A resource consent application to leave the remains of the Rena wreck on Astrolabe Reef on the basis it will avoid further environmental harm through salvage operations will be made as soon as next week.
Tauranga City Council's City Delivery Committee was yesterday told the ship's owners and insurers intend to lodge the application with the Bay of Plenty Regional Council ahead of the March deadline.
Rena debris continues to be removed from the wreck.
The containership Rena struck the Astrolabe Reef, about 25km off the coast of Tauranga, on October 5, 2011. The ship leaked more than 350 tonnes of heavy fuel oil into the environment and broke up, spilling containers and cargo into the ocean, washing up on beaches across the Bay of Plenty.
BECA technical director of planning Keith Frentz told TCC that lengthy investigations and marine sampling on the reef surrounding the wreck showed more damage than what would be caused by leaving the wreck, minus the accommodation block, there.
He says full removal of the wreck will put environmental recovery of the surrounding area back between five to 10 years if salvors continue cutting the wreck into pieces – potentially disturbing harmful contaminants.
So far 700 tonnes has been removed from the debris field, with further plans being developed to extract the remaining plastic beads from Hold 4 and focussing on aluminium ingots and hazardous inorganic materials.
'There is a lot of stuff down there and not all of it is hazardous or dangerous, so we are focussing on what is hazardous and needs to be removed,” says Keith.
'It cannot return to a pre-Rena state. Assessments show removal effects could be more significant than leaving it there.”
Two contaminants under close scrutiny are a copper clove container assumed to be in Hold 6 – 45 metres below the surface – and TBT paint used in anti-fouling.
Further salvage operations removing sections of the wreck, following last week's 300 tonne section of the accommodation block, could disrupt the contaminants dispersing them throughout the marine life.
Keith says compared to the 50 hectare reef the wreck is only one hectare, or two per cent, of the entire area and admits it is never going to be restored to its pre-state despite salvors' efforts.
The owner's direction is not to endorse the wreck becoming a dive site but rather this would be a potential by-product of leaving the wreck there.
Once the resource consent is lodged an extended public submissions' process of 40 days, compared the typical 20, will take place between May and June. It will then go before the Environment Court.
Motiti Island hapu is continuing to fight to have their claim for full removal resolved this month. Ngai Te Hapu Incorporated Society lodged the Treaty claim under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 last May.

A dive survey of the wreck and surrounding reef is undertaken.

An example of debris still to be removed from the wreck.



4 comments
Move It!!
Posted on 19-03-2014 13:22 | By Mary Faith
Quoting from the above text "full removal of the wreck will put environmental recovery of the surrounding area back between five to 10 years if salvors continue cutting the wreck into pieces - potentially disturbing harmful contaminants". So they want to leave the'harmful contaminants' there. Do they not think that time and tides will eventually release them?? It will probably be a case of BIG money talks - and we locals will be forced live with the toxic aftermath. Use it as a dive reef? How can anyone allow that when it may disturb the 'harmful contaminants'? I hope our all our local councils stand firm together in ordering total removal of the wreck. It is a ticking time bomb now and will be so until such time as it is removed. The insurers have the money - and there are machines in use that can lift it.
rena risk
Posted on 19-03-2014 16:06 | By sangrae
if it is too risky to remove , it hs got to be to risky for recreational diving, does it not?
emotional or practical
Posted on 19-03-2014 17:57 | By rotovend
I thought due to slow dissipation of wrecks being less harmful overall was what they meant. As a major NZ port there are all sorts of things in the water from cruise ships and container ships etc. It seems the experts are split but I dont think emotional arguments without facts hold any value. Wouldnt also be nice if Iwi would offer to contribute to removal instead of always using lawyers and wasting money arguing, just a thought that would get the job done quicker if thats what they want
Harmful contaminants
Posted on 19-03-2014 21:43 | By Raewyn
At last it has come out into the open. Some people did not believe this before! If the wreck is left there it continue to contaminate the reef and our beaches for at least another 50 years like in England they still have problems on their beaches from the 2nd world war so it would not be safe for any site-seeing Divers!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.