The amalgamation of Bay of Plenty's territorial authorities is a case of when, not if – is what Tauranga City Councillors have learned this week.
Following a TCC workshop to bring new councillors up to speed, Tauranga Mayor Stuart Crosby says it will take at least two years to produce something coherent – but he's hoping a start will be made later this month, when the mayors and committee chairs of all the Bay of Plenty Councils meet in Rotorua for their triennial meeting.
The current Bay of Plenty Local Authority Shared Services region
With Napier City Council and Hastings District Council being amalgamated and the Waikato region's councils on the way to coming together – the wider Bay of Plenty's territorial authorities have so far been left in the middle, and with hanging questions.
Questions are sprouting among ratepayers, as to what's going to happen to Gisborne, which is left out of Napier-Hastings? And what happens to Taupo?
'My personal view is get the mayors and chairs round the table later this month,” says Stuart. 'It would be good if we can get a Bay of Plenty-wide agreement on the way forward, with absolutely no pre-determination on any outcome.
'Our preference would be to get some independent work done on options; that would be the first step. Our view on that was it would have to be based on evidence and have a high level of credibility to it.”
Stuart thinks this is going to take two years or more.
'We want to be pro-active not reactive. What that means is we don't want to wait for somebody else to do a proposal, because anybody can do it, any individual any organisation. It doesn't have to be a council.”
Stuart says the one thing everyone has agreed on so far is the region's shareholding in the Port of Tauranga should remain as is, with Quayside Holdings and remaining independent.
'There's just far too much at stake to start meddling with that.”
Western Bay of Plenty Mayor Ross Paterson says simply amalgamating with Tauranga will not provide the change needed to kick start local government amalgamation.
'I would support a more ambitious goal, designed to economically leverage the whole of the region, and to balance the needs of a growing and ageing population, with the issue of affordable services and the protection of our communities' democratic rights,” says Ross.
'It would be very foolish indeed to put our communities through several stages of ‘scaling up' because we failed to get it right in the first instance.
Ross says he is committed to ensuring the move to amalgamation will be fit-for-purpose in the long term, while acknowledging the compelling argument of the region's communities to be represented, and to speak, with one voice.
'I am on record as saying we will be thinking far more broadly about what is in the best interests of the entire Bay of Plenty region. Rest assured our communities' interests will remain at the centre of our thinking.”
In Hawke's Bay, the Local Government Commission is consulting on one new authority called Hawkes Bay Council, population 158,000 – replacing four district councils and Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
The draft proposal is looking at one mayor and nine councillors elected from five wards, plus five Boards representing diverse communities and a Maori board. Hawke's Bay covers 14,150 square kilometres – compared to the Bay of Plenty with 12,200 square kilometres.
The proposal would result in 47 elected representatives instead of the current 57, one for every 3286 people (currently 2852 people per representative).
Meanwhile, 2014 is expected to be a key year for the Waikato, which has been working on its options since the region's last triennial meeting.
Further south, in Wellington, two applications have been accepted and notified for alternatives by the Local Government Commission, back in June.
They alternatives are: Merging the three Wairarapa District Councils; Masterton, Carterton and South Wairarapa; or for a Greater Wellington Regional Council, with a two-tier Wellington UA, covering the Wellington Region that would mean the abolition of all nine of the current councils across the region.



11 comments
The Mayor's way, same as yesterday ...
Posted on 05-12-2013 16:48 | By Murray.Guy
'My personal view is get the mayors and chairs round the table later this month,” says Stuart. 'It would be good if we can get a Bay of Plenty-wide agreement on the way forward, with absolutely no pre-determination on any outcome.... So Mr Mayor and staff, if you have chosen NOT to firstly secure initial informal feedback from the community you allegedly represent, how do you proposed to present the views of the Tauranga community to our neighbors with any authority / credibility? Having had your chats with everyone other than your community, you will by default have a pre-determined mindset (as we know you already have)by the time you get to talk to them (rather than listen). What is so hard for TCC to secure community feedback BEFORE embarking on their journey's of self fulfillment?
