Tauranga mayor, councillors rate their performance

Mayor Mahé Drysdale rated himself a seven out of 10 for leadership. Photo / David Hall

Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale scores his leadership lower than most of his team members score him.

Councils around the country are regrouping after the October 11 election, but the Tauranga councillors are a year into their special four-year term and were spared the polls.

Tauranga’s elected “team of 10” replaced the Government-appointed commission that ran the city from 2021.

Local Democracy Reporting asked the mayor and councillors to rate their performance out of 10 in seven key areas after 14 months on the job.

Drysdale rated himself a seven for leadership, as did his deputy Jen Scoular, but four colleagues gave him an eight.

His leadership was rated a 10 by Steve Morris, the only councillor re-elected from the 2019 cohort sacked by the Government after issues such as in-fighting.

Drysdale, a five-time world single-sculls rowing champion, said he was a “pretty harsh critic of myself”.

“I’m proud of my leadership [but] there’s things that I could do better.”

It was a “very different” environment to sport, and he said he could have done better in communicating the reasons for some of his decisions with his councillors.

Councillor Glen Crowther gave Drysdale the lowest leadership score of six.

He said Drysdale supported councillors to air their views, but his rating was because of the Local Water Done Well decision that Drysdale made using his casting vote, and a “lack of councillor input into the regional deal negotiations”.

Tauranga councillors Hautapu Baker, Kevin Schuler, Rick Curach, Hemi Rolleston, mayor Mahé Drysdale, deputy mayor Jen Scoular, Marten Rozeboom, Steve Morris, Glen Crowther and Rod Taylor. Photo / Alisha Evans
Tauranga councillors Hautapu Baker, Kevin Schuler, Rick Curach, Hemi Rolleston, mayor Mahé Drysdale, deputy mayor Jen Scoular, Marten Rozeboom, Steve Morris, Glen Crowther and Rod Taylor. Photo / Alisha Evans

Drysdale rated himself a nine for enabling a cohesive governance team.

He said he was proud of how they worked together, but delivering was the challenge.

The hardest part of the past year was how long it took to start delivering projects, he said.

Four councillors rated Drysdale a seven, three an eight, and Morris gave him another 10 for enabling a cohesive governance team.

Councillor Hautapu Baker gave a seven and said the occasional disconnection between staff and councillors meant more work was needed.

He suggested a paintball or dodgeball tournament between the councillors and executive leadership team.

Councillor Rod Taylor said “the team of 10″ had been tested a few times, but genuinely wanted to work well together.

For fiscal management and rates affordability, Drysdale rated himself a six.

An impression of the $306m civic precinct development Te Manawataki o Te Papa, started by the commission, aimed at reviving the city's heart. Image / Tauranga City Council
An impression of the $306m civic precinct development Te Manawataki o Te Papa, started by the commission, aimed at reviving the city's heart. Image / Tauranga City Council

His lowest rating was a four from Crowther, who said this was a collective responsibility, not just the mayor’s.

The members were asked to rate how the group was doing in four areas.

For creating a vibrant city, Drysdale rated the council an eight. Most gave it a six or seven.

Morris rated it a six and said the city was “more than spending [money] on a couple of hectares downtown”.

Drysdale gave the council an eight for community engagement and improving public opinion of the council. Councillors’ ratings ranged from five to eight.

Baker gave a six; he said efforts were improving, but gaining trust took time. What he heard from the community and what “transpired online” was “challenging”, because they were “extreme ends of the same spectrum”.

Relationships with other councils had the most range. Two councillors rated it a four, Drysdale rated it a seven, and the highest rating was eight.

Crowther said the council had “annoyed” other Bay of Plenty councils over the years, and recent calls for amalgamation discussions made this worse.

Drysdale gave a five to the council’s impact on infrastructure to support housing, but said it should get a nine for trying.

Ōtūmoetai councillor Glen Crowther. Photo / David Hall
Ōtūmoetai councillor Glen Crowther. Photo / David Hall

The council wanted to deliver on this but it took time, so this was something it could improve, he said.

Most gave a six or seven, and the lowest was a five.

Marten Rozeboom was the only councillor not to respond to the survey.

Local Democracy Reporting asked the New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union to comment on the ratings.

 

What do you think of the council's performance?

Send a letter to the editor

Send email

Head of communications Tory Relf said it was “reassuring” that Drysdale’s rating of himself was not too dissimilar to his colleagues’ views of him.

