Bottle store owner under fire

A bottle store owner looking to extend his chain of stores to the heart of the Mount CBD is coming under increasing pressure for his lack of due diligence into the proposed site and surrounding demographic.

Go Liquor Limited managing director Inderpreet Singh is applying for a liquor licence at the former Vogue Lighting store in ‘Vogue House' at 9 Prince Avenue.


Go Liquor Limited managing director Inderpreet Singh. Photos: Bruce Barnard.


Mount Mainstreet Peter Melgren is opposed to the alcohol store, as is Mount business owner Mark Rundell.

It is Inderpreet's intention to open a 'high end” bottle store specialising in premium wines and whiskeys along with general alcohol.

Before the District Licensing Committee today, Inderpreet says he is aware the area is a permanent liquor free zone but says there are already two other bottle stores in the allocated area.

The other liquor stores are Downtown Foodmarket and Mount Liquor Mart, both on Maunganui Road.

'We do not consider that a third liquor store in the liquor-free zone will add to the alcohol harm,” says Inderpreet.

'My reason to apply for a liquor licence in this store is that it's in a town centre in a commercial area not in a residential area.”

But he faces a barrage of opposition, 18 submissions in total, including submissions from Police, Tauranga District Licensing Committee and Mount businesses undermining his lack of CBD knowledge.

In front of the committee and opposition, Inderpreet estimated the store would earn $20,000 a week to start off, before this increases to $35,000 once a cliental base is developed.

Western Bay of Plenty Police alcohol harm reduction co-ordinator Sergeant Nigel McGlone put it to Inderpreet that a third liquor store would do nothing but increase the level of alcohol-related harm.

He says if the bottle store is not opened, there is no other option than for the public to go elsewhere in way of purchasing alcohol.

Inderpreet – who currently operates three other licensed premises; Hot Spot Liquor on Oceanbeach Road, Papamoa Liquor Centre on Gravatt Road, and Thirsty Liquor Unit on Domain Road – disagrees.

'I don't believe so. If you are doing the right thing by following the law what difference if they are buying it from here or down the block?

'We have proven before by winning the hearing in 2012 for our other store that by adding a third store in the same area will not contribute to liquor abuse.”

The basis of Inderpreet's application is on what he says is research from the existing bottle store on Oceanbeach Road.

He claims the demographic and median age is the same in the two areas.

Liquor licensing inspector Danielle Jurgeleit says this is false with 12 per cent of the Mount Maunganui North demographic under 15-years, a worrying percentage given the application to open the store less than 300 metres away from residential properties.

She adds the vacant space next to the intended bottle store is being earmarked as a cake store where families can purchase cake and coffee, a space that will not be benefitted by a bottle store.

Inderpreet's interpretation of a 'high end” bottle store also comes under fire with licensing committee member David Stewart questioning whether the 25-40 age bracket Inderpreet is targeting will make the trip into the CBD.

The licencing committee is chairman Murray Clearwater and committee members Mary Dillon and David Stewart.

8 comments

Rethink

Posted on 26-09-2014 20:04 | By Number eight

We as a society need to rethink liquor laws in this country.Alcohol in the wrong hands is the most destructive drug and yes people it is a drug,known to man kind.While certain recreational drugs eg cannabis are outlawed,in my opinion I would rather be in a room of pot smoking people,than a room full of drunks hands down.Alcohol in all it's glory continues on it's destructive path.To allow another liquor out let to be establish is just plain crazy,the harm that this drug causes to society and the cost as well is just not worth it......NO MORE LIQUOR OUTLETS


enoughisenough

Posted on 26-09-2014 20:24 | By Jaybee

United you stand as we did in Katikati. We did not need another liquor store, we objected to his application and we won. How many liquor stores do we have to have in our CBD before we have enough?


Be Fair

Posted on 26-09-2014 20:45 | By Surfwatch

People will drink the same whether there are more or less liquor stores around. More liquor outlets will not mean more drinking. After all there are lots of supermarkets selling beer and wine. I say higher penalties for selling to underage purchasers. Increase the drinking age to 19.


Liquor

Posted on 27-09-2014 09:55 | By rosscoo

It is available in supermarkets as well so why do we need more outlets? Yes the more outlets the more competitive making shop owners have more specials and bring down prices.


greed is what it is

Posted on 27-09-2014 10:04 | By Me again

this man looks like he wants to feed off the community. I mean surely 2 or 3 liquor stores is enough for one. Put up a indian restaurant or takeaway for good food.


Then ban alcohol and pubs completely??

Posted on 27-09-2014 11:51 | By BullShtAlert

If people have a drinking problem that is their responsibility and other normal people shouldn't be penalised. What next, a restriction on the number of churches (religion can have bad effects), fashion shops (some people go into debt buying clothes), icecream shops (too many fat unhealthy people) and the list goes on. Either ban alcohol and pubs outright or stop this wowserism and pseudo moral outrage.


Too many outlets now

Posted on 27-09-2014 12:48 | By Bestlife

Please unite against this proposal. We have too many liquor outlets now, and another one so close to a residential area (in a liquor free zone no less) is crazy. Follow Katikati's example and object to this application.


@BullShtAlert

Posted on 27-09-2014 14:35 | By tibs

I agree with you. But it seems the odds are stacked against him anyway. As for others saying it's available in supermarkets, it's approximately 3km to the nearest one. All supermarkets in the Mount are as close to residential accommodation as this would be. whilst it is in a liquor ban area, that's related to the consumption. I note that alfresco diners on the pavements are able to consume openly, though. Nice to see where the money goes, too. Two committee members, both ex councillors and the chairman, about $1400 per day for that lot. And, to suggest that because (I presume) he's Indian that he should put up an Indian Restaurant or a takeaway shop. That's a bit patronising isn't it?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.