Te Puna 'in shock' as industrial park greenlit

Priority Te Puna spokesperson Alison Cowley is against the industrial park on Te Puna Station Rd that was granted resource consent. Photos / John Borren, Alisha Evans

A rural Western Bay of Plenty community is “in shock” as a controversial local industrial park is greenlit.

Te Puna residents have been rallying against the development since 2021, as they say the culturally significant, flood-prone wetland is inappropriate for the business.

Resource consents were granted for the industrial park by an independent commission whose decision was released last week.

Te Puna Industrial Limited bought 12ha of industrial-zoned land at 297 Te Puna Station Rd for $4.7m in 2021 and applied for consents from the Western Bay of Plenty District and Bay of Plenty Regional councils in 2022.

The company is half-owned by shipping container company ContainerCo.

ContainerCo managing director Ken Harris said they planned to build “very low-intensity, specialised businesses” at Te Puna Business Park.

Plans included refrigeration engineering, workshop activities including container washing, and the company’s sales office.

The business park website said ContainerCo would hold a “small supply” of up to 300 containers at the site.

Priority Te Puna spokesperson Alison Cowley said the community was “in shock and very depressed” about the decision.

“People took the assumption that it was so ridiculous that it was never going to happen.”

Priority Te Puna spokesperson Alison Cowley. Photo / Alisha Evans
Priority Te Puna spokesperson Alison Cowley. Photo / Alisha Evans

There were safety concerns because of the increase in trucks and heavy vehicles on Te Puna Rd from the park, Cowley said.

“We feel that the impact on Te Puna Village and the Te Puna Rd corridor has not been in any way considered.”

Cowley said the consent conditions were “extremely stringent” so it was up to the council to ensure they were complied with.

Concerned locals formed the incorporated society, Priority Te Puna in 2022.

They were holding a public meeting about the consent approval on July 23 at 7pm at the Te Puna Memorial Hall.

Harris said there had been a “huge amount of misinformation” spread about the development, which was “disappointing”.

There were signs dotted around the settlement saying, “Container Terminal, Te Puna Says No” and “Wrong Business, Wrong Place, No Container Terminal”.

Signs are dotted around Te Puna opposing the industrial park on Te Puna Station Road. Photo / John Borren
Signs are dotted around Te Puna opposing the industrial park on Te Puna Station Road. Photo / John Borren

There was no intention to build a container terminal or a container park of any scale, he said.

“This is a facility that will fit into the community and be good for the region.”

The consent process was “very thorough and rigorous”, Harris said.

The traffic plans were “carefully considered” by experts and if people were concerned, they could call the company, he said.

“If traffic causes a problem people should talk to us and we will listen carefully and adjust plans as required.”

Once fully developed, the site would generate 774 vehicle movements per day, with a peak of 125 vehicles an hour, according to the commission’s decision report.

It also said Western Bay of Plenty District Council had committed to upgrading the Te Puna Station Rd/Te Puna Rd intersection, with works set to start in October and finish late January.

ContainerCo managing director Ken Harris. Photo / Supplied
ContainerCo managing director Ken Harris. Photo / Supplied

Harris said they would also be establishing community and mana whenua liaison groups.

The land is culturally significant to Pirirakau hapū, who occupied the Pukewhanake Pā at the headland of the Te Hakao valley, and the wetland was once an important food source for them.

The consents went through a lengthy process, including public submissions in 2023.

Of the 273 submissions 271 were opposed, one was neutral, and one did not clearly state a position.

At hearings in July 2024, 17 submitters addressed the independent commission of Fraser Campbell, James Whetu, and chair Rob van Voorthuysen.

Harris said work would begin at the site in October with landscaping and supporting infrastructure as well as wetland restoration.

A 5.24ha area will be developed first and 2.21ha in the future.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

6 comments

Wrong! Wrong! Wrong

Posted on 17-07-2025 07:29 | By Wigan

This is wrong on so many levels, 150 words wont even scratch the surface.
What is the point of submissions & consents when 0 submissions are in favour? And yet!
What experts were used to state a heavy container truck every 1.5 mins for 9 hours per day on a quiet rural road is OK?
Then what is OK about 774 additional trucks per day on an already overloaded network?
Wait-on, they didn't say it was ok, they just "considered" it...
Then obviously ignored those who would be affected.
So the council will spend $$'s to upgrade an intersection to let this happen but they won't spend to open a road blocked by a weather event!
Time to name shame the councilors that think all this is OK. Elections are coming.
Democracy... well & truly buried


Money Talks!

Posted on 17-07-2025 08:35 | By Equality

A clear case of 'Money Talks'
China is a part owner of ContainerCo (NZ) through its state-owned enterprise, China Ocean Shipping (Group) Co., also known as COSCO.
With such backing for their new depot how could council say NO. The unfortunate people who live in Te Puna have fought this outrageous idea for decades. Te Puna Road is running at full capacity in rush hours - imagine adding 774 vehicle (Container trucks) movements per day, with a peak of 125 vehicles an hour! A school within a distance of few metres, a township, not to mention the already dangerous intersections at Te Puna Station Road and Tepuna Road - and then Te Puna Road and the main Hightway!! Madness !!


It is surprising...

Posted on 17-07-2025 08:58 | By fair game

that in the NZ Companies website listing, the owners are locals. Although on the other side of the bridge...


Who's responsible?

Posted on 17-07-2025 12:18 | By Jaycee

If there is any blame to lay for this, doesn't it lie with Western Bay Council for zoning this land industrial? What were they thinking?

Posted by Outsider


Something fishy going on???

Posted on 17-07-2025 14:31 | By Ben Dover

This pathetic council are voted in by the public, to represent the public and act accordingly,yet they have totally gone against the 271 submissions made against this container terminal happening. You have got to ask the question WHY? There is no practical reason to locate the facility there so, being skeptical, I ask myself, has someone making that sort of decision benefited in some other way?


Watched this happen in kerepehi

Posted on 21-08-2025 14:06 | By StuffNZTA

Same thing will happen as what happened with kerepehi industrial park companys dont care about residents trucks engine braking and causing hassles with locals early hours and at night most of the trucking companys come from tauranga they wont and dont care we are zoned residential/industrial and cant do anything about it the roads are destroyed by the trucks and no repairs or maintance has been done in 10 plus years not to mention the amount of truck accidents we have had in recent years because of speeding we also have container and curtain sider trucks coming and going at all hours waking familys and causing trouble for locals with no care from the company owners ..who funny enough are based in tauranga area


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.