Leadership and teamwork had improved after the “issues” Tauranga faced, she said.

In her view, the more concerning figures were for fiscal management and rates affordability.

Given Tauranga’s fast-rising rates, “a six or seven out of 10 doesn’t inspire much confidence”.

For the whole-of-council ratings, she said “mid-range scores on housing, infrastructure and community engagement might sound reasonable”, but she believed a six was not good enough for “ratepayers footing ever-rising bills”.

 

 

“Tauranga needs to show real progress on keeping rates affordable and cutting waste in order to deliver the infrastructure the city desperately needs.”

Another stand-out was the low score for relationships with other councils, she said.

“Co-operation with neighbouring councils is crucial to keeping costs down and tackling regional challenges like housing and transport, so that number needs to lift.”

The council’s 2025 annual residents’ survey showed overall satisfaction with the council was 44%, up from 34% in 2024.

The council’s scores

Mahé Drysdale

Mayoral leadership: 7

Cohesive governance: 9

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 7

Vibrant city: 8

Community engagement: 8

Inter-council relationships: 7

Infrastructure to support housing: 5

Jen Scoular

Mayoral leadership: 7

Cohesive governance: 7

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 6

Vibrant city: 6

Community engagement: 6

Inter-council relationships: 6

Infrastructure to support housing: 6

Kevin Schuler

Mayoral leadership: 8

Cohesive governance: 8

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 7

Vibrant city: 7

Community engagement: 8

Inter-council relationships: 6

Infrastructure to support housing: 7

Hautapu Baker

Mayoral leadership: 8

Cohesive governance: 7

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 6

Vibrant city: 7

Community engagement: 6

Inter-council relationships: 8

Infrastructure to support housing: 7

Rod Taylor

Mayoral leadership: 8

Cohesive governance: 7

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 7

Vibrant city: 6

Community engagement: 7

Inter-council relationships: 4

Infrastructure to support housing: 7

Glen Crowther

Mayoral leadership: 6

Cohesive governance: 8

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 4

Vibrant city: 6

Community engagement: 5

Inter-council relationships: 4

Infrastructure to support housing: 7

Rick Curach

Mayoral leadership: 8

Cohesive governance: 7

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 6

Vibrant city: 7

Community engagement: 8

Inter-council relationships: 6

Infrastructure to support housing: 7

Hēmi Rolleston

Mayoral leadership: 8

Cohesive governance: 8

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 8

Vibrant city: 7

Community engagement: 7

Inter-council relationships: 6

Infrastructure to support housing: 7

Steve Morris

Mayoral leadership: 10

Cohesive governance: 10

Fiscal management and rates affordability: 5

Vibrant city: 6

Community engagement: 5

Inter-council relationships: 7

Infrastructure to support housing: 5

 

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

14 comments

Public poll.

Posted on 28-10-2025 09:34 | By beejay8

Could we have a public poll, please? Or, is the press frightened of upsetting the council?


Hmmm

Posted on 28-10-2025 11:09 | By Let's get real

Rose tinted glasses.
This is totally irrelevant. The only perspective that matters is that of the electorate.
Let's see who gets to stay and who gets the chop.
It's a massive problem, as far as I'm concerned, that the management team are totally unaccountable for the direction that they are forcing through. I'm fortunate maybe, that I have decided to vote with my feet, and I'm seeking new pastures to another part of the country and gaining a 50% reduction in rates into the bargain.
I've had enough of this local BS, I wouldn't trust the management team and many of the councillors to run a bath.
Nice to have ivory towers and civic monstrosities ahead of infrastructure and PLANNING properly for city expansion. It's becoming like Disneyland... just as congested and hugely disappointing.


@ lets get real

Posted on 28-10-2025 13:06 | By Kancho

I have to agree it is largely an irrelevant poll. I also agree that the management team are steering the direction with all the nonsense of overspend on Cameron road for no gain and the CBD precinct et al while core business remains behind. Old Pipework insufficient congestion and roading a mess , water still an issue. So much to catch up on and yet constant rate rises forever to service debt on nice to haves or not even necessary . Still can't see any drive for restructuring either


Let's get real

Posted on 28-10-2025 13:21 | By Kancho

I can understand your leaving and wish you all the best in your new place. I will miss your posts as will many I expect. I am too invested here otherwise I would have done the same some time ago as Tauranga has changed so much from the easier living once appreciated and enjoyed.