Back up
Posted on 06-12-2013 10:27 | By Kaimai
Is it broken? Is it going to offer more services? Is it going to reduce waste? Is it going to reduce rates? Or is it trendy? Suggest Councillors don't spend anymore money on this idea until the rate payers give some indication to the Councillors.
I Agree With Murray Guy
Posted on 06-12-2013 12:59 | By Jitter
Before even seriously considering amalgamation there has to be open and honest consultation with the ratepayers. So far as Tauranga is concerned TCC should not say "We are holding a public meeting and ratepayers are welcome". TCC should take the information and meetings to the ratepayers eg Meeting to cover Welcome Bay and Ohauiti, one to cover Otumoetai and Matua, one to cover The Mount, one to cover Papamoa etc etc. This will show ratepayers that TCC are seious in listening to their input. TCC should get off their backsides for a change and show ratepayers that they (TCC) do actually exist. It might be hard work but that is what doing a job properly is all about, not just turning up at council meetings and collecting their salary.
Mayors way vs Guys way?
Posted on 06-12-2013 15:08 | By S.Nyger
What's the difference? Seems to me that all politicians and even voted-out politicians have their predetermined mindsets. Every year the council goes through some lengthy exercise called an Annual Plan. What changes did the Mayor or for that matter Murray Guy make as a result of public submissions? In fact, based on some of the stuff I read, people were very brave to even make submissions especially if they went against a councillor's predetermined views. Could Murray Guy respond? Does the pot ever call the kettle black?
why ???
Posted on 06-12-2013 16:28 | By Hess
Well said Murray. Sounds as if they have made up our minds for us. Can not see any benefits for me living at the Mount. But being from the Mount I may be biased against any form of amalgamation.
Eyes on the money...
Posted on 06-12-2013 22:24 | By little rascal
I think the two local councils (TCC & WBOPDC) should come out with the real agenda for this drive to 'amalgamate'.. It's about getting their greedy hands on the Quay Side shares in the Port. Who has the guts to admit it I wonder.. Who would want two badly indebted councils to get their hands on this money pool? Not me that's for sure.
More rates rises
Posted on 07-12-2013 12:13 | By TheCameltoeKid
Great, so we in the Western Bay will get more rates rises to cover TCC debt. I for one totally oppose any amalgamation With TCC. It's bad enough WBOPDC hit us with 5% this year and being forced to pay for sewerage and water supply schemes even though we provide our own effectively paying twice. This is part of Crosby's grand scheme to get more ratepayers on board to help pay TCC debt and fulfill all the wishes of the demanders wanting handouts for their grandiose ideas. Oh and Murray, just what part of "voted out" don't you understand.
Rastus
Posted on 07-12-2013 15:51 | By rastus
Wake up citizens before it is too late - stop this idiotic illusion that bigger is better. We have enough trouble trying to keep Tauranga financially above water - what possible chance will any of us have if we let these people have their way (obviously not our way since we have not been consulted neither did any councillor stand at the election with this as their plank) Are we going to be sucked in once again?
carcass
Posted on 07-12-2013 16:00 | By Carcass
It appears the out come has been already made why not wait and see what happens to the other Councils and what mess comes out of it.The last amalgamation didnt work out
Not for me thanks.
Posted on 08-12-2013 20:58 | By Poseidon
At last someone's come up with a suicide plan for local and regional council. I remember the last time they tried to save money by getting bigger, ask Mount Residents how smart that move was. I'll join with the rest of you opposing this case of advanced stupidity.
amalgamation
Posted on 09-12-2013 14:24 | By phoenix
perhaps if those two spend like theres no tomorrow councils join together,they could be awarded a gold medal presentation each,for costing there ratepayers even more wasted money.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.