Tauranga's new city council is being thrown in the deep end with decisions required on the $40million urban flood protection, the Greerton Library development and tsunami warning sirens during council meetings today and tomorrow.
The flooding issue is first up with residents from Matua and Mount Maunganui addressing their concerns to councillors during the public forum at the start of today's meeting.
Flooding issues and tsunami sirens are up for discussion today.
After severe flooding in April this year, Tauranga City Council opted to spend $40m across five years to address stormwater issues – subject to confirmation through the annual plan each year and the long term plan.
Today's agenda opens the possibility the new council could reverse or modify the previous decision, advising there are other tools to manage flood risk beside infrastructure improvements.
TCC reports a balance needs to be struck between expenditure on new infrastructure, community expectation and other options available.
Council spent $80m on stormwater management across four years following the 2005 floods.
In February 2009 councillors were told another $170m needed to be spent across the city, but they instead limited the stormwater budget to $5m per year.
The areas most affected to date are within Otumoetai, Bureta, Matua, Mount industrial, Mount residential and parts of Papamoa.
Council will also attempt to settle the tsunami sirens debate, with a recommendation to discontinue the Tsunami Siren Warning project and adopt the ‘resilience' approach to community engagement and preparedness.
The advice now is for more effective and cheaper ways of warning people about the possibility of a tsunami.
Information now available to council shows the source of the maximum credible tsunami event for Tauranga City is the southern section of the Kermadec Trench. Tsunami waves of between 12.5 and 14metres in height from such an event will arrive at Papamoa about 50 minutes after the earthquake.
The Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management has since confirmed in the case of a local source tsunami, an official warning cannot be issued in time to be able to activate a siren network. Advice now is to spend the money on escape routes instead.
Thirdly, a decision is expected to be made on the Greerton Library development at 9am on Thursday.
The previous council pulled out of funding the library extension this year, stating preventing floods was more important. The library's supporters challenged the decision, as the money for the library extension comes from development contributions, and cannot be spent on anything else.
Councillors are also being asked to remove the Park Street parking issue from the public consultation process in the 2014/15 annual plan.
The previous Council resolved in September to try a one way system in Park Street. Council staff say because it only affects local residents, the fate of the informal free off-street parking area does not have to be consulted on with the wider community.
Council want the previous resolution withdrawn and Park Street dealt with as part of the annual minor safety works programme.



7 comments
deep end!!!
Posted on 11-12-2013 08:50 | By Sambo Returns
be dammed, this is why they stood for Council, get on with it and make decisions.
Basic needs must come first
Posted on 11-12-2013 10:00 | By Annalist
On this basis the "need" for expensive modifications to an existing library should come second to flood protection which is a basic essential. Once the flood protection is completed then by all means look at libraries, arts and sports if the community is prepared to pay. Not sure about the sirens but a "resilience" approach needs full explanantion.
future important
Posted on 11-12-2013 13:22 | By rotovend
basics first in a small place like Tauranga the stormwater drains etc must come first. I cant see why Greerton needs to update the Library when its not far to Tauranga or the Mount for that matter and as books all become eletronic not as much space will be needed just more technology
Bad sirens advice again
Posted on 11-12-2013 13:37 | By Papamoaner
If they can't issue a warning when they have a 50 minute start, they are incompetent. For gods sake, thousands of lives could be saved with a 50 minute warning. When a house catches fire, the siren goes to call volunteer firefighters, and they still manage to get to the station, jump in the fire engine and get to the fire in time to safe life and property. The whole emergency management setup here is incompetent from the ministry down. St John ambulance, Fire Service and search and rescue leave these clowns for dead.
Bugger the Ratepayers
Posted on 11-12-2013 14:57 | By Jitter
This looks like an easy out for TCC over the Tsunami warning sirens. I agree that a "resilience approach" needs a very detailed explanation. The fact that residents/ratepayers would feel a lot more comfortable and easier in their minds with a tsunami warning system in place ie sirens obviously does not matter. 50 minutes warning is at least something but without sirens what guarantee is there that a warning would reach everyone in time ? TCC obviously want to spend the tsunami warning system money else where and bugger the residents safety. There is likely to be a severe backlash over this.
Give
Posted on 11-12-2013 15:10 | By Capt_Kaveman
me $100,000 a year and ill solve 50% of the flooding problem in the blink of an eye
Papamoaner
Posted on 11-12-2013 15:59 | By YOGI BEAR
The performance here is going to leave all dead by the look of it, no warnings, no escape routes and all we have is "Silence of the lambs" ... read about that the "Day after tomorrow" ....
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.