The Master

Posted on 28-10-2025 13:33 | By Ian Stevenson

What fatuous nonsense!!

This mob are expert at self-back slapping... It would seem that the numbers used are to big, beyond comprehension? almost all are 5-9. They have obviously forgotten that 0-4 exist and in fact there are a huge raft of appropriate options <0...

This list obviously is wishy-washy, warm fuzzies and so on, no real stuff like: -
1 Decisions in the best interests of voters?
2 Transparent?
3 Accountable to ratepayers
4 Responsible spending?
5 Managing debt?
6 Is spending under control?
7 Is TCC CEO-staff competence appropriate for the job?
8 Have EM's avoided obvious losses?
9 Have EM's caused losses to ratepayers?
10 Are rates affordable for every ratepayer?

The answer to these better 10 questions would (if truthful and honest) all be <<< zero and some.


I'd rate him an ah um

Posted on 28-10-2025 15:13 | By Mein Fuhrer

Big fat ZERO.


10/10

Posted on 28-10-2025 16:22 | By R99

Public Poll and Hmmm deserve a 10/10 for their comments. Meanwhile Mayor and Councillors are over-rating themselves just like they with their ratepayers! Tax Payers Union are indeed generous in their opinion, more so than what I imagine your poor rate payer would be.


Rating

Posted on 28-10-2025 17:39 | By Fernhill22

If you want to give yourselves a rating across all categories- one word sums it up- Sh@t

I'd have to agree with the comments made on here by The Master on the real issues that people want answers on.


@Let's get real

Posted on 28-10-2025 20:30 | By morepork

Really sorry you are leaving and will miss your posts.
Still. I don't blame you.
I agree that this "self-evaluation" poll is pretty pointless.
They say that popular approval of the Council has gone up to 40%; I wonder if those are Ratepayers, or just residents.
Ratepayers have seen no sign of respect for OUR money, no proper transparency or accountability of projects and why they were considered worth doing, no REAL effort to cut waste in any seriously meaningful way, and no real empathy or understanding of the community by the Council with things like road noise in community living areas. They work in an overpriced building which was their first priority and which they don't even own.
There are still deals being sought to allow race-based appointments and support co-governance, despite the Government's assurances that this won't happen.
Council still lacks engagement and transparency


Yeah Nah

Posted on 29-10-2025 06:59 | By Thats Nice

What a load of bunk. A "vibrant city" you've got to be kidding. So much of our money being spent on absolute rubbish. It's a no thanks from me.


You joking

Posted on 29-10-2025 08:34 | By an_alias

So we have come to the point we can just rate ourselves ?
What the heck are you doing wasting money on this and time.
I mean this is as good as the commissioners asking the mirror how they are doing along with there mates.
You failed out of the gate with a budget blowout and zero reductions.


Poll

Posted on 29-10-2025 12:46 | By peanuts9

Mahe Drysdale won the election but the same old, same old moaners don't like it.
He is, by a long way, not the worst mayor this city has had.
I suggest people think back to previous mayors, the lack of maintenance of the infrastructure, the attitude that only some areas were worth spending money on & the promotion of "the old boys" network to the detriment of much of the city.


So what so when

Posted on 30-10-2025 09:11 | By Kancho

It's not about them it's about priorities and performance. So given that there has been under investment in core essential services then when will the spending on nice to haves stop. The commissioners have spent up large so how can council reset, wind back, restructure. Underselling assets, signing up eye watering lease of their ivory tower and the museum cycle lanes et al before infrastructure pipes etc. roading. So play rating their own performance is not the focus for ratepayers but the results of getting back to core business as the government has pointed out to them


@peanuts9

Posted on 30-10-2025 12:55 | By morepork

Yes, Mr. Drysdale DID win the election but he has failed to meet the expectations which most of us had for him.
I agree he is NOT the worst Mayor the city has had, (that dishonour goes to the Commission and Queen Anne), but is "not the worst" a positive commendation you would want to see on the Mayor's CV?
We have a right to expect an elected council will engage with us properly over major construction decisions, show proper respect and thriftiness when dispensing OUR money, and do everything possible to prevent rate increases. We could also expect REAL attempts to curb blatant waste within the administration. The role of the Mayor is to lead and facilitate these actions. A sporting celebrity comes with an edge already.
Mahe Drysdale is NOT the worst, but that doesn't mean he can't do better.
I hope he does.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.