Council’s cash status rated

Tauranga's new council's ability to significantly alter the council's financial position appears to be dashed by the latest Standard and Poors credit rating.

While Tauranga City Council has retained its A+/Stable/A-1 credit rating, the agency is warning the city's deteriorating financial performance could change that.

Tauranga's debt-servicing ratio has reduced to the point where the agency is warning the credit rating will be lowered should it drop much further.

The ratio was 105 per cent of the next 12 months' debt servicing in 2010, 88 per cent in 2011, and 50 per cent in 2012. If the ratio were to fall below 40 per cent, the ratings are likely to be lowered.

Tauranga's 'very high” debt burden also attracts comments in the report released this week. It weighs on the ratings but Standard and Poors expects Tauranga's total-tax supported debt to reduce to about 240 per cent of operating revenues by 2016, down from its peak of 270 per cent in 2012.

'Its debt remains very high compared to peers. In our assessment, Tauranga's debt burden significantly underperforms our benchmarks, as set out in our criteria. Further, Tauranga's interest expenses are very high and average about 16 per cent of operating revenues from 2013-2015.”

On the positive side the report states Tauranga's individual credit profile reflects the predictable and supportive institutional framework available to local and regional councils within New Zealand.

Standard and Poors regard the New Zealand local government system as promoting a strong management culture and fiscal discipline among New Zealand councils. This provides a source of credit strength for Tauranga, and allows it to support higher debt burdens than some of its international peers can tolerate.

Other positives for Tauranga are its financial management, high budgetary flexibility, and limited contingent liabilities, but Tauranga's moderate budgetary performance, high debt burden, and the agency's neutral view of its economy partially offset the strengths.

In spite of the qualifiers, Tauranga's outlook is stable. Standard and Poors expects Tauranga will continue to manage its financial position within the current metrics of a 'A+' rating for a New Zealand council, that correspond to S&Ps base-case forecasts of its budgetary performance and debt burden.

'We consider the likelihood that the rating will be changed in either direction over the next two years is low.”

Ratings could improve if Tauranga's debt burden reduces toward 200 per cent of operating revenues with a downward trajectory, and its debt-servicing ratio improves to more than 80 per cent of the next 12 months' debt and interest payments. In addition, if its capital programme were to reduce, resulting in average after-capital account deficits of less than 5 per cent of total operating revenues, upward momentum may occur.

Credit ratings could be lowered if there is a significant change in policy, such as bringing forward capital-expenditure projects resulting in average after-capital account deficits of more than 22 per cent of total revenues, and debt levels increasing above 290 per cent of operating revenues.

Further, the ratings could be lower if Tauranga's liquidity weakens with its free cash, liquid assets, and unutilised bank facilities falling to 40 per cent of the next 12 months' debt servicing.

Tauranga's budgetary flexibility is high. Tauranga's modifiable revenues account for about 95 per cent of its operating revenues after Standard & Poor's adjustments, and its capital expenditure is about 40 per cent of total expenditure over the next three years.

About 38 per cent of Tauranga's total expenditure is for capital expenditure for 2014-2016.

'We consider the council's ability to further reduce or defer capital expenditure over the next three years to be limited because its population is still expected to grow by 1-1.5 per cent per year,” says the report.

'In our view, Tauranga's limited ability to postpone capital expenditure over the next 2-3 years somewhat offsets this high starting position.”

Standard and Poors accountants expect Tauranga to consistently achieve strong operating surpluses of more than 20 per cent over the next three years.

Tauranga's average after-capital account deficits of 6.4 per cent from 2012-2016 offset these strong operating surpluses.

However, in 2013 Tauranga's after-capital account moved into surplus of about nine per cent in 2013 because a number of capital projects were delayed until 2014.

S&P have not included the NZ$45 million sale of the ASB Arena to Tauranga City Venues Ltd, considering it to be an asset transfer within the consolidated council. S&P expect Tauranga's after-capital account to average deficits of more than 10 per cent over the next three years. It is expected to remain less than in the past when it averaged more than 25 per cent between 2008 and 2011. Tauranga is reducing its capital-expenditure program by about 15 per cent compared to 2008-2011.

Tauranga's after-capital account performance depends on the lumpy nature of its capital-expenditure program, and the income from its developer contributions.

After-capital account balances have historically been weak due to large capital-expenditure programs and weaker-than-expected developer contributions. For example, between 2007 and 2011 Tauranga averaged significant after-capital account deficits of about 25 per cent after Standard & Poor's adjustments, when the council undertook investment in growth-related infrastructure and asset repairs in the wake of the 2005 floods

Tauranga's liquidity management is considered another negative ratings factor, in the view of S&P.

At June 30, 2013, the council's debt-servicing ratio of free cash, liquid assets, and unutilised bank facilities is relatively lower than peers, at 56 per cent of Tauranga's next 12 months' debt and interest repayments.

