct and the purchase of 160-176 Devonport Road,” Drysdale said on Friday.
“Council elected members understand the community’s views and have since spoken to and continue to engage with multiple parties and stakeholders.”
Tauranga City Council sold the precinct at Sulphur Point for $13.987m to Christchurch developer Sam Rofe.
The 2.98-hectare precinct, also known as Vessel Works, was valued between $18.63m and $19.24m and is zoned for port industry. Some sites within the precinct are already privately owned.
Rofe approached the council in late 2023 with a proposal to buy the precinct with a vision of it becoming a “premier superyacht refit destination”.
The sale conditions meant most of the working boat operators would need to relocate from their precinct berths.
As part of the sale, the council also agreed to fund up to $29.2m to develop an alongside wharf and replace the existing Bridge Wharf.
The decision – made under the Government-appointed commission – has been criticised by precinct users and newly elected councillors.
Tauranga mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo: Alisha Evans
In a statement released last week, Drysale said they have investigated these transactions internally, gathered legal advice and continue to work with the Office of the Auditor-General.
“While no evidence has been found of personal wrongdoing, as elected members, we are supportive of independent scrutiny of significant property transactions and I have written to the Office of the Auditor-General to express full support for any review or investigation they might deem necessary, so that we can ensure that all proper processes, legislation and policies have been followed and that ratepayers’ best interests have been considered,” Drysdale said.
He said that while the Marine Precinct sale has yet to be formally settled, legal advice indicates that there is a binding agreement in place.
“While the recently elected Council may have made different decisions on both of these inherited transactions, we are committed to achieving the best possible results for all stakeholders and we will continue to work proactively with all parties involved in these matters,” Drysdale said.
3 comments
Hmmm
Posted on 18-11-2024 10:50 | By Let's get real
I'm not sure how protecting the ratepayers best interests results in accepting 14M for property valued at 19M and then agreeing to additional expenditure of 29M to seal the deal.
I'm not as well "informed" as many regarding council ineptitude, but I believe that there has been some extremely questionable backroom negotiating involving public funds in this instance.
Sleazy and corrupt transactions are the way business is done in many overseas nations, but New Zealand is not believed to be in any way associated with that activity.
Let's hope that the auditor general can confirm that New Zealanders at all levels of public administration are totally beyond reproach.
We all know that politics is about "gift" giving. You only need to look in parliamentary offices to see examples of overseas visits for our delegates.
Rightly So
Posted on 18-11-2024 11:16 | By Fernhill22
How can an asset valued at $19m be sold for $14m at a loss of $5m to ratepayers, who are then expected to pay a further $29m. And also, whilst putting local businesses out of business.
Honestly it beggars' belief that this can happen & yet no one will be held accountable for this.
Like Trump has done in America appointing Elon Musk to review efficiencies, we need someone to come in and to shake things up at TCC. Someone not afraid to challenge the status quo, to review & take action, stop the wastage of money, and deliver better outcomes for ratepayers.
Anne Tolley has a lot to answer for!
Posted on 18-11-2024 12:58 | By Omni
So much corruption.... I'm perplexed that these people who have no idea how to run any type of functioning business, continue to get jobs and then elect to keep themselves in a paid position without any knowlege of incomings and outgoing, along without any accountability for their self serving decisions they make (behind closed door) to the very people the are supposed to be advocating and working for.
No surprised, like most things where money is spent/lost for the ratepayers, I'm sure there was something (or lots of things) in it for those who got to do all the negotiations with selling something well under value whilst also committing their community to paying the bills for a whole bunch of upgrading work at the expense of the people who should have been making or at least had a say in these costly decisions. Bring on an enquiry!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.