Act MP Cameron Luxton claims the Western Bay of Plenty District Council is campaigning on social media to keep its Māori ward.
The council chief executive says it is not campaigning for or against the ward, and has the electoral officer’s backing.
The council posted information on its Facebook and Instagram pages about the upcoming referendum on Māori wards, happening alongside the October council elections.
The August 15 posts had nine text slides with details about Māori wards, their history, and why the referendum was happening.
Luxton, Act’s local government spokesman, said in his view the slide titled ‘Why have Māori wards?’ was “taking a position”.
It gave two reasons:
- Guarantees Māori representation on councils.
- Support Māori participation in decision making.

The slide from the social media post that Act MP Cameron Luxton believes is "taking a position". Photo / Supplied
Tauranga-based Luxton told Local Democracy Reporting the council should not be using its channels to promote a position in an election.
“I’m concerned that there’s a lack of balance in their post.
“It’s fine to be informing, but if you’re going to inform, you have to make sure … you’re taking a precautionary approach and not going to one side or the other."
He said there should also be a slide covering arguments about “why not have Māori wards”.
“You don’t need to be taking a position for or against with ratepayers’ funds.”
Luxton said the council should remove the slide.
A “vast majority” of 78% were opposed to establishing a Māori ward for Western Bay in a 2018 poll held by the council, Luxton said.
He also shared his concerns about the council’s post in a comment on the Facebook post and on his page.
The Act Party and lobby group Hobson’s Pledge have also shared social media posts claiming the council is campaigning for Māori wards.
Last year the council reaffirmed its decision to have a Māori ward, which triggered a referendum on the decision.

The public gallery was full at the Western Bay of Plenty District Council meeting reaffirming Māori wards in 2024. Photo / Alisha Evans
The coalition Government directed councils to rescind Māori wards established after 2021 or hold a binding referendum on them at this year’s election.
The council first voted to establish a Māori ward in August 2023, having decided not to consult the community again.
In June, Hastings District Council removed social media videos of councillors talking about the benefits of Māori wards after it received a legal letter from lobby group Hobson’s Pledge.
Luxton wrote to the Office of Auditor-General about the videos and received a reply saying they would not be investigating as the videos were removed.
The response letter said the office had reminded councils about the importance of not using council resources for electioneering purposes, including relating to polls.
Luxton said the Western Bay council “should heed the advice of the Auditor-General and not even get involved in anything that could be seen to be a lack of balance”.
“It’s ratepayers’ money being used, so they need to be especially cautious.”
The Hastings’ case had set a “clear precedent”, so Luxton did not think there was “much value in dragging” Western Bay council to the Auditor-General.

Western Bay of Plenty District Council interim chief executive Miriam Taris. Photo / Supplied
Acting council chief executive Miriam Taris said they were aware of the comments about their social media posts.
“We want to be clear that council is not campaigning for or against Māori wards.”
The council’s electoral officer, Warwick Lampp, had reviewed the content and confirmed he was comfortable with the posts, and that they were factual, correctly setting out the referendum process and timeline, she said.
“He does not consider them to show council taking a particular stance.
“We’re not going to remove the post.”
The council had taken care to remain neutral in its election communications, Taris said.
The purpose of the posts was to provide factual information about the referendum process and local elections, she said.
This was to ensure people understood why the referendum was included with voting papers.
They also outlined key dates, milestones, and voting information so the community was well-informed, Taris said.
“We acknowledge there are differing views in the community, and council’s role is to provide clear, factual, and neutral information.
“We will continue to apply that same approach across all election-related communications.”

Western Bay of Plenty District Council electoral officer Warwick Lampp. Photo / Bevan Conley
Lampp confirmed he had reviewed the Facebook post.
“I do not believe that the slide ‘Why have Māori wards’ is campaigning, nor do I think that it is promoting a position.
“The two bullet points under that heading are facts.”
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.




9 comments
Hahaha....
Posted on 02-09-2025 08:09 | By groutby
...did we really think that the council's own electoral officer would say anything different than stated?...'WE'RE' not going to remove the post says it all...'we' presumably are the entrenched group within the council which has no consideration for for it's ratepayers, that is of course until rates setting time...and yes of course the posts are campaigning for compulsory Maori wards...the left just love compulsion....
Hmmm
Posted on 02-09-2025 09:31 | By Let's get real
Quality and qualified candidates get elected, whomever they might be. That is how a non-racist community works.
Preferential or separate groupings based on ethnicity is racism. Ergo, we are a racist community.
@Groutby
Posted on 02-09-2025 12:57 | By morepork
I consider myself to be centre Left. (Actions of MAGA and similar, leave me hollow inside.) But I disagree with your final sentence. The Left (at least as I see it) likes compulsion no more nor any less than anyone else (Right or Left).
If you believe in Democracy (I do, fervently...) then the only thing that is compulsory, is the will of the people.
It is clearly wrong for a Council to be supporting ANY position on ANYTHING, unless it has been mandated by a fair and honest vote.
The people who WANT continued Maori Wards should be campaigning for them, and the people who see them as no longer necessary, because modern Maori don't need different treatment from the rest of us, should be making their position clear.
Council should be making sure that BOTH sides get a fair hearing.
Their involvement simply politicizes the issue.
Council shows bias
Posted on 02-09-2025 15:30 | By spencerb
The council reps are at worst lying or at best delusional. Why haven't they also posted the arguments against Māori seats if they claim to be impartial?
Aghast again
Posted on 02-09-2025 15:39 | By Maxine Woodhall
How anyone could read the bullet points in any way other than as an endorsement of the need for Māori Wards is beyond comprehension, it’s as clear as the nose on a face!!
Why have Māori Wards
Posted on 02-09-2025 17:09 | By Leprechaun
Of course the slide is promoting the Māori wards. By giving reasons for them it is reminding and encouraging people (whoever they are) to vote for Māori Wards.
But for those who oppose.
It would be easy to add ‘Yeah Right’ on the end! But that would be probably seen as being racist.
In my opinion ACT MP Cameron Luxton is correct in taking his position.
Whilst interim CEO Miriam Taris and Council Electoral Officer Warwick Lampp appear to be endorsing it?
The Master
Posted on 02-09-2025 20:37 | By Ian Stevenson
Councils generally are completely besotted with separate seats based on the race of the candidate/s. There looks to be no justification, based on the facts and evidence but that does not stop any true council outfit holding desperately to the cause 24/7.
Council cant be involved in elections, the simple fact that postings have been made publicly is taking a stance, will be seen as tampering 24/7 to seek a desired end result.
Why do it? Unless the subject is pre-determined?
@ Let's get real
Posted on 03-09-2025 09:21 | By Yadick
Very well stated. 100% agree with you.
Referendum
Posted on 03-09-2025 17:02 | By Kancho
My understanding is this must go to referendum at the next TCC elections so democracy will decide as to whether a Maori ward is necessary. we shall see . Anyone can stand on merit
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.