The introduction of a lower legal blood alcohol limit is being welcomed by a Tauranga Safe City coordinator who believes the new law will catch many unsuspecting drink drivers out.
The Government announced last night it has approved lowering the blood alcohol limit from 80 to 50milligrams of alcohol per 100millilitres of blood for drivers over 20 years old, with the legislation set to have its first reading in Parliament before Christmas.
The Government has agreed to lower the blood alcohol limit – bringing it in line with drink driving laws in Australia and America.
Tauranga Safe City coordinator Mike Mills says anything that reduces drivers' blood alcohol levels on the road has to be a good thing.
'That's the bottom line.”
He says no one should be surprised by the announcement, and while it may come as a burden to some older residents, it is another step in the right direction.
'To be honest, I think for Tauranga residents, for older folk like myself, it will be an annoyance. I am of a generation that would routinely drink and drive with relative impunity, almost like it was a right.
'By introducing a lower limit for adults, it's basically coming back to the same thing. It's getting to the point now where it's not even worth the risk. Get it into your thinking – you don't drink and drive.”
Data collected by police during the last 22 months shows 53 drivers were involved in fatal and serious injury crashes with blood alcohol readings of between 51 and 80milligrams per 100millilitres of blood across the country.
Drivers testing positive for the new lower limit will receive a $200 fine and gain 50 demerit points. Testing positive to over 80 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood while in charge of a motor vehicle will remain a criminal offence.
'This is a significant change and people are going to get caught out.
'It will cause people to rethink. There will be a few surprised and shocked people when they realise they are over the limit but feel stone cold sober.”
Mike says lowering the limit is the next step following the zero alcohol tolerance introduced for under 20-year-olds.
'If you think about what they did with the young people, they used to have a 20 limit for people under the age of 20, and it didn't work because no one really knew whether it was - one drink, two drinks or three drinks.”
Mike says given the momentum now, starting with the young people and moving to a 50 threshold for the next level, it's reinforcing the message that drinking and driving simply do not mix.
'I think it's a really important message to get through,” says Mike.
'I think it's not being done in a particularly draconian way, there may be people who think there should be the same penalties for 50 as there are at 80, but I think by introducing a graduated step it's still sending a message loud and clear.”
Mike says the law change will definitely make him think about having one beer and a glass of water, instead of a couple of beers.
'I don't want to put myself in a compromised situation. It's going to cause a lot of people to have a rethink and a lot of people will be caught out.
'I welcome it, there is a lot of evidence supporting that blood alcohol levels has a significant effect on the road tolls internationally. It's been requested and it's now being delivered.”
The law change follows a two year review of the impact of lowering the legal blood alcohol limit by 30 milligrams, which suggests 3.4 lives will be saved a year and 64 injury-causing crashes avoided. This would save $200million in social costs over 10 years, says Transportation Minister Gerry Brownlee.
What do you think of the change? Do you think it will make a difference? Let us know your thoughts – email newsroom@thesun.co.nz



8 comments
People who comply with current limit not the problem
Posted on 05-11-2013 11:22 | By Annalist
The real problem are the serial repeat drink driving offenders. These criminals are treated softly softly by a justice system that instead seems to prefer introducing tougher rules for normal people?? Repeat offenders will simply continue to offend and offend again with no regard to the law. Meantime the new limit will "catch people out" just like speed cameras positioned on a straight road at the bottom of a hill. Only harsh penalties for current offenders will lower drink driving accidents.
Lies lies and more Lies
Posted on 05-11-2013 13:09 | By Craig O
The bottom line is their 'Bottom Line'. The NZ police are a registered corporation who like any corporate only makes changes or act for financial gain.
Stats and lowering the limit
Posted on 05-11-2013 14:08 | By Anbob
I note 53 people were involved in fatal or serious accidents who were between 51 & 80ml (over 22 months?), yet the new measures would save 3.4 lives (every 12 months). Anyone can manipulate stats to suit their own crusade! I would be interested to see how many fatal accidents are CAUSED by people over the age of say 30 yrs, between 51 to 80mls AND alcohol was the contributing factor! I don't condone drink driving but target the real offenders. I think quantity and youth should be the target areas. You very rarely see mature drivers doing idiotic things unless they are well over the limit. Should leave the law the way it is and enforce current drink/drive laws more!
Alcohol change
Posted on 05-11-2013 18:50 | By GAINSEY
I could never understand why the government had to spend tax payers money to do a 2 years review on the affects of alcohol. There is more information worldwide than you could imagine and as everybody has already stated its not rocket science. The government needs to act in a more proactive manner and not procrastinating on issues that don't really need much thought just a bit of good old common sense.
good news
Posted on 05-11-2013 21:21 | By rotovend
cant see why there is a grace period everybody will know when it changes why not just make it zero and get on with it instead of people trying to work out how much they can have how much to eat and so on what rubbish and the Police are not the bad guys in this the people who abuse the rules are. imagine a NZ without any police I wouldnt b here for sure
Drink is the problem
Posted on 06-11-2013 05:55 | By NOM
NZ is probably the only country in the world that is happy to fund loads of accidents and trauma due to Alcohol, you will never be able to sift out the good and bad drinker/drivers so make the rule easier to follow and the penalties harder to swallow - then maybe just maybe our country will stop having to fund the actual cost of damage due to alcohol abuse. I think this is a positive move which has been well over due!
Craig o what are you talking about?
Posted on 06-11-2013 09:59 | By monty1212
The lowering of the limit is being introduced by the Government and not the police! They have only to implement the law which by the way is long overdue. People in this part of the country are bad enough drivers anyway without drinking.
Under 20s have already been targeted
Posted on 06-11-2013 10:11 | By southmark
and drink-driving rates for them have dropped. It makes sense that drivers 20 years and over are also targeted. It'd be good to see the recidivist drink drivers the subject of unrelenting focus though.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.