Tauranga has approximately $39.2 million in cash and short-term deposits, and an undrawn committed bank facility of $50 million available to cover commercial paper of $50 million, other debt maturities of $82 million, and interest of about $26.6 million.

Tauranga is managing its liquidity by maintaining committed bank facilities to cover its commercial paper program, setting aside $38 million in short-term deposits to help repay upcoming debt maturities, and plans to pre-fund its $50 million bond maturing in December 2013.

'We consider Tauranga's access to external liquidity to be satisfactory. New Zealand's capital markets are comparatively liquid, but, given its small size, are not considered by Standard & Poor's as being particularly deep.

'This was highlighted during the severe market dislocation in 2008 and 2009, during which some New Zealand councils had difficulty issuing unrated commercial paper.”

Tauranga's participation in the New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency is helping Tauranga to lengthen its debt-maturity profile, which may further improve the council's liquidity by extending the maturities of its borrowings, says S&P.

Standard & Poor's make some accounting adjustments to Tauranga finances so that international comparisons can be made.

The major adjustments relate to the exclusion of capital grants from both operating revenue and cash flow from operating activities. This adjustment is made because these grants generally are tied to specific capital projects and cannot be used to service debt if required. Developer contributions and vested assets are considered a key risk to fiscal outcomes being achieved, primarily because of uncertainty as to whether they are received as projected.

S&P have reduced our expectations of Tauranga's income from developer contributions because of volatility. The agency estimates Tauranga will receive about 70 per cent of its forecast developer contributions over the next three years.

8 comments

And now the Mayor's handbrake gone

Posted on 18-10-2013 16:35 | By Murray.Guy

The community have reason to be concerned despite Mayor Crosby's assurances pre-election that Tauranga City Council finances are in 'good shape' and well positioned to spring board the city into the future. Scary times ahead, reading between the lines, with a few 'big idea big spender' mindsets around the Council Chambers and the Mayor's handbrake not being re-elected. Credit rating down grade with less than complimentary accompanying notes, interest rates to rise and $120m of new debt on the horizon for stormwater and southern pipe line. Same man at the wheel, same crew and a few changes on the bridge - The committee structures, chairperson and Deputy Mayor appointments will immediately tell us if it is business as usual (patch protection) or a new and inclusive mindset.


Murray, be a good loser and give a chance

Posted on 19-10-2013 11:09 | By Councillorwatch

Cr or former Cr Guy seems to chuck around the term mindset a lot. I guess others have a mindset whereas he has an opinion? Cr Guy should also ask himself about spending that took place on his council on things such as a $5 million "loan" to Baypark. He could also think about how open-minded his council's processes were over things like annual plans where council gets to listen to the community. His council also had a big chance to restructure staff and various CEOs have been employed. Councillors also can't just push policy and process when it suits. Maybe the voters wanted thorough change, though doing nothing, bunny signs and something inexplicable may have saved a few. Face the fact that this election has seen 7 out of 10 councillors gone. Big change? Who in your mindset should be deputy-mayor? Give the new councillors a chance.


Handbrake

Posted on 19-10-2013 14:50 | By FunandGames

I believe ex Cr Guy is entitled to highlight how the Mayor refered to him as handbrake when that appears to be exactly what is required.And Councillorwatch it was not "His Council" Murry was only one in Stuart Crosby's council, and to reiterate a handbrake according to Stuart Crosby.


reply to FunandGames about Murray Guy

Posted on 19-10-2013 15:48 | By Councillorwatch

I'm not sure if Cr Guy was a "handbrake" on the previous council's spending? Did he vote for say $5 million loan to Baypark? or any payout/s during the council term? or the staff line at annual plan and spend on more things? Was he consistent with the policy and process he talked about? (never ask questions unless you already know the answer) The voters chose not to re-elect Cr Guy and 6 others. The mayor just scraped in. Now let the new councillors have some chance. Council decisions are by majority and the new ones have a majority. They can choose the deputy and committees and we can judge them on their performance. So far other councillors have been gracious in defeat. Then I read Murray Guy's comments about mindsets around the council. Perhaps it is he who has the mindset? The council has changed, get over it.


Handbrakes and things

Posted on 21-10-2013 11:30 | By YOGI BEAR

Ex Cr Guy was not a handbrake at all, that is obtuse to think or even say that. Although Team Crosby may not have liked the answer provided the end result is that Standard & Poors have noted very clearly that the numbers don't look good and are certainly a lot worse that Team Crosby were saying.


Debt is a worry

Posted on 21-10-2013 17:54 | By Annalist

I'm wondering how this level of debt relates to say the debt you get into when you get a mortgage to buy a house?


Annalist

Posted on 22-10-2013 09:17 | By YOGI BEAR

No, TCC debt is a lot worse, that is because TCC are borrowing it and then expecting someone else to pay it back, that means us the ratepayers.


I think the USA got downgraded

Posted on 23-10-2013 09:50 | By Annalist

But another big worry about debt is what happens when interest rates go up?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.