$5m stormwater levy survives

A proposed rates funded levy to raise $5 million towards the city's stormwater issues survived council and will now become part of the Annual Plan consultation process.


Flooding in Mount Maunganui during the 2013 April floods.


From 1999 to 2003 the council massively underspent the drainage budget and didn't spend any at all in 2004. Floods in 2005 saw the budget increases that were pulled back in 2009 with spending again dropping well below budget except for 2012.

Tauranga City Council yesterday voted 7-4 to include the $5m levy in the Annual Plan that will go out for public submissions with Mayor Stuart Crosby and councillors Matt Cowley, Bev Edlin and Clayton Mitchell voting against it.

But councillor Steve Morris moved it, saying that in the past TCC has not finished work it promised to do after the 2005 floods.

After the floods in April 2013 there were some comments made about the $40 million in stormwater work that has still not been delivered either. He thinks it is time the rest of the community is brought up to standard.

The Mayor spoke against it saying the targeted rate is not necessary as councillors don't know how much will be required and its best to wait for the 10 Year Plan.

If council agrees to the levy on rates for stormwater, that decision will affect every other decision to be made in the Annual Plan, says Stuart. They don't know yet what they will have to take out, or the public reaction.

Matt says the levy puts the council in the position of taking ratepayers' money without knowing how much is required, and it may just have to be banked until needed.

Bev says she wants to see the facts so she knows exactly what she is basing her decision upon. She wants it dealt with through 10 Year Plan process not the Annual Plan.

Councillor John Robson says the council has consistently underspent its stormwater budget, befitting current ratepayers by $15 million.

The $5m levy, or 4.7 per cent levy, recognises that it is current ratepayers that have the advantage. He thinks the council will be able to make some spending decisions during the 2014/2015 year, and it would not have to defer anything.

The decision to impose the levy will enable the council to make an immediate start. And whenever they do decide to start they will still have to make the same decision on funding.

Tauranga City Council's history of stormwater spending is of large amounts of money spent immediately after large floods.

In the past all improvements were loan funded, to the point where the loan balance is now $85 million.

Tauranga's full exposure to flooding isn't fully understood, and is only expected to become known with the completion of the modelling programme now underway.

City suburbs flooded to date include Otumoetai, Bureta, Matua, Mount industrial, Mount residential, Judea industrial, Maleme Street industrial, and parts of Papamoa and the Avenues.

In February 2009 councillors were advised that about $170 million was required to complete stormwater improvements across the city, and that was a low estimate at the time.

Following the landslides and flooding in 2005, the council increased the stormwater budget to $20 million each year. Because of planning design and consenting, it took nearly two years to reach the $20m level.

In 2009 the $20m was reduced to $5.528 million per annum where it has remained ever since - a decision that resulted in a number of flood control projects being delayed beyond the 10 Year Plan period.

After the 2013 floods councillors said they would increase future funding for stormwater by spending $40 million over five years, subject to confirmation through the Annual Plan and the long term plan.

The decision to use rate funding is contrary to current council policy, which is that capital spending is paid for with borrowed money to recognise the intergenerational nature that arises.

The council is going to have to pass a special resolution because of the levy.

7 comments

Why are we waiting!!!

Posted on 04-02-2014 09:56 | By Sambo Returns

If 20 million a year had been budgeted, where have all the dollars gone, next time we have a once in a hundred year storm,(I have lived here 40 years and we have had at least 4)Mr Crosby can maybe come along to my place and suck the water out personally, surely a decent storm water system is paramount!!!!and those who voted against its implementation should be chastised by all ratepayers.


Hopeless

Posted on 04-02-2014 11:18 | By Andrew B

I guess the councillors who voted against this don't live in a flood prone area, and therefore don't care. I have noted their names so they sure won't get my vote next election.


Didn't I read

Posted on 04-02-2014 16:21 | By WSTAKL

something last week where an 'expert' was trying to say Tauranga was indeed an affordable city to live in, despite the fact it is the second least affordable behind Auckland. And this here folks is one of the reason why.


who is to blame?

Posted on 04-02-2014 19:56 | By Dippie

It is easy to blame flooding on Council or the Councillors, but have you thought about firstly you bought there ,secondly someone greedy built there. Why must others pay for stupid mistakes that was made in the past? The councillors against it is 100% correct, no one knows the solution at this stage. At least give TCC a chance to investigate properly. Threats will not solve the problem.


Dippie, Council is responsible

Posted on 04-02-2014 23:42 | By Murray.Guy

Clearly not responsible for the rain but most certainly are for much of the significant flooding. Council has controlled the availability and location of residential and industrial developments. In an effort to maximise their rate base and minimise the impact on 'greenfields'(rural spread) the Council has encouraged infill housing. Unfortunately it has not increased the storm water infrastructure to match the infill - thus, the rain comes down and the floods come up! Sorry Dippie, but Council got it's priorities wrong, and today the Mayor is still trying to build stadiums and fund favoured events BEFORE meaningfully addressing the critical and basic storm water and flood mitigation.


Poor planning..

Posted on 05-02-2014 02:01 | By awaroa

and decision-making in the past is where the blame lies Dippie, I mean, who do you think gave the building consent to build there?? Now look who the greedy are. A council who would rather allow a home to be built in a area susceptible to flood danger in order to get the ticket clipped, building consent fee, impact fee and more. So, why should others pay? Because we are unfortunately victims of the past. There are solutions out there. Getting the council to take notice of the options is the hard part. If they can't claim the fame, not interested.


@Dippie

Posted on 05-02-2014 05:38 | By Sambo Returns

are you for real!!!!, there are many council employees giving out consents, and planning the development of this city, they call this area the Bay Of Plenty for a reason, and all the future employees with degrees in town planning, still could not get it, this area was going to develop quickly, decent infrastructure has to be the backbone for development, that is why we have a Council, getting one with some foresight is the problem, the solution is very simple.......... just fix it!!!